Paper · 1949 · Bragantia

[NO TITLE AVAILABLE]

A. S. Costa; T. J. Grant; S. Moreira

20
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The writers review previous concepts concerning the reaction of citrus plants to the tristeza disease. It is recognized that environmental factors such as temperature, humidity and light can influence plant reaction, but these are considered of relatively minor importance. Characteristics of the plant itself govern its reaction to the disease and among those, resistance to infection, ability to permit virus increase and tolerance or non-tolerance of tissues are considered most important. Tests using viruliferous oriental citrus aphids for inoculation of various citrus types budded over sour orange rootstocks (table 1 and 2) showed a correlation between susceptibility to infection and severity of symptoms. The sweet oranges proved to be the most susceptible to infection and showed severe disease symptoms. The Barão sweet orange appeared to be more susceptible than Valencia. The mandarins tended to show some resistance to infection, but when infected, severe symptoms developed. The tolerant tangelos (7) behaved similarly to sweet oranges : They were very susceptible to infection and showed severe symptoms. The non-tolerant tangelos, susceptible citranges (7) and grapefruits behaved more or less alike, and showed medium susceptibility to infection and moderately severe disease symptoms. Among the grapefruits, Leonardy was. observed to be relatively more susceptible and showed more severe symptoms than Duncan. The pummelos, shaddocks and sour oranges were comparatively very resistant to infection and showed only moderate symptoms when infected. It has been found that the sour oranges can be more easily infected by tissue union than by the aphid vector. Poncirus trifoliata, citrumelos and resistant citranges showed no symptoms and no virus could be recovered from the inoculated plants even after three inoculations. The nature of injury caused by tristeza in the non-tolerant graft and intergraft combinations is discussed. The observation of symptoms shown by plants consisting of a sour orange inter-stem-graft between sweet orange roots and foliage seems to indicate that phloem collapse of the sour intergraft does not entirely prevent food translocation, since under field conditions the sweet stem below the sour intergraft continued, for almost two years, to increase in size at about the same rate as the sweet stem above. The growth of the sour intergraft was observed to be constricted and its lack of developments indicates a possible injurious effect of the disease on tissues other than the phloem. Root tissues of sour oranges have been found to be sensitive ;to injury, sincejsweet orange tops grafted directly onto sour orange roots and subsequently inoculated showed the usual tristeza symptoms. Death of rootlets and roots was found to occur not only in infected plants with tolerant tops and non-tolerant rootstocks but also on infected tolerant plants having an inter-stem-graft of non-tolerant sour orange. These observations and those made of root reaction on mechanically ringed plants indicate that although the root tissues of non-tolerant stocks may be sensitive to injury the rootlet and root symptoms are mostly secondary reactions. Tests carried out showed that the tristeza virus was recovered from insect protected sprouts grown at the ends of severed roots of Caipira sweet orange stock thus indicating that the virus was definitely present in the roots of a tolerant rootstock. Previously tristeza has been recognized as being associated with various citrus stock-scion combinations. In the present paper 50 seedling types have been reported as showing tristeza symptoms following heavy aphid inoculation. The symptoms shown by infected seedlings are similar to those shown by non-tolerant stock-scion combinations. Small sweet orange seedlings have been observed to show some symptoms of tristeza following heavy inoculations, but citrus types possessing tolerant tissues have shown a tendency toward recovery from symptom expression. The writers, on the basis of observed plant responses, have discussed the mode of inheritance of the main characteristis involved in plant reaction to tristeza. Some seedling progenies of known crosses between Poncirus trifoliata and sweet oranges (citranges) have been found to permit virus increase as the sweet orange parent does, whereas others behave like P. trifoliata and apparently do not permit virus multiplication. No relationship has been found between the trifoliata leaf-shape and inability to permit virus increase, since some of the hybrids that possess the trifoliata leaves, permit virus multiplication. Backcrosses of citranges to sweet oranges show a tendency to behave like the sweet orange parent. Hybrids between P. trifoliata and grapefruits (citrumelos) have behaved in most cases as the parent P. trifoliata. This seems to indicate that tolerant tissues and inability to permit virus increase are dependent on dominant factors in this type of cross. Hybrids between Citrus reticulata and C. paradisi (tangelos) do not show a clear-cut type of inheritance. Some tangelos behave Uke the mandarin parent, possessing tolerant tissues ; others behave like the grapefruit parent indicating possession of non-tolerant tissues. The inability to permit virus increase is a characteristic of little value in a rootstock improvement since tops of most commercial citrus varieties permit virus multiplication. It is pointed out that improvement of citrus rootstock with respect to tristeza should be aimed at combining tolerant tissues such as found in P. trifoliata or hybrids, C. sinensis, C. reticulata, etc., with other favorable characters such as vigor, resistance to gummosis, etc. Field tests showed that the reaction of infective buds on different rootstocks varies not only according to the tolerance of non-tolerance of the rootstock tissues, but also according to whether the buds themselves belong to types that possess non-tolerant or tolerant tissues. Infective buds of tolerant types, as sweet oranges, when budded on non-tolerant stocks produce a first flush of growth that is apparently healthy, but which later shows disease symptoms. For a period of about two months from date of budding, there is little or no difference between sprouts from healthy or infective buds of tolerant types. In contrast, when infective buds of non-tolerant types are budded on non-tolerant stocks, disease symptoms appear practically as soon as the buds start to grow. Observations indicate that infective buds from tolerant citrus types when budded on tolerant stocks usually do not develop symptoms even though the plant is a carrier of the virus. On the other hand observations indicate that infective buds of non-tolerant citrus types when budded on tolerant stocks may at times produce some symptoms. A possible explanation for the above-mentioned reactions is presented and is based on the relation between virus movement and food translocation in the plant. In the study of the relationship of tristeza virus to host tissues, plants composed of a sweet top over sour orange rootstock were allowed to develop two sweet orange branches. One branch of each plant was then ringed and inoculated by the vector. The branch not inoculated did not develop symptoms and 16 months after inoculation, buds were taken from the inoculated and the non-inoculated branches and tested for presence of virus. All buds taken from the inoculated ringed branches were found to be carrying the virus, whereas the buds taken from the other branch of the same plant did not have any virus. This experiment shows that the tristeza virus was not able to move across the ringed portion of the stem during that period, thus indicating that the tristeza virus is probably a phloem virus. Results from extensive buddings of various citrus stocks in the field indicate that buds taken from old sweet orange plants that have been known to be infected for a long time have been found to carry the virus in all buds. On the other hand, tests with buds taken from young plants recently infected, of Duncan grapefruit, sour orange and in some cases of Dancy tangerine and Valencia sweet orange, showed that not all buds were carrying the virus. It is not yet known whether buds that are mature prior to infection may temporarily escape virus invasion or whether citrus types which have non-tolerant tissues may limit to a certain extent complete systemic invasion of the tristeza virus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tristeza infection susceptibility correlated with symptom severity across citrus types.

Outcome
severity of symptomse0
Comparator
susceptibility to infectione0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“showed a correlation between susceptibility to infection and severity of symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–713 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet oranges were most susceptible and had severe symptoms.

Taxon
sweet orangesCitrus sinensise0
Outcome
susceptible to infection and showed severe disease symptomse0
Direction
moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sweet oranges proved to be the most susceptible to infection and showed severe disease symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–814 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barão sweet orange was more susceptible than Valencia.

Taxon
Barão sweet orangee0
Material
Barãoe0
Outcome
susceptiblee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Valenciae0

Verbatim

e0

“The Barão sweet orange appeared to be more susceptible than Valencia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–884 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mandarins resisted infection somewhat but had severe symptoms when infected.

Taxon
mandarinse0
Outcome
severe symptomse0
Qualifier
when infectede0

Verbatim

e0

“The mandarins tended to show some resistance to infection, but when infected, severe symptoms developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–989 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant tangelos were highly susceptible and developed severe symptoms.

Taxon
tolerant tangelose0
Outcome
severe symptomse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The tolerant tangelos (7) behaved similarly to sweet oranges : They were very susceptible to infection and showed severe symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-tolerant tangelos, susceptible citranges and grapefruits had medium susceptibility and moderately severe symptoms.

Taxon
grapefruitsCitrus ×paradisie0
Outcome
medium susceptibility to infection and moderately severe disease symptomse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The non-tolerant tangelos, susceptible citranges (7) and grapefruits behaved more or less alike, and showed medium susceptibility to infection and moderately severe disease symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1303 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leonardy grapefruit was more susceptible and symptomatic than Duncan.

Material
Leonardye0
Outcome
symptomse0
Direction
more severee0
Comparator
Duncane0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Leonardy was. observed to be relatively more susceptible and showed more severe symptoms than Duncan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1428 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pummelos, shaddocks and sour oranges were relatively resistant and showed only moderate symptoms when infected.

Taxon
sour orangesCitrus ×aurantiume0
Outcome
moderate symptomse0
Qualifier
when infectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x aurantium
Citrus ×aurantium · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pummelos, shaddocks and sour oranges were comparatively very resistant to infection and showed only moderate symptoms when infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sour oranges were infected more easily by tissue union than aphid vector.

Taxon
sour orangesCitrus ×aurantiume0
Treatment
tissue unione0
Outcome
infectede0
Direction
more easilye0
Comparator
aphid vectore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x aurantium
Citrus ×aurantium · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sour oranges can be more easily infected by tissue union than by the aphid vector”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1675 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poncirus trifoliata, citrumelos and resistant citranges remained symptom-free and virus-free after three inoculations.

Taxon
Poncirus trifoliataCitrus trifoliatae0
Outcome
no symptoms and no virus could be recoverede0
Value
three inoculationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus trifoliata
Citrus trifoliata · TaxonJebulon · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poncirus trifoliata, citrumelos and resistant citranges showed no symptoms and no virus could be recovered from the inoculated plants even after three inoculations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1840 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A sour orange intergraft showed constricted growth despite continuing sweet stem growth.

Taxon
soure0
Organ / stage
intergrafte0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
constrictede0

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of the sour intergraft was observed to be constricted and its lack of developments indicates a possible injurious effect of the disease on tissues other than the phloem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2357–2536 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root death in infected grafts was interpreted mainly as a secondary reaction.

Organ / stage
rootlet and roote0
Outcome
symptomse0
Qualifier
mostly secondary reactionse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the rootlet and root symptoms are mostly secondary reactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3125–3185 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tristeza virus was recovered from protected sprouts of severed Caipira sweet orange roots.

Taxon
Caipira sweet orangee0
Organ / stage
severed rootse0
Outcome
tristeza virus was recoverede0

Verbatim

e0

“the tristeza virus was recovered from insect protected sprouts grown at the ends of severed roots of Caipira sweet orange stock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3217–3344 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty citrus seedling types developed tristeza symptoms after heavy aphid inoculation.

Organ / stage
seedlinge0
Outcome
tristeza symptomse0
Value
50 seedling typese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“50 seedling types have been reported as showing tristeza symptoms following heavy aphid inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3564–3663 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some citrange progeny permitted virus increase whereas others did not.

Taxon
Poncirus trifoliataCitrus trifoliatae0
Material
citrangese0
Outcome
virus increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus trifoliata
Citrus trifoliata · TaxonJebulon · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some seedling progenies of known crosses between Poncirus trifoliata and sweet oranges (citranges) have been found to permit virus increase as the sweet orange parent does, whereas others behave like P. trifoliata and apparently do not permit virus multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4156–4419 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifoliate leaf shape was unrelated to inability to permit virus increase.

Organ / stage
trifoliata leaf-shapee0
Outcome
inability to permit virus increasee0
Direction
No relationshipe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“No relationship has been found between the trifoliata leaf-shape and inability to permit virus increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4421–4524 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citrange backcrosses to sweet orange tended to resemble the sweet orange parent.

Taxon
citrangese0
Material
Backcrossese0
Outcome
behave like the sweet orange parente0
Comparator
sweet orange parente0

Verbatim

e0

“Backcrosses of citranges to sweet oranges show a tendency to behave like the sweet orange parent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4617–4713 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most citrumelos behaved like P. trifoliata.

Taxon
P. trifoliataCitrus trifoliatae0
Material
citrumelose0
Outcome
behaved in most cases as the parent P. trifoliatae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus trifoliata
Citrus trifoliata · TaxonJebulon · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrids between P. trifoliata and grapefruits (citrumelos) have behaved in most cases as the parent P. trifoliata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4715–4828 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tangelos varied between mandarin-like tolerant tissues and grapefruit-like non-tolerant tissues.

Taxon
tangelosCitrus ×tangeloe0
Outcome
tolerant tissuese0
Comparator
grapefruit parente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x tangelo
Citrus ×tangelo · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some tangelos behave Uke the mandarin parent, possessing tolerant tissues ; others behave like the grapefruit parent indicating possession of non-tolerant tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5077–5239 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus was confined to inoculated ringed branches over 16 months, supporting phloem-limited movement.

Treatment
inoculated ringed branchese0
Outcome
carrying the viruse0
Comparator
other branche0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“All buds taken from the inoculated ringed branches were found to be carrying the virus, whereas the buds taken from the other branch of the same plant did not have any virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7408–7581 · show in text ↑