Paper · 2015 · International Journal of Fruit Science

Manipulating Regular Bearing in ‘Golden Delicious’/M9 Apple Trees using GA 4+7 and Ethephon

Ayşe Nilgün Atay; Fatma Koyuncu

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Control of regular cropping in apple is considered critical for fruit growers to ensure their economical sustainability. Irregular flowering can be mitigated by plant growth regulators thanks to their promotion or inhibition effects. In this study, responses of GA4+7 and ethephon on alternate bearing in ‘Golden Delicious’/M9 were examined. GA4+7 and ethephon were applied on the same trees during three consecutive years (2010–12). Flowering, yield, shoot growth, and also some fruit quality parameters were assessed. GA4+7 appeared to be more effectual to regulate alternate bearing. The alternate bearing index calculated with yield in successive years was high in control (0.91), moderate in ethephon (0.71), and low in GA4+7 treated trees (0.41). Modified alternate bearing index, based on cluster number, indicated moderate intensity in GA4+7 (0.53) and high intensity in the others. Although GA4+7 reduced crop density at about 50%, there was little variation in yield per tree and crop efficiency due to increasing of fruit size. GA4+7 did not increase shot length after establishment of equilibrium between vegetative and generative growth in 2012. Ethephon slightly reduced vegetative growth and relatively increased fruit size due to the decrease of fruit set.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield-based alternate-bearing index was 0.91 in controls.

Taxon
treese0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
alternate bearing indexe0
Direction
highe0
Value
0.91e0

Verbatim

e0

“The alternate bearing index calculated with yield in successive years was high in control (0.91), moderate in ethephon (0.71), and low in GA4+7 treated trees (0.41)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–751 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon-treated apple trees had a moderate yield-based alternate-bearing index of 0.71.

Taxon
treese0
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
alternate bearing indexe0
Direction
moderatee0
Value
0.71e0

Verbatim

e0

“The alternate bearing index calculated with yield in successive years was high in control (0.91), moderate in ethephon (0.71), and low in GA4+7 treated trees (0.41)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–751 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA4+7-treated apple trees had a low yield-based alternate-bearing index of 0.41.

Taxon
treese0
Treatment
GA4+7e0
Outcome
alternate bearing indexe0
Direction
lowe0
Value
0.41e0

Verbatim

e0

“The alternate bearing index calculated with yield in successive years was high in control (0.91), moderate in ethephon (0.71), and low in GA4+7 treated trees (0.41)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–751 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cluster-number-based alternate-bearing index was moderate at 0.53 under GA4+7 and high under the other treatments.

Treatment
GA4+7e0
Outcome
Modified alternate bearing indexe0
Direction
moderatee0
Value
0.53e0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Modified alternate bearing index, based on cluster number, indicated moderate intensity in GA4+7 (0.53) and high intensity in the others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA4+7 reduced crop density by about 50%.

Treatment
GA4+7e0
Outcome
crop densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“GA4+7 reduced crop density at about 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–939 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield per tree and crop efficiency varied little under GA4+7 because fruit size increased.

Outcome
yield per tree and crop efficiencye0
Direction
little variatione0
Qualifier
due to increasing of fruit sizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was little variation in yield per tree and crop efficiency due to increasing of fruit size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA4+7 increased fruit size.

Treatment
GA4+7e0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“GA4+7 reduced crop density at about 50%, there was little variation in yield per tree and crop efficiency due to increasing of fruit size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA4+7 did not increase shoot length after vegetative and generative growth reached equilibrium in 2012.

Treatment
GA4+7e0
Outcome
shot lengthe0
Direction
did not increasee0
Qualifier
after establishment of equilibrium between vegetative and generative growth in 2012e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“GA4+7 did not increase shot length after establishment of equilibrium between vegetative and generative growth in 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon slightly reduced vegetative growth.

Treatment
Ethephone0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ethephon slightly reduced vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon relatively increased fruit size.

Treatment
Ethephone0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
relativelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ethephon slightly reduced vegetative growth and relatively increased fruit size due to the decrease of fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon decreased fruit set.

Treatment
Ethephone0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ethephon slightly reduced vegetative growth and relatively increased fruit size due to the decrease of fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1271 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

73 papers: 44 positive, 29 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.