Paper · 2002 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

The effect of inoculum concentration and time of application of various bactericides on the control of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) under artificial inoculation

J. Tsiantos; P. Psallidas

8
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The efficacy of various bactericides for the control of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) in pear flowers was tested. Bactericides were applied preventively one day before, or curatively one or three days after artificial inoculation with pathogen concentrations of 104, 105 and 107 cfu ml-1. The results indicated that a) preventive sprays were more effective than curative sprays; b) the effectiveness of curative sprays decreased progressively from the first to the third day; c) the infection was proportional to inoculum concentration, both in the water–sprayed (control) and in the bactericide–sprayed flowers. There was also significant interaction between bactericide and inoculum concentration. Best results were achieved with streptomycine (Agrept) at 0.5 g and 1 g l-1 H2O; oxolinic acid (S–0208) 1.5 g l-1 H2O; and flumequine (Firestop) 2 ml l-1 H2O. Kasugamycin (Kasumin), phosetyl–Al (Aliette) and copper hydroxide (Kocide) were less effective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preventive sprays controlled fire blight more effectively than curative sprays.

Treatment
preventive sprayse0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorat0pathogen
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
curative sprayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“preventive sprays were more effective than curative sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–379 · show in text ↑
e1

“The efficacy of various bactericides for the control of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) in pear flowers was tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curative spray effectiveness declined between the first and third day after inoculation.

Treatment
curative sprayse0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorat0pathogen
Outcome
effectiveness of curative sprayse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
from the first to the third daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effectiveness of curative sprays decreased progressively from the first to the third day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–476 · show in text ↑
e1

“The efficacy of various bactericides for the control of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) in pear flowers was tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pear flower infection rose with inoculum concentration under water and bactericide sprays.

Treatment
inoculum concentratione0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorat0pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Qualifier
both in the water–sprayed (control) and in the bactericide–sprayed flowerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the infection was proportional to inoculum concentration, both in the water–sprayed (control) and in the bactericide–sprayed flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–613 · show in text ↑
e1

“The efficacy of various bactericides for the control of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) in pear flowers was tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bactericide and inoculum concentration had a significant interaction.

Treatment
bactericide and inoculum concentratione0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorat0pathogen
Outcome
interactione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was also significant interaction between bactericide and inoculum concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“The efficacy of various bactericides for the control of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) in pear flowers was tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomycine at 0.5 and 1 g l-1 H2O gave among the best fire blight control results.

Treatment
streptomycine (Agrept) at 0.5 g and 1 g l-1 H2Oe0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorat0pathogen
Outcome
Best resultse0
Direction
Beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Best results were achieved with streptomycine (Agrept) at 0.5 g and 1 g l-1 H2O”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“The efficacy of various bactericides for the control of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) in pear flowers was tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxolinic acid at 1.5 g l-1 H2O gave among the best fire blight control results.

Treatment
oxolinic acid (S–0208) 1.5 g l-1 H2Oe0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorat0pathogen
Outcome
oxolinic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oxolinic acid (S–0208) 1.5 g l-1 H2O”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–819 · show in text ↑
e1

“The efficacy of various bactericides for the control of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) in pear flowers was tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumequine at 2 ml l-1 H2O gave among the best fire blight control results.

Treatment
flumequine (Firestop) 2 ml l-1 H2Oe0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorat0pathogen
Outcome
flumequinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flumequine (Firestop) 2 ml l-1 H2O”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“The efficacy of various bactericides for the control of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) in pear flowers was tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kasugamycin, phosetyl–Al and copper hydroxide were less effective against fire blight.

Treatment
Kasugamycin (Kasumin), phosetyl–Al (Aliette) and copper hydroxide (Kocide)e0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorat0pathogen
Outcome
less effectivee0
Direction
less effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kasugamycin (Kasumin), phosetyl–Al (Aliette) and copper hydroxide (Kocide) were less effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–955 · show in text ↑
e1

“The efficacy of various bactericides for the control of fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) in pear flowers was tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑

application · Erwinia amylovora · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.