Paper · 1984 · New Phytologist

THE EFFECTS OF ELEVATED CO2 ON PLANTS

K. GARBUTT; F. A. BAZZAZ

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
114
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

S ummary Four populations of Phlox drummondii and one population each of Datura stramonium and Abutilon theophrasti were grown in six growth chambers at 300, 600 and 900 μ l l −1 CO 2 , all other environmental variables remaining constant. Changes in timing and numbers of flowers produced were species‐ and population‐dependent. In general, P. drummondii and D. stramonium flowered earlier under high CO 2 while A. theophrasti was not affected. Significant population × CO 2 interactions were found for several flower production characters in P. drummondii , indicating differential response to elevated CO 2 levels even within a species. In D. stramonium , increased biomass in high CO 2 caused significantly larger fruits to be formed, but there was no significant increase in seed number. In A. theophrasti , individual seed weight increased with increasing CO 2 , but total seed weight per plant remained constant. These results are discussed in relation to their possible implications to plant community structure, and the effects on higher trophic levels (e.g. pollinators and plant predators). Qualitative as well as quantitative changes in plants in response to high CO 2 must be studied with care to ensure correct predictions of the effects of the global rise in CO 2 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phlox drummondii flowered earlier under high carbon dioxide.

Taxon
P. drummondiiPhlox drummondiie0
Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
flowerede0
Direction
earliere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phlox drummondii
Phlox drummondii · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRahulrnath001 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. drummondii and D. stramonium flowered earlier under high CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Datura stramonium flowered earlier under high carbon dioxide.

Taxon
D. stramoniumDatura stramoniume0
Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
flowerede0
Direction
earliere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Datura stramonium
Datura stramonium · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Taka assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. drummondii and D. stramonium flowered earlier under high CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abutilon theophrasti flowering was unaffected by high carbon dioxide.

Taxon
A. theophrastiAbutilon theophrastie0
Treatment
high CO 2e1
Outcome
not affectede0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. theophrasti was not affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“ELEVATED CO2 ON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. drummondii and D. stramonium flowered earlier under high CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–406 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phlox flower production characters varied in carbon dioxide response among populations.

Taxon
P. drummondiiPhlox drummondiie0
Treatment
CO 2e0
Outcome
flower production characterse0
Direction
differential responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phlox drummondii
Phlox drummondii · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRahulrnath001 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant population × CO 2 interactions were found for several flower production characters in P. drummondii , indicating differential response to elevated CO 2 levels even within a species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High carbon dioxide significantly increased Datura fruit size.

Taxon
D. stramoniumDatura stramoniume0
Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
fruitse0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Datura stramonium
Datura stramonium · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Taka assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In D. stramonium , increased biomass in high CO 2 caused significantly larger fruits to be formed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Datura seed number did not increase significantly.

Taxon
D. stramoniumDatura stramoniume1
Treatment
ELEVATED CO2t0
Outcome
seed numbere0
Direction
no significant increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Datura stramonium
Datura stramonium · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Taka assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant increase in seed number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“ELEVATED CO2 ON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. drummondii and D. stramonium flowered earlier under high CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–406 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abutilon individual seed weight rose with carbon dioxide.

Taxon
A. theophrastiAbutilon theophrastie0
Treatment
increasing CO 2e0
Outcome
individual seed weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In A. theophrasti , individual seed weight increased with increasing CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abutilon total seed weight per plant remained constant.

Taxon
A. theophrastiAbutilon theophrastie1
Treatment
ELEVATED CO2t0
Outcome
total seed weight per plante0
Direction
remained constante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total seed weight per plant remained constant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“ELEVATED CO2 ON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“A. theophrasti was not affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–445 · show in text ↑

co2 · yield · Abutilon theophrasti (velvetleaf)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.