Paper · 2015 · Crop and Pasture Science

Influence of biochar application on nutritional quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)

Raffaella Petruccelli; Alessandra Bonetti; Maria Laura Traversi; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
73
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The potential of biochar to improve crop productivity has received interest in recent years; however, little is known about the effects of biochar on crop nutritional quality. In this study, effects of three different biochars (wheat straw biochar, poplar biochar and olive residues biochar) were determined on the major fruit-size parameters, physico-chemical and nutritional properties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cv. Rio Grande. Application of biochar alone was sufficient to sustain the fruit growth, but results were affected by feedstock source of biochar. There were no significant differences in size and weight parameters and the sugar content was not significantly modified by biochar amendment. On the other hand, secondary metabolites showed changes relating to biochar type. Total phenol and flavonoid contents, as well as antioxidant activity, were higher in fruits grown in substrate amended with straw biochar and olive residues biochar. Lycopene, ß carotene and lutein concentrations from tomato fruits grown on substrates amended with different biochars were significantly lower than from the control. The data require confirmation in field experiments; however, this study offers new knowledge about the biochar effects on horticultural crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar applied alone was sufficient to sustain tomato fruit growth.

Treatment
Application of biochar alonee1
Outcome
fruit growthe1
Qualifier
sufficient to sustaine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of three different biochars (wheat straw biochar, poplar biochar and olive residues biochar) were determined on the major fruit-size parameters, physico-chemical and nutritional properties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cv. Rio Grande”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–441 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of biochar alone was sufficient to sustain the fruit growth, but results were affected by feedstock source of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–572 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato results were affected by the feedstock source of biochar.

Treatment
feedstock source of biochare1
Outcome
resultse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of three different biochars (wheat straw biochar, poplar biochar and olive residues biochar) were determined on the major fruit-size parameters, physico-chemical and nutritional properties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cv. Rio Grande”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–441 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of biochar alone was sufficient to sustain the fruit growth, but results were affected by feedstock source of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar amendment did not significantly change tomato fruit size and weight parameters.

Treatment
biochar amendmente2
Outcome
size and weight parameterse2
Direction
no significant differencese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of three different biochars (wheat straw biochar, poplar biochar and olive residues biochar) were determined on the major fruit-size parameters, physico-chemical and nutritional properties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cv. Rio Grande”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–441 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were no significant differences in size and weight parameters and the sugar content was not significantly modified by biochar amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar amendment did not significantly modify tomato sugar content.

Treatment
biochar amendmente2
Outcome
sugar contente2
Direction
not significantly modifiede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of three different biochars (wheat straw biochar, poplar biochar and olive residues biochar) were determined on the major fruit-size parameters, physico-chemical and nutritional properties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cv. Rio Grande”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–441 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were no significant differences in size and weight parameters and the sugar content was not significantly modified by biochar amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–715 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Secondary metabolites of tomato fruit changed according to biochar type.

Treatment
biochar typee3
Outcome
secondary metabolitese3
Direction
changese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of three different biochars (wheat straw biochar, poplar biochar and olive residues biochar) were determined on the major fruit-size parameters, physico-chemical and nutritional properties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cv. Rio Grande”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–441 · show in text ↑
e3

“secondary metabolites showed changes relating to biochar type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit grown in substrate amended with straw or olive residues biochar had higher total phenol and flavonoid contents and antioxidant activity.

Treatment
straw biochar and olive residues biochare4
Outcome
Total phenol and flavonoid contents, as well as antioxidant activitye4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of three different biochars (wheat straw biochar, poplar biochar and olive residues biochar) were determined on the major fruit-size parameters, physico-chemical and nutritional properties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cv. Rio Grande”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–441 · show in text ↑
e4

“Total phenol and flavonoid contents, as well as antioxidant activity, were higher in fruits grown in substrate amended with straw biochar and olive residues biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lycopene, beta-carotene and lutein concentrations in tomato fruit were significantly lower in substrates amended with different biochars than in the control.

Treatment
substrates amended with different biocharse5
Outcome
Lycopene, ß carotene and lutein concentrationse5
Direction
lowere5
Comparator
the controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of three different biochars (wheat straw biochar, poplar biochar and olive residues biochar) were determined on the major fruit-size parameters, physico-chemical and nutritional properties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cv. Rio Grande”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–441 · show in text ↑
e5

“Lycopene, ß carotene and lutein concentrations from tomato fruits grown on substrates amended with different biochars were significantly lower than from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1129 · show in text ↑

other · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

biochar · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

80 papers: 71 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

biochar · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

growing medium · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

other · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 157 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 157 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

biochar · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.