Paper · 2010 · International Journal of Food Science & Technology

Potential of chitosan coating in delaying the postharvest anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz.) of Eksotika II papaya

Asgar Ali; Mahmud Tengku Muda Muhammad; Kamaruzaman Sijam; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
79
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary The in vitro and in vivo fungicidal activity of chitosan was studied against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides , the causal agent of anthracnose in papaya fruits. Chitosan at 1.5% and 2.0% concentrations showed a fungistatic effect with 90–100% inhibition (significant at P ≤ 0.05) of the fungal mycelial growth. Changes in the conidial morphology were also observed with the higher chitosan concentrations after 7‐ h incubation. In vivo studies showed that 1.5% and 2.0% chitosan coatings on papaya not only controlled the fruit decay but also delayed the onset of disease symptoms by 3–4 weeks during 5 weeks storage at 12 ± 1 °C and slowed down the subsequent disease development. However, when leaving the fruits to ripen at ambient temperature (28 ± 2 °C), 2.0% chitosan was less effective than 1.5% in controlling the disease development. Chitosan coatings also delayed the ripening process by maintaining the firmness levels, soluble solids concentration and titratable acidity values during and after storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1.5%, chitosan inhibited fungal mycelial growth by 90–100%.

Taxon
papaya fruitsCarica papayae1
Treatment
Chitosan at 1.5%e0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese2pathogen
Outcome
fungal mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
90–100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan at 1.5% and 2.0% concentrations showed a fungistatic effect with 90–100% inhibition (significant at P ≤ 0.05) of the fungal mycelial growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“papaya fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2.0%, chitosan inhibited fungal mycelial growth by 90–100%.

Taxon
papaya fruitsCarica papayae1
Treatment
2.0% concentrationse0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese2pathogen
Outcome
fungal mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
90–100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan at 1.5% and 2.0% concentrations showed a fungistatic effect with 90–100% inhibition (significant at P ≤ 0.05) of the fungal mycelial growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“papaya fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher chitosan concentrations changed conidial morphology after seven hours.

Taxon
papaya fruitsCarica papayae1
Treatment
higher chitosan concentrationse0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese2pathogen
Outcome
conidial morphologye0
Qualifier
after 7‐ h incubatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in the conidial morphology were also observed with the higher chitosan concentrations after 7‐ h incubation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–434 · show in text ↑
e1

“papaya fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1.5%, chitosan coating controlled papaya fruit decay and delayed symptoms by 3–4 weeks.

Taxon
papayaCarica papayae0
Treatment
1.5%e0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese1pathogen
Outcome
onset of disease symptomse0
Direction
delayede0
Value
3–4 weekse0
Qualifier
during 5 weeks storage at 12 ± 1 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1.5% and 2.0% chitosan coatings on papaya not only controlled the fruit decay but also delayed the onset of disease symptoms by 3–4 weeks during 5 weeks storage at 12 ± 1 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2.0%, chitosan coating delayed papaya disease symptoms by 3–4 weeks.

Taxon
papayaCarica papayae0
Treatment
2.0% chitosan coatingse0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese1pathogen
Outcome
onset of disease symptomse0
Direction
delayede0
Value
3–4 weekse0
Qualifier
during 5 weeks storage at 12 ± 1 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1.5% and 2.0% chitosan coatings on papaya not only controlled the fruit decay but also delayed the onset of disease symptoms by 3–4 weeks during 5 weeks storage at 12 ± 1 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At ambient ripening temperature, 2.0% chitosan controlled papaya disease less effectively than 1.5%.

Taxon
papayaCarica papayae1
Treatment
2.0% chitosane0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese2pathogen
Outcome
controlling the disease developmente0
Direction
less effectivee0
Qualifier
ambient temperature (28 ± 2 °C)e0
Comparator
1.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when leaving the fruits to ripen at ambient temperature (28 ± 2 °C), 2.0% chitosan was less effective than 1.5% in controlling the disease development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–849 · show in text ↑
e1

“anthracnose in papaya fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coatings delayed papaya ripening while maintaining firmness, soluble solids and titratable acidity.

Taxon
papayaCarica papayae1
Treatment
Chitosan coatingse0
Outcome
ripening processe0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
during and after storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan coatings also delayed the ripening process by maintaining the firmness levels, soluble solids concentration and titratable acidity values during and after storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1022 · show in text ↑
e1

“anthracnose in papaya fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–166 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Carica papaya (papaya)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

chitosan · Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · Carica papaya (papaya)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.