Paper · 1999 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Effect of different water supply on plant growth and fruit quality ofLycopersicon esculentum

Ulla Veit-Köhler; Angelika Krumbein; Harald Kosegarten

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
82
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It is well known from earlier work that water stress and salinity results in depressed plant growth and high fruit quality of tomato (e.g. increased sugar and acid levels), but generally is associated with a low marketable fruit yield. In the present work we investigated whether even a small reduction in water supply (without visible symptoms of water stress) also results in a high fruit quality together with high marketable fruit proportions. To characterize fruit quality sugars (glucose and fructose), titratable acids, odour-active aroma volatiles and vitamin C were investigated. Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Vanessa) were grown in soil and with the onset of fruit development water supply was varied (70% and 50% water capacity). In the treatment with lower water supply plant growth, and in particular the number of fruit settings were depressed and the sugar and vitamin C concentrations in the fruits were significantly increased, especially during fruit ripening. Furthermore, with lower water supply the concentrations of titratable acids and of C6 aldehydes (hexanal, (Z)-3-hexenal and (E)-2-hexenal) were significantly increased in the red fruits. Fruit growth was identical in both treatments. The higher levels of sugars, titratable acids, aroma volatiles and vitamin C are responsible for the higher fruit quality under conditions of lower water supply. Since not all fruits of the well watered plants became mature, the marketable yield in both treatments was rather similar and hence, together with a higher fruit quality in the treatment with lower water supply, high proportions of marketable fruits can be harvested. Einfluß einer unterschiedlichen Wasserversorgung auf das Pflanzenwachstum und die Fruchtqualität von Lycopersicon esculentum Es ist durch andere Arbeiten bekannt, dass Wasserstress und Salinität zu einem gehemmten Pflanzenwachstum und hoher Fruchtqualität bei Tomaten (z. B. erhöhten Zucker- und Säurengehalten) führen; allerdings ist der marktfähige Fruchtertrag im allgemeinen reduziert. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde untersucht, ob bereits eine geringfügige Einschränkung der Wasserzufuhr (ohne sichtbare Symptome von Wasserstress) ebenfalls zu einer hohen Fruchtqualität bei gleichzeitig hohem marktfähigen Fruchtertrag führt. Zur Charakterisierung der Fruchtqualität wurden Zucker (Glukose und Fruktose), titrierbare Säuren, flüchtige Aromastoffe und Vitamin C untersucht. Tomatenpflanzen (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Vanessa) wurden im Boden mit Beginn der Fruchtentwicklung bei optimaler und eingeschränkter Wasserversorgung (70% und 50% Wasserkapazität) angezogen. Bei geringerer Wasserversorgung war das Pflanzenwachstum und insbesondere die Zahl der Fruchtstände erniedrigt und die Konzentrationen an Zuckern wie auch an Vitamin C in den Früchten waren signifikant erhöht, und zwar insbesondere zur Reife. Darüberhinaus war bei reduzierter Wasserzufuhr in den reifen Früchten die Konzentration der titrierbaren Säuren und der C6-Aldehyde (Hexanal, (Z)-3-Hexenal und (E)-2-Hexenal) signifikant erhöht. Das Fruchtwachstum war durch die unterschiedliche Wasserzufuhr nicht beeinflusst. Die höheren Konzentrationen an Zuckern, titrierbaren Säuren, an flüchtigen Aromastoffen und an Vitamin C sind für die höhere Fruchtqualität bei geringerer Wasserversorgung verantwortlich. Da nicht alle Früchte in der gut gewässerten Variante zur Ausreife gelangten, war der marktfähige Ertrag bei beiden Wasserstufen praktisch identisch, so dass also in der weniger gewässerten Variante qualitativ höherwertige Früchte ohne Ertragsdepression geerntet werden konnten.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower water supply depressed tomato plant growth relative to 70% water capacity.

Material
cv Vanessae0
Treatment
lower water supplye1
Outcome
plant growthe1
Direction
were depressede1
Comparator
70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Vanessa) were grown in soil and with the onset of fruit development water supply was varied (70% and 50% water capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the treatment with lower water supply plant growth, and in particular the number of fruit settings were depressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower water supply depressed the number of tomato fruit settings relative to 70% water capacity.

Treatment
lower water supplye1
Outcome
number of fruit settingse1
Direction
were depressede1
Comparator
70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Vanessa) were grown in soil and with the onset of fruit development water supply was varied (70% and 50% water capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the treatment with lower water supply plant growth, and in particular the number of fruit settings were depressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower water supply significantly increased sugar and vitamin C concentrations in tomato fruits, especially during ripening.

Treatment
lower water supplye1
Outcome
sugar and vitamin C concentrationse2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Comparator
70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Vanessa) were grown in soil and with the onset of fruit development water supply was varied (70% and 50% water capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the treatment with lower water supply plant growth, and in particular the number of fruit settings were depressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–875 · show in text ↑
e2

“the sugar and vitamin C concentrations in the fruits were significantly increased, especially during fruit ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower water supply significantly increased titratable acids in red tomato fruits.

Treatment
lower water supplye1
Outcome
titratable acidse1
Direction
were significantly increasede1
Comparator
70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Vanessa) were grown in soil and with the onset of fruit development water supply was varied (70% and 50% water capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“Furthermore, with lower water supply the concentrations of titratable acids and of C6 aldehydes (hexanal, (Z)-3-hexenal and (E)-2-hexenal) were significantly increased in the red fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower water supply significantly increased C6 aldehydes in red tomato fruits.

Treatment
lower water supplye1
Outcome
C6 aldehydese1
Direction
were significantly increasede1
Comparator
70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Vanessa) were grown in soil and with the onset of fruit development water supply was varied (70% and 50% water capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“Furthermore, with lower water supply the concentrations of titratable acids and of C6 aldehydes (hexanal, (Z)-3-hexenal and (E)-2-hexenal) were significantly increased in the red fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit growth was identical under lower and 70% water supply.

Treatment
lower water supplye1
Outcome
Fruit growthe2
Direction
identicale2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Vanessa) were grown in soil and with the onset of fruit development water supply was varied (70% and 50% water capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the treatment with lower water supply plant growth, and in particular the number of fruit settings were depressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–875 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit growth was identical in both treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1229 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher levels of sugars, titratable acids, aroma volatiles and vitamin C are responsible for the higher fruit quality under lower water supply.

Compound
sugarse1
Outcome
higher fruit qualitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Vanessa) were grown in soil and with the onset of fruit development water supply was varied (70% and 50% water capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“The higher levels of sugars, titratable acids, aroma volatiles and vitamin C are responsible for the higher fruit quality under conditions of lower water supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1391 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable yield was rather similar in tomato under both water supply treatments.

Treatment
lower water supplye1
Outcome
marketable yielde2
Qualifier
rather similare2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Vanessa) were grown in soil and with the onset of fruit development water supply was varied (70% and 50% water capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the treatment with lower water supply plant growth, and in particular the number of fruit settings were depressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–875 · show in text ↑
e2

“the marketable yield in both treatments was rather similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With lower water supply, high proportions of marketable tomato fruits can be harvested together with higher fruit quality.

Treatment
lower water supplye1
Outcome
high proportions of marketable fruitse1
Qualifier
together with a higher fruit qualitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Vanessa) were grown in soil and with the onset of fruit development water supply was varied (70% and 50% water capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“together with a higher fruit quality in the treatment with lower water supply, high proportions of marketable fruits can be harvested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1659 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 33 positive, 18 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 106 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.