Paper · 2005 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effect of storage temperature and size of stalks on quality of minimally processed leeks

Pavlos Tsouvaltzis; Dimitrios Gerasopoulos; Anastasios S Siomos

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Minimally processed leek stalks were produced by trimming of freshly harvested leeks ( Allium porrum L.) to sizes of 0–22, 0–11 and 11–22 cm. Trimmed stalks were then stored at 0, 10 and 20 °C in air for 8 days to determine the effects of temperature and stalk size on quality during storage, including inner leaf growth, fresh weight loss and discoloration. Both inner leaf growth and fresh weight loss were increased linearly with storage duration. Growth of cut leek inner leaves was significantly reduced to 4 mm at the end of 0 °C storage in all three types of cut stalks. Inner leaf growth was maximized during storage at 10 and 20 °C in 0–11 cm stalks, medium in 0–22 cm stalks and minimal in 11–22 cm stalks. Fresh weight loss of 0–11 cm size was significantly higher than that of 0–22 cm size at both 0 and 10 °C, whereas there was no difference between 0–11 and 11–22 cm sizes. At 10 and 20 °C the 0–11 cm size lost more weight than the 11–22 and 0–22 cm ones. Differences in color attributes were observed in most cases between stalk sizes, due to different coloration of intact leeks. Discoloration was observed particularly at the stalk base at 20 °C. Low temperatures effectively control discoloration, and reduce considerably inner leaf growth of minimally processed leeks, but do not control it. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inner leaf growth increased linearly over storage time.

Outcome
inner leaf growthe0
Direction
increased linearlye0
Setting
storage duratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both inner leaf growth and fresh weight loss were increased linearly with storage duration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“leeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh weight loss increased linearly over storage time.

Outcome
fresh weight losse0
Direction
increased linearlye0
Setting
storage duratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both inner leaf growth and fresh weight loss were increased linearly with storage duration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“leeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0 °C, cut leek inner leaves grew only 4 mm after storage, across all three stalk sizes.

Organ / stage
inner leavese0
Treatment
0 °C storagee0
Outcome
Growth of cut leek inner leavese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4 mme0
Qualifier
all three types of cut stalkse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of cut leek inner leaves was significantly reduced to 4 mm at the end of 0 °C storage in all three types of cut stalks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–586 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 and 20 °C, inner leaf growth was greatest in 0–11 cm stalks, intermediate in 0–22 cm stalks, and least in 11–22 cm stalks.

Material
0–11 cm stalkse0
Organ / stage
Inner leafe0
Outcome
Inner leaf growthe0
Direction
maximizede0
Qualifier
during storage at 10 and 20 °Ce0
Comparator
0–22 cm stalkse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inner leaf growth was maximized during storage at 10 and 20 °C in 0–11 cm stalks, medium in 0–22 cm stalks and minimal in 11–22 cm stalks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“leeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0 and 10 °C, 0–11 cm leek stalks lost significantly more fresh weight than 0–22 cm stalks.

Material
0–11 cm sizee0
Outcome
Fresh weight losse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at both 0 and 10 °Ce0
Comparator
0–22 cm sizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh weight loss of 0–11 cm size was significantly higher than that of 0–22 cm size at both 0 and 10 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“leeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0–11 cm and 11–22 cm sizes did not differ in fresh weight loss in the stated comparison.

Material
0–11e0
Outcome
Fresh weight losse1
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
11–22 cm sizese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no difference between 0–11 and 11–22 cm sizes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–895 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh weight loss of 0–11 cm size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“leeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 and 20 °C, 0–11 cm stalks lost more weight than 11–22 and 0–22 cm stalks.

Material
0–11 cm sizee0
Outcome
lost more weighte0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
At 10 and 20 °Ce0
Comparator
11–22 and 0–22 cm onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 10 and 20 °C the 0–11 cm size lost more weight than the 11–22 and 0–22 cm ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“leeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Color attributes generally differed by stalk size, reflecting original leek coloration.

Material
stalk sizese0
Outcome
color attributese0
Direction
Differencese0
Qualifier
in most casese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in color attributes were observed in most cases between stalk sizes, due to different coloration of intact leeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 °C, discoloration was especially evident at the stalk base.

Organ / stage
stalk basee0
Outcome
Discoloratione0
Qualifier
at 20 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Discoloration was observed particularly at the stalk base at 20 °C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“leeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low storage temperatures controlled discoloration of minimally processed leeks.

Treatment
Low temperaturese0
Outcome
discoloratione0
Direction
controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low temperatures effectively control discoloration, and reduce considerably inner leaf growth of minimally processed leeks, but do not control it.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low storage temperatures considerably reduced, but did not eliminate, inner leaf growth.

Treatment
Low temperaturese0
Outcome
inner leaf growthe0
Direction
reduce considerablye0
Qualifier
but do not control ite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium ampeloprasum
Allium ampeloprasum · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low temperatures effectively control discoloration, and reduce considerably inner leaf growth of minimally processed leeks, but do not control it.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1320 · show in text ↑

storage · growth · Allium ampeloprasum (leek)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.