Paper · 2005 · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

Atmospheric CO2 concentration effects on N partitioning and fertilizer N recovery in field grown rice (Oryza sativa L.)

W.M.W. Weerakoon; K.T. Ingram; D.N. Moss

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Lowland rice ( Oryza sativa L.) responds positively to increased atmospheric CO 2 concentration. However, the efficiency of the canopy depends on the N status of the plant, which could vary with the change in uptake and partitioning of N with increased atmospheric CO 2 . A field experiment was conducted at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) to determine changes in N requirement of the rice crop and to propose suitable management strategies to overcome tissue N dilution with increased CO 2 concentration. Rice variety IR72 was grown inside open top chambers at ambient (about 350 μmol mol −1 ) or elevated (700 μmol mol −1 ) atmospheric CO 2 in combination with three levels of applied N (0, 90, or 200 kg N ha −1 ). Rooting of rice was linearly related to tillering, and the relationship did not change with CO 2 concentrations, but with age of the crop. When adequate N was not supplied, rice plants grown at high CO 2 became inferior to plants grown at ambient CO 2 . N uptake and fertilizer N recovery was higher in plants grown in high CO 2 until maximum tillering, but the partitioning of N towards leaves decreased by 9%. Acclimation to high CO 2 by rice may, therefore, be dependent on the N uptake. Increased N uptake under high CO 2 environment was related to its larger root system , which was due to increased unproductive tillering. This suggests that if tillering is limited, rice plants at high CO 2 may suffer from N limitation due to changes in both uptake and partitioning. It is concluded that management of the rice crop grown at high atmospheric CO 2 should be different to that under current conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice rooting was linearly related to tillering.

Organ / stage
tilleringe0
Outcome
Rootinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rooting of rice was linearly related to tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–784 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rooting and tillering relationship did not change with CO2 concentration.

Treatment
CO 2 concentrationse0
Outcome
relationshipe0
Direction
did not changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relationship did not change with CO 2 concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–846 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rooting of rice was linearly related to tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–784 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rooting and tillering relationship changed with crop age.

Organ / stage
age of the crope0
Outcome
relationshipe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relationship did not change with CO 2 concentrations, but with age of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–872 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rooting of rice was linearly related to tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without adequate N, rice at high CO2 became inferior to ambient CO2 rice.

Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
became inferiore0
Direction
inferiore0
Qualifier
When adequate N was not suppliede0
Comparator
ambient CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When adequate N was not supplied, rice plants grown at high CO 2 became inferior to plants grown at ambient CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake was higher at high CO2 until maximum tillering.

Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
until maximum tilleringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake and fertilizer N recovery was higher in plants grown in high CO 2 until maximum tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1087 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rooting of rice was linearly related to tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N recovery was higher at high CO2 until maximum tillering.

Treatment
high CO 2e0
Outcome
fertilizer N recoverye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
until maximum tilleringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake and fertilizer N recovery was higher in plants grown in high CO 2 until maximum tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1087 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rooting of rice was linearly related to tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N partitioning toward leaves decreased by 9% at high CO2.

Treatment
high CO 2e1
Outcome
partitioning of N towards leavese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the partitioning of N towards leaves decreased by 9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1145 · show in text ↑
e1

“N uptake and fertilizer N recovery was higher in plants grown in high CO 2 until maximum tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1087 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rooting of rice was linearly related to tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–784 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger root systems at high CO2 were related to increased N uptake.

Organ / stage
root systeme0
Outcome
Increased N uptakee0
Direction
Increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased N uptake under high CO 2 environment was related to its larger root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1310 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rooting of rice was linearly related to tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–784 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased unproductive tillering enlarged rice root systems.

Outcome
larger root systeme0
Qualifier
increased unproductive tilleringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its larger root system , which was due to increased unproductive tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1362 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rooting of rice was linearly related to tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–784 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend different rice management at high atmospheric CO2.

Outcome
management of the rice crop grown at high atmospheric CO 2 should be different to that under current conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management of the rice crop grown at high atmospheric CO 2 should be different to that under current conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1642 · show in text ↑

co2 · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 26 positive, 28 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.