Paper · 2011 · Drying Technology

Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Electrohydrodynamic, Oven, and Ambient Air on Carrot Cylindrical Slices during Drying Process

A. A. Alemrajabi; F. Rezaee; M. Mirhosseini; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
107
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) drying is a novel method of nonthermal drying. A corona discharge using multiple electrodes and a high-voltage electric field of 5.2 kV · cm−1 was produced to investigate the drying enhancement of carrot slices and its effect on color and shrinkage. The EHD setup consisted of 13 stainless steel needle points connected to a DC power supply and a stainless steel plate. EHD+ drying, EHD− drying, oven drying at 55°C, and ambient air drying control at 25°C for 5 h resulted in 79.5, 77.7, 77, and 22.5% total moisture removal from the fresh carrot slices, respectively. The final shrinkage of the EHD± drying was less than that of oven drying but was higher than that of ambient air drying. It was estimated that the energy consumption of oven drying was several times greater than those of EHD± drying. The conventional drying processes changed all color parameters, whereas the color for EHD± dried samples remained almost the same. The carrot slices’ temperature during drying by EHD± was significantly less than that of those dried by oven and ambient air drying.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EHD+ drying removed 79.5% total moisture in 5 h, compared with 22.5% under ambient air drying control.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
EHD+ dryinge1
Outcome
total moisture removale1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
79.5e1
Qualifier
22.5%e1
Comparator
ambient air drying control at 25°Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carrot Cylindrical Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“EHD+ drying, EHD− drying, oven drying at 55°C, and ambient air drying control at 25°C for 5 h resulted in 79.5, 77.7, 77, and 22.5% total moisture removal from the fresh carrot slices, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EHD− drying removed 77.7% total moisture in 5 h, compared with 22.5% under ambient air drying control.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
EHD− dryinge1
Outcome
total moisture removale1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
77.7e1
Qualifier
22.5%e1
Comparator
ambient air drying control at 25°Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carrot Cylindrical Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“EHD+ drying, EHD− drying, oven drying at 55°C, and ambient air drying control at 25°C for 5 h resulted in 79.5, 77.7, 77, and 22.5% total moisture removal from the fresh carrot slices, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oven drying at 55°C removed 77% total moisture in 5 h, compared with 22.5% under ambient air drying control.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
oven drying at 55°Ce1
Outcome
total moisture removale1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
77e1
Qualifier
22.5%e1
Comparator
ambient air drying control at 25°Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carrot Cylindrical Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“EHD+ drying, EHD− drying, oven drying at 55°C, and ambient air drying control at 25°C for 5 h resulted in 79.5, 77.7, 77, and 22.5% total moisture removal from the fresh carrot slices, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final shrinkage of EHD± dried carrot slices was less than that of oven drying.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
EHD± dryinge2
Outcome
final shrinkagee2
Direction
lesse2
Comparator
oven dryinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carrot Cylindrical Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“The final shrinkage of the EHD± drying was less than that of oven drying but was higher than that of ambient air drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final shrinkage of EHD± dried carrot slices was higher than that of ambient air drying.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
EHD± dryinge2
Outcome
final shrinkagee2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
ambient air dryinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carrot Cylindrical Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“The final shrinkage of the EHD± drying was less than that of oven drying but was higher than that of ambient air drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oven drying was estimated to use several times more energy than EHD± drying.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
oven dryinge3
Outcome
energy consumptione3
Direction
greatere3
Value
several timese3
Comparator
EHD± dryinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carrot Cylindrical Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–112 · show in text ↑
e3

“It was estimated that the energy consumption of oven drying was several times greater than those of EHD± drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional drying processes changed all color parameters of carrot slices.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
conventional drying processese4
Outcome
all color parameterse4
Direction
changede4
Comparator
EHD± dried samplese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carrot Cylindrical Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“The conventional drying processes changed all color parameters, whereas the color for EHD± dried samples remained almost the same”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Color of EHD± dried carrot slices remained almost the same, unlike conventional drying.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
EHD±e4
Outcome
colore4
Direction
remained almost the samee4
Comparator
conventional drying processese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carrot Cylindrical Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“The conventional drying processes changed all color parameters, whereas the color for EHD± dried samples remained almost the same”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrot slice temperature during EHD± drying was significantly less than during oven and ambient air drying.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
EHD±e5
Outcome
temperature during dryinge5
Direction
lesse5
Comparator
oven and ambient air dryinge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carrot Cylindrical Slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–112 · show in text ↑
e5

“The carrot slices’ temperature during drying by EHD± was significantly less than that of those dried by oven and ambient air drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1091 · show in text ↑

processing · soil: physics · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.