Abstract
Shoot regeneration capacities of 21 different lentil genotypes were tested on MS medium containing 0.225 μM thidazuron (TDZ) using cotyledonary node explants. It was observed that 0.225 μM TDZ contributed positively in multiple shoot regeneration from cotyledonary node based calli. The highest frequency of shoot regeneration (20.6 shoots/explants) was achieved from Ahn 362 genotype. Regenerated shoots were excised and cultured in MS medium supplemented with 1.25 μM IBA for rooting. However, root formation was not achieved on most of the regenerated shoots. To overcome this problem, regenerated shoots of seven most promising genotypes were micrografted on 3–4 days old root stocks of cultivar Kayi 91 succesfully. Micrografted plantlets were acclimatized to ambient conditions and later established under greenhouse conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Thidazuron at 0.225 μM contributed positively to multiple shoot regeneration from cotyledonary node based calli in lentil.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Organ / stage
- cotyledonary node based callie0
- Treatment
- 0.225 μM TDZe0
- Outcome
- multiple shoot regeneratione0
- Direction
- contributed positivelye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“It was observed that 0.225 μM TDZ contributed positively in multiple shoot regeneration from cotyledonary node based calli”
t0“Lentil (Lens CulinarisMedik)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest frequency of shoot regeneration (20.6 shoots/explants) was achieved from lentil genotype Ahn 362.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Material
- Ahn 362e0
- Outcome
- frequency of shoot regeneratione0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 20.6 shoots/explantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest frequency of shoot regeneration (20.6 shoots/explants) was achieved from Ahn 362 genotype”
t0“Lentil (Lens CulinarisMedik)”
Claim · model-written summary
Root formation was not achieved on most of the regenerated lentil shoots cultured on MS medium with 1.25 μM IBA.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Outcome
- root formation was not achieved on most of the regenerated shootse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“root formation was not achieved on most of the regenerated shoots”
t0“Lentil (Lens CulinarisMedik)”
Claim · model-written summary
Regenerated shoots of seven promising lentil genotypes were successfully micrografted on 3-4 days old root stocks of cultivar Kayi 91.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Material
- Kayi 91e0
- Outcome
- micrografted on 3–4 days old root stocks of cultivar Kayi 91 succesfullye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“regenerated shoots of seven most promising genotypes were micrografted on 3–4 days old root stocks of cultivar Kayi 91 succesfully”
t0“Lentil (Lens CulinarisMedik)”
Claim · model-written summary
Micrografted lentil plantlets were acclimatized to ambient conditions and later established under greenhouse conditions.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Outcome
- established under greenhouse conditionse0
- Setting
- greenhouse conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Micrografted plantlets were acclimatized to ambient conditions and later established under greenhouse conditions”
t0“Lentil (Lens CulinarisMedik)”
The same questions in other papers
Thidiazuron · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.