Paper · 2014 · Biologia Plantarum

Expression of genes related to flavonoid and stilbene synthesis as affected by signaling chemicals and Botrytis cinerea in grapevines

S. Y. Ahn; S. A. Kim; K. S. Cho; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that the expression of genes related to the synthesis of flavonoids, such as the phenylalanineammonia lyase (PAL), chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), and stilbene synthase (STS) genes were induced in response to different signaling molecules and Botrytis cinerea inoculation in grapevine leaves. Therefore, in the present study, the nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of STS genes from cultivars Campbell Early and Kyoho were compared. The deduced amino acid sequences of VlKSTS12, VlKSTS11, VICESTS13, and VlKSTS1 showed 100 % homology to VlCESTS12, VlCESTS11, VICESTS24, and VlKSTS13, respectively, in Campbell Early and Kyoho. In addition, the maximum transcription was observed 6 h after chemical treatments. In Campbell Early, the transcription of PAL, CHS, and CHI was higher in leaves treated with ethephon than in those treated with hydrogen peroxide, methyl jasmonate, and salicylic acid. The PAL, CHS, and CHI genes were more induced in Campbell Early than in Kyoho. The mRNA content of STS genes started to increase at 6 h and peaked at 48 h after the treatments. In Kyoho leaves, the expression of STSs was highly up-regulated at 1 h and peaked at 6 h after the treatments. The expression of the STS genes was induced in both the cultivars in leaves inoculated with B. cinerea. STS11 and STS12 showed differential expression patterns from STS1, STS24, and STS13 in Campbell Early leaves inoculated with B. cinerea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deduced amino acid sequences of VlKSTS12, VlKSTS11, VICESTS13 and VlKSTS1 showed 100 % homology to VlCESTS12, VlCESTS11, VICESTS24 and VlKSTS13, respectively, in Campbell Early and Kyoho.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
Campbell Early and Kyohoe0
Gene
VlKSTS12, VlKSTS11, VICESTS13, and VlKSTS1e0
Outcome
homologye0
Value
100 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The deduced amino acid sequences of VlKSTS12, VlKSTS11, VICESTS13, and VlKSTS1 showed 100 % homology to VlCESTS12, VlCESTS11, VICESTS24, and VlKSTS13, respectively, in Campbell Early and Kyoho”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum transcription was observed 6 h after the chemical treatments.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
chemical treatmentse0
Outcome
maximum transcriptione0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
6 h aftere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum transcription was observed 6 h after chemical treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Campbell Early leaves, transcription of PAL, CHS and CHI was higher with ethephon than with hydrogen peroxide, methyl jasmonate or salicylic acid.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
Campbell Earlye0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
ethephone0
Gene
PAL, CHS, and CHIe0
Outcome
transcriptione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
hydrogen peroxide, methyl jasmonate, and salicylic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Campbell Early, the transcription of PAL, CHS, and CHI was higher in leaves treated with ethephon than in those treated with hydrogen peroxide, methyl jasmonate, and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PAL, CHS and CHI genes were more induced in Campbell Early than in Kyoho.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
Campbell Earlye0
Gene
PAL, CHS, and CHIe0
Outcome
more inducede0
Comparator
Kyohoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PAL, CHS, and CHI genes were more induced in Campbell Early than in Kyoho”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mRNA content of STS genes started to increase at 6 h and peaked at 48 h after the treatments.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Gene
STS genese0
Outcome
mRNA contente0
Qualifier
started to increase at 6 h and peaked at 48 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mRNA content of STS genes started to increase at 6 h and peaked at 48 h after the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Kyoho leaves, STS expression was highly up-regulated at 1 h and peaked at 6 h after the treatments.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
Kyohoe0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Gene
STSse0
Outcome
expressione0
Qualifier
highly up-regulated at 1 h and peaked at 6 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Kyoho leaves, the expression of STSs was highly up-regulated at 1 h and peaked at 6 h after the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STS gene expression was induced in both cultivars in leaves inoculated with B. cinerea.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
inoculated with B. cinereae0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Gene
STS genese0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression of the STS genes was induced in both the cultivars in leaves inoculated with B. cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STS11 and STS12 showed expression patterns differing from STS1, STS24 and STS13 in Campbell Early leaves inoculated with B. cinerea.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
Campbell Earlye0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Gene
STS11 and STS12e0
Outcome
differential expression patternse0
Qualifier
STS1, STS24, and STS13e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“STS11 and STS12 showed differential expression patterns from STS1, STS24, and STS13 in Campbell Early leaves inoculated with B. cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑

Botrytis cinerea · molecular: expression · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · molecular: expression · VitisResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · molecular: expression · VitisPositive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.