Paper · 1979 · Agronomy Journal

Establishing Wheat After Soybeans in Double‐Cropping1

J. O. Sanford

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A method whereby wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) can be sown earlier would be a distinct advantage in a wheatsoybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.) double‐cropping system. ‘Abe’ wheat overseeded in standing soybeans about 1 October was compared with conventionally seeded wheat after soybean harvest (1 to 10 November). Wheat overseeded consistently outyielded the conventionally seeded wheat. The optimum seeding rate for overseeding wheat was 101 kg/ha. Overseeded wheat failed during 1 of 4 years, because the soybean canopy was only 50% closed because of late planting (15 July). The growth regulator, 2, 3, 5‐triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA) was applied to ‘Bragg’ soybeans at different growth stages to create canopies with varying degrees of closure. Plots with these different canopies were overseeded with ‘Abe’ wheat at a rate of 134 kg/ha about 1 October (when the topmost soybean leaves began to turn yellow). Emergence and yield of wheat were significantly greater when no TIBA was applied (completely closed canopy) than when TIBA was applied and the canopy was not completely closed. Overseeding wheat in standing soybeans in double‐cropping was found to be an acceptable method of establishing the wheat crop However, emergence and yields of wheat can be expected to be reduced when the soybean canopy is less than completely closed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overseeded wheat consistently yielded more than conventionally seeded wheat.

Treatment
overseedede0
Outcome
outyieldede0
Direction
outyieldede0
Comparator
conventionally seeded wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat overseeded consistently outyielded the conventionally seeded wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–394 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum overseeding rate for wheat was 101 kg/ha.

Outcome
optimum seeding ratee0
Value
101 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimum seeding rate for overseeding wheat was 101 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overseeded wheat failed in one of four years when the soybean canopy was only 50% closed.

Outcome
failede0
Value
1 of 4 yearse0
Qualifier
soybean canopy was only 50% closede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overseeded wheat failed during 1 of 4 years, because the soybean canopy was only 50% closed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat emergence was significantly greater under a closed untreated soybean canopy than under a TIBA-treated incomplete canopy.

Treatment
no TIBA was appliede0
Outcome
Emergencee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
TIBA was appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emergence and yield of wheat were significantly greater when no TIBA was applied (completely closed canopy) than when TIBA was applied and the canopy was not completely closed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was significantly greater under a closed untreated soybean canopy than under a TIBA-treated incomplete canopy.

Treatment
no TIBA was appliede0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
TIBA was appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Emergence and yield of wheat were significantly greater when no TIBA was applied (completely closed canopy) than when TIBA was applied and the canopy was not completely closed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1093 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered overseeding in standing soybeans acceptable for wheat establishment.

Outcome
acceptable method of establishing the wheat crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overseeding wheat in standing soybeans in double‐cropping was found to be an acceptable method of establishing the wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1220 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat emergence is expected to decline when soybean canopy closure is incomplete.

Treatment
soybean canopye0
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
soybean canopy is less than completely closede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emergence and yields of wheat can be expected to be reduced when the soybean canopy is less than completely closed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1344 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield is expected to decline when soybean canopy closure is incomplete.

Treatment
soybean canopye0
Outcome
yields of wheate0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
soybean canopy is less than completely closede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emergence and yields of wheat can be expected to be reduced when the soybean canopy is less than completely closed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1344 · show in text ↑

2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.