Paper · 1973 · Annals of Botany

Effects of Kinetin on Tiller Bud Elongation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

R. H. M. LANGER; P. C. PRASAD; H. M. LAUDE

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
66
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments are described in which at four stages of development main tillers of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were isolated and inserted in test-tubes containing distilled water or kinetin. Leaves and leaf sheaths were split off to expose a lateral bud approximately 3 mm long whose growth was measured during a period of 8 days. Kinetin at 6 ppm promoted bud elongation and dry-weight gain at all stages of development and in different light intensities and photoperiods. Reducing assimilate supply either by partial defoliation of the main tiller or treatment with DCMU inhibited bud growth during the early part of development, an effect which was relieved by kinetin. TIBA applied to prevent auxin transport increased bud growth at the first two but not later stages of development. Kinetin also inhibited nodal root growth consistently. At least two phases of bud control in grasses have to be considered, the first being the imposition of apical dominance after initiation of floral organs and stem elongation, the second being the release of buds from inhibition around ear emergence. Imposition of bud inhibition appears to be a function of auxin and assimilate supply, and at this stage the promoting effects of kinetin may be through its action of mobilizing flow of assimilates. The release of buds at a later stage is apparently not associated with auxin, and kinetin may no longer be concerned with assimilate flow but rather with overcoming an inhibitory effect on bud growth emanating from the leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin at 6 ppm promoted bud elongation at all stages and light regimes.

Treatment
Kinetin at 6 ppme0
Outcome
bud elongatione0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
at all stages of development and in different light intensities and photoperiodse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kinetin at 6 ppm promoted bud elongation and dry-weight gain at all stages of development and in different light intensities and photoperiods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin at 6 ppm promoted bud dry-weight gain.

Treatment
Kinetin at 6 ppme0
Outcome
dry-weight gaine0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kinetin at 6 ppm promoted bud elongation and dry-weight gain at all stages of development and in different light intensities and photoperiods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial defoliation inhibited early bud growth.

Treatment
partial defoliation of the main tillere0
Outcome
bud growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
during the early part of developmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing assimilate supply either by partial defoliation of the main tiller or treatment with DCMU inhibited bud growth during the early part of development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DCMU treatment inhibited early bud growth.

Treatment
treatment with DCMUe0
Outcome
bud growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing assimilate supply either by partial defoliation of the main tiller or treatment with DCMU inhibited bud growth during the early part of development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin relieved the early bud growth inhibition associated with reduced assimilate supply.

Treatment
kinetine0
Outcome
bud growthe0
Direction
relievede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibited bud growth during the early part of development, an effect which was relieved by kinetin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TIBA increased bud growth at the first two stages.

Treatment
TIBA applied to prevent auxin transporte0
Outcome
bud growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at the first twoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TIBA applied to prevent auxin transport increased bud growth at the first two but not later stages of development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TIBA did not increase bud growth at later stages.

Treatment
TIBA applied to prevent auxin transporte0
Outcome
bud growthe0
Qualifier
not later stages of developmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TIBA applied to prevent auxin transport increased bud growth at the first two but not later stages of development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin consistently inhibited nodal root growth.

Treatment
Kinetine0
Outcome
nodal root growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kinetin also inhibited nodal root growth consistently”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors describe bud control as apical dominance after floral initiation and stem elongation.

Organ / stage
floral organse0
Outcome
imposition of apical dominancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the first being the imposition of apical dominance after initiation of floral organs and stem elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors describe a second control phase as bud release around ear emergence.

Organ / stage
eare0
Outcome
release of buds from inhibitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the second being the release of buds from inhibition around ear emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest auxin and assimilate supply impose bud inhibition.

Compound
auxine0
Outcome
bud inhibitione0
Qualifier
assimilate supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imposition of bud inhibition appears to be a function of auxin and assimilate supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest kinetin promotes buds by mobilizing assimilate flow.

Treatment
kinetine0
Outcome
promoting effectse0
Qualifier
mobilizing flow of assimilatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promoting effects of kinetin may be through its action of mobilizing flow of assimilates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest later bud release is not associated with auxin.

Compound
auxine0
Outcome
release of buds at a later stagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“release of buds at a later stage is apparently not associated with auxin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest kinetin overcomes leaf-derived inhibition at later stages.

Treatment
kinetine0
Outcome
bud growthe0
Qualifier
inhibitory effect on bud growth emanating from the leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kinetin may no longer be concerned with assimilate flow but rather with overcoming an inhibitory effect on bud growth emanating from the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑

kinetin · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pruning · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 10 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

class · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 208 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.