Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No-till generally enhanced root length growth more than aboveground growth relative to conventional tillage.

A claim from Conservation Tillage Affects Root Growth of Dryland Spring Wheat under Drought · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till generally enhanced root length growth more than aboveground growth relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
RLGe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to CT, NT generally enhanced RLG more than aboveground growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–827
e1

“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–329

Title

Conservation Tillage Affects Root Growth of Dryland Spring Wheat under Drought

S. D. Merrill; A. L. Black; A. Bauer Soil Science Society of America Journal 1996. doi:10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000020034x

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-9a6526331ff726ead31fbea48c195227a7a97feb14ec6cab08876c9b65503fea · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this claim · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.