Claim · model-written summary
No-till generally enhanced root length growth more than aboveground growth relative to conventional tillage.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Relative to CT, NT generally enhanced RLG more than aboveground growth”
e1“Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”
Title
Conservation Tillage Affects Root Growth of Dryland Spring Wheat under Drought
S. D. Merrill; A. L. Black; A. Bauer Soil Science Society of America Journal 1996. doi:10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000020034x
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Observation Root length growth averaged 65 km/cm 2 in 1988.
- Observation Root length growth averaged 130 km/cm 2 in 1989.
- Observation Root length growth averaged 145 km/cm 2 in 1990.
- Intervention effect In 1988, no-till root length growth was 37% greater than minimal tillage, with conventional tillage intermediate.
- Intervention effect In 1989, no-till root length growth was 40% greater than conventional tillage, with minimal tillage intermediate.
- Intervention effect In 1990, no-till root length growth was 112% greater than conventional tillage.
- Observation Final wheat biomass averaged 380 kg/ha in 1988.
- Observation Final wheat biomass averaged 1730 kg/ha in 1989.
- Observation Final wheat biomass averaged 3090 kg/ha in 1990.
- Intervention effect No-till final biomass was 36% greater than conventional tillage in 1988.
- Intervention effect No-till final biomass was not significantly different from conventional tillage in 1989.
- Intervention effect No-till final biomass was 44% greater than conventional tillage in 1990.
- Observation Wheat roots penetrated 1.1 m or less in dry subsoil.
- Intervention effect Wheat roots reached greater soil depths under no-till than under minimal or conventional tillage each year.
- Observation Stored soil water amounts were generally not significantly different among tillage treatments.
- Intervention effect More soil water was depleted under no-till than conventional tillage in 1990.
- Mechanism Cooler soil under no-till and near-surface water conservation appear to confer a wheat root-growth advantage.