Paper · 2015 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Influence of Cultivar and Harvest Year on the Volatile Profiles of Leaves and Roots of Carrots (Daucus carota spp. sativus Hoffm.)

Detlef Ulrich; Thomas Nothnagel; Hartwig Schulz

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The focus of the present work centers on the diversity of volatile patterns of carrots. In total 15 main volatiles were semiquantified in leaves and roots using isolation by headspace solid phase microextraction followed by gas chromatography with FID and MS detection. Significant differences in the main number of compounds were detected between the cultivars as well as the years. Genotype-environment interactions (G × E) are discussed. The most abundant metabolites, β-myrcene (leaves) and terpinolene (roots), differ in the sum of all interactions (cultivar × harvest year) by a factor of 22 and 62, respectively. A statistical test indicates significant metabolic differences between cultivars for nine volatiles in leaves and 10 in roots. In contrast to others the volatiles α-pinene, γ-terpinene, limonene, and myristicine in leaves as well as β-pinene, humulene, and bornyl acetate in roots are relatively stable over years. A correlation analysis shows no strict clustering regarding root color. While the biosynthesis in leaves and roots is independent between these two organs for nine of the 15 volatiles, a significant correlation of the myristicine content between leaves and roots was determined, which suggests the use of this compound as a bitter marker in carrot breeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The main number of volatiles differed significantly among cultivars and years.

Taxon
compoundse0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
main number of compoundse0
Direction
differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences in the main number of compounds were detected between the cultivars as well as the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–383 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf β-myrcene varied 22-fold across cultivar and harvest-year combinations.

Material
cultivare0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
β-myrcenee0
Direction
differe0
Value
22e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“β-myrcene (leaves) and terpinolene (roots), differ in the sum of all interactions (cultivar × harvest year) by a factor of 22 and 62, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–619 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root terpinolene varied 62-fold across cultivar and harvest-year combinations.

Material
cultivare0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
terpinolenee0
Direction
differe0
Value
62e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“β-myrcene (leaves) and terpinolene (roots), differ in the sum of all interactions (cultivar × harvest year) by a factor of 22 and 62, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–619 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine leaf volatiles differed significantly among cultivars.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
volatiles in leavese0
Direction
differencese0
Value
ninee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“significant metabolic differences between cultivars for nine volatiles in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–729 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten root volatiles differed significantly among cultivars.

Outcome
rootse0
Value
10e0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialDirection

Verbatim

e0

“10 in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–745 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several leaf volatiles were relatively stable across years.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
α-pinene, γ-terpinene, limonene, and myristicine in leavese0
Direction
relatively stablee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“α-pinene, γ-terpinene, limonene, and myristicine in leaves as well as β-pinene, humulene, and bornyl acetate in roots are relatively stable over years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–934 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several root volatiles were relatively stable across years.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
β-pinene, humulene, and bornyl acetate in rootse0
Direction
relatively stablee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“β-pinene, humulene, and bornyl acetate in roots are relatively stable over years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–934 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatile profiles showed no strict clustering by root color.

Organ / stage
root colore0
Outcome
clusteringe0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“no strict clustering regarding root color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1005 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and root biosynthesis was independent for nine of 15 volatiles.

Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Outcome
biosynthesis in leaves and rootse0
Value
nine of the 15 volatilese0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“biosynthesis in leaves and roots is independent between these two organs for nine of the 15 volatiles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Myristicine contents in leaves and roots were significantly correlated.

Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Outcome
myristicine contente0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“a significant correlation of the myristicine content between leaves and roots was determined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1212 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest myristicine as a bitter marker for carrot breeding.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Compound
this compounde0
Outcome
bitter markere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggests the use of this compound as a bitter marker in carrot breeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1291 · show in text ↑