Paper · 2013 · Dose-Response

Hormesis and Paradoxical Effects of Wheat Seedling ( Triticum Aestivum L.) Parameters upon Exposure to Different Pollutants in a Wide Range of Doses

Elena A. Erofeeva

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
41
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Chlorophyll and carotenoid content (ChCar), lipid peroxidation (LP) and growth parameters (GP) in plants are often used for environmental pollution estimation. However, the nonmonotonic dose-response dependences (hormesis and paradoxical effects) of these indices are insufficiently explored following exposure to different pollutants. In this experiment, we studied nonmonotonic changes in ChCar, LP, GP in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) upon exposure to lead, cadmium, copper, manganese, formaldehyde, the herbicide glyphosate, and sodium chloride in a wide range from sublethal concentration to 10(2)-10(5) times lower concentrations. 85.7% of dose-response dependences were nonmonotonic (of these, 5.5% were hormesis and paradoxical effects comprised 94.5%). Multiphasic dependences were the most widespread type of paradoxical effect. Hormesis was a part of some multiphasic responses (i.e. paradoxical effects), which indicates a relationship between these phenomena. Sublethal pollutant concentrations significantly increased LP (to 2.0-2.4 times, except for manganese and glyphosate) and decreased GP (to 2.1-36.6 times, except for glyphosate), while ChCar was reduced insignificantly, normalized or even increased. Lower pollutant concentrations caused a moderate deviation in all parameters from the control (not more than 62%) for hormesis and paradoxical effects. The seedling parameters could have different types of nonmonotonic responses upon exposure to the same pollutant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

85.7% of dose-response relationships were nonmonotonic.

Outcome
dose-response dependencese0
Direction
nonmonotonice0
Value
85.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“85.7% of dose-response dependences were nonmonotonic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

5.5% of nonmonotonic responses were hormesis.

Outcome
hormesise0
Value
5.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“of these, 5.5% were hormesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

94.5% of nonmonotonic responses were paradoxical effects.

Outcome
paradoxical effectse0
Value
94.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“paradoxical effects comprised 94.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiphasic dependences were the most widespread paradoxical response.

Outcome
type of paradoxical effecte0
Direction
most widespreade0
Qualifier
Multiphasic dependencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Multiphasic dependences were the most widespread type of paradoxical effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hormesis appeared within some multiphasic responses.

Outcome
Hormesise0
Qualifier
some multiphasic responsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hormesis was a part of some multiphasic responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sublethal pollutants increased lipid peroxidation by 2.0–2.4 times, except manganese and glyphosate.

Treatment
Sublethal pollutant concentrationse0
Outcome
LPe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.0-2.4 timese0
Qualifier
except for manganese and glyphosatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sublethal pollutant concentrations significantly increased LP (to 2.0-2.4 times, except for manganese and glyphosate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sublethal pollutants reduced growth indices by 2.1–36.6 times, except glyphosate.

Treatment
Sublethal pollutant concentrationse1
Outcome
GPe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.1-36.6 timese0
Qualifier
except for glyphosatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased GP (to 2.1-36.6 times, except for glyphosate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sublethal pollutant concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixednot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll and carotenoids under sublethal pollutants were variously reduced insignificantly, normalized or increased.

Treatment
Sublethal pollutant concentrationse1
Outcome
ChCare0
Direction
reduced insignificantly, normalized or even increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while ChCar was reduced insignificantly, normalized or even increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sublethal pollutant concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower pollutant concentrations caused deviations no greater than 62% in all indices.

Treatment
Lower pollutant concentrationse0
Outcome
all parameterse0
Direction
moderate deviatione0
Value
not more than 62%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower pollutant concentrations caused a moderate deviation in all parameters from the control (not more than 62%) for hormesis and paradoxical effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–50 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same pollutant could produce different types of nonmonotonic seedling responses.

Outcome
seedling parameterse0
Qualifier
different types of nonmonotonic responsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seedling parameters could have different types of nonmonotonic responses upon exposure to the same pollutant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–50 · show in text ↑

pollution · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pollution · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 1 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.