Paper · 1985 · Soil Science & Plant Nutrition

Availability to Rice Plants of Nitrogen Fixed byAzolla

Osamu Ito; Iwao Watanabe

15
claims
18
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The decomposition processes of Azolla in water and soil in relation to the availability of Azolla-nitrogen to rice plants were determined using 15N as a tracer. Among the 3 species of Azolla (8 strains) used in this experiment, Azolla pinnata from Malaysia attained the highest biomass and supplied the largest amount of decaying materials to water. Azolla mexicana showed intermediate characteristics in growth and detachment of old tissues. Azolla filiculoides grew very slowly and developed symptoms of decay at early stages. The amount of ammonium excreted from Azolla into the water was negligible. When Azolla was incorporated into soil, A. pinnata underwent the most active mineralization process, followed by A. filiculoides and A. mexicana. Among the A. pinnata strains, the one from Malaysia released the largest amount of ammonium into soils. Within 6 weeks about two thirds of the nitrogen were lost from Azolla that was placed on the surface of flooded soils. Losses were about 30% from Azolla that was incorporated. Rice plants grown in a pot absorbed 50% 15N-labeled Azolla-nitrogen incorporated at the time of transplanting. When Azolla was kept on the surface of water, less than 10% of its nitrogen was available to the rice plant. In the field trial, larger amounts of Azolla-nitrogen were available to rice when Azolla was incorporated than when it was placed on the soil surface. However, the availability following incorporation (12-27%) was much lower than pots. A later application (78 days after transplanting) resulted in a higher contribution of Azolla-nitrogen to grain-nitrogen than an earlier application (30 or 53 days after transplanting).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla pinnata from Malaysia attained the highest biomass among the three Azolla species.

Taxon
Azolla pinnataAzolla pinnatae1
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azolla pinnata
Azolla pinnata · TaxonTpa2067 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Azolla pinnata from Malaysia attained the highest biomass and supplied the largest amount of decaying materials to water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla pinnata from Malaysia supplied the largest amount of decaying materials to water.

Taxon
Azolla pinnataAzolla pinnatae1
Outcome
amount of decaying materialse1
Direction
largeste1
Qualifier
to watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azolla pinnata
Azolla pinnata · TaxonTpa2067 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Azolla pinnata from Malaysia attained the highest biomass and supplied the largest amount of decaying materials to water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla mexicana showed intermediate characteristics in growth and in detachment of old tissues.

Taxon
Azolla mexicanaAzolla mexicanae1
Outcome
characteristics in growth and detachment of old tissuese1
Direction
intermediatee1

Verbatim

e1

“Azolla mexicana showed intermediate characteristics in growth and detachment of old tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–441 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla filiculoides grew very slowly.

Taxon
Azolla filiculoidesAzolla filiculoidese1
Outcome
grewe1
Direction
very slowlye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azolla filiculoides
Azolla filiculoides · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Azolla filiculoides grew very slowly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–479 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla filiculoides developed symptoms of decay at early stages.

Taxon
Azolla filiculoidesAzolla filiculoidese1
Outcome
symptoms of decaye1
Qualifier
at early stagese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azolla filiculoides
Azolla filiculoides · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Azolla filiculoides grew very slowly and developed symptoms of decay at early stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–527 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amount of ammonium excreted from Azolla into the water was negligible.

Taxon
AzollaAzollae1
Outcome
amount of ammonium excretede1
Direction
negligiblee1
Qualifier
into the watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azolla
Azolla · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryVis M · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The amount of ammonium excreted from Azolla into the water was negligible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When Azolla was incorporated into soil, A. pinnata had the most active mineralization process, ahead of A. filiculoides and A. mexicana.

Taxon
A. pinnataAzolla pinnatae1
Treatment
incorporated into soile1
Outcome
mineralization processe1
Direction
most activee1
Comparator
A. filiculoides and A. mexicanae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azolla pinnata
Azolla pinnata · TaxonTpa2067 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“When Azolla was incorporated into soil, A. pinnata underwent the most active mineralization process, followed by A. filiculoides and A. mexicana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–748 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the A. pinnata strains, the one from Malaysia released the largest amount of ammonium into soils.

Taxon
A. pinnataAzolla pinnatae1
Material
the one from Malaysiae1
Outcome
amount of ammoniume1
Direction
largeste1
Qualifier
into soilse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azolla pinnata
Azolla pinnata · TaxonTpa2067 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Among the A. pinnata strains, the one from Malaysia released the largest amount of ammonium into soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–852 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within 6 weeks about two thirds of the nitrogen were lost from Azolla placed on the surface of flooded soils.

Taxon
AzollaAzollae1
Treatment
placed on the surface of flooded soilse1
Outcome
nitrogene1
Direction
loste1
Value
about two thirdse1
Qualifier
Within 6 weekse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azolla
Azolla · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryVis M · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Within 6 weeks about two thirds of the nitrogen were lost from Azolla that was placed on the surface of flooded soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–971 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Losses of about 30% of nitrogen occurred from incorporated Azolla.

Taxon
AzollaAzollae1
Treatment
that was incorporatede1
Outcome
Lossese1
Value
about 30%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azolla
Azolla · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryVis M · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Losses were about 30% from Azolla that was incorporated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When Azolla was kept on the surface of water, less than 10% of its nitrogen was available to the rice plant.

Taxon
rice plantOryza sativae1
Treatment
kept on the surface of watere1
Outcome
nitrogen was availablee1
Value
less than 10%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“When Azolla was kept on the surface of water, less than 10% of its nitrogen was available to the rice plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1248 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice plants grown in a pot absorbed 50% of 15N-labeled Azolla-nitrogen incorporated at transplanting.

Taxon
Rice plantsOryza sativae1
Treatment
incorporated at the time of transplantinge1
Outcome
absorbede1
Value
50%e1
Setting
in a pote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rice plants grown in a pot absorbed 50% 15N-labeled Azolla-nitrogen incorporated at the time of transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field trial, larger amounts of Azolla-nitrogen were available to rice when Azolla was incorporated than when it was placed on the soil surface.

Treatment
incorporatede1
Outcome
Azolla-nitrogen were availablee1
Direction
larger amountse1
Comparator
placed on the soil surfacee1
Setting
field triale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the field trial, larger amounts of Azolla-nitrogen were available to rice when Azolla was incorporated than when it was placed on the soil surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field trial, availability of Azolla-nitrogen after incorporation (12-27%) was much lower than in pots.

Treatment
incorporatione1
Outcome
availabilitye1
Direction
much lowere1
Value
12-27%e1
Comparator
potse1
Setting
field triale3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“However, the availability following incorporation (12-27%) was much lower than pots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1484 · show in text ↑
e2

“larger amounts of Azolla-nitrogen were available to rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1326 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the field trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A later application at 78 days after transplanting gave a higher contribution of Azolla-nitrogen to grain-nitrogen than an earlier application at 30 or 53 days.

Organ / stage
graine1
Treatment
later application (78 days after transplanting)e1
Outcome
contribution of Azolla-nitrogen to grain-nitrogene1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
earlier application (30 or 53 days after transplanting)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A later application (78 days after transplanting) resulted in a higher contribution of Azolla-nitrogen to grain-nitrogen than an earlier application (30 or 53 days after transplanting)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1670 · show in text ↑
e2

“larger amounts of Azolla-nitrogen were available to rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1326 · show in text ↑

transplanting · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 32 positive, 3 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.