Paper · 1998 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Evaluation of layer litter rates as a fertilizer for greenhouse strawberry and lettuce

I. G. Rubeiz; M. Khansa; M. M. Freiwat

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Laying hen litter [3.4% nitrogen (N), 0.86% phosphorus (P), 15% water (H2O)] as a fertilizer was evaluated in greenhouse production of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch. cv. Oso Grande) and cos‐lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Amanthus). Litter was preplant soil incorporated at 7 (R1) and 14 (R2) ton ha‐1, and compared to ammonium nitrate (AN) (34–0–0) and an unfertilized (control) treatments. Rates of AN were at 150 kg N ha‐1 for strawberry, in eight split applications, and 100 kg N ha‐1 for lettuce, in two split applications. Preplant soil levels (mg kg‐1) of NO3‐N and P(H2O sol.) were 80 and 5.5, respectively (strawberry), and 91 and 6.8, respectively (lettuce). Strawberry yield was highest in R2 with all fertilized treatments yielding higher than the control. Leaf phosphorus (P) was comparable in all treatments, with R2 giving the highest P content. Lettuce yield was comparable in all treatments. Leaf NO3‐N was higher in all fertilized treatments than the control and leaf P was comparable among all treatments. The lower rate of litter is recommended as it is equally effective to AN and the higher litter rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry yield was highest at the higher litter rate.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
R2e0
Outcome
Strawberry yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all fertilized treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strawberry yield was highest in R2 with all fertilized treatments yielding higher than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fertilized treatments yielded more strawberry than the control.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
all fertilized treatmentse0
Outcome
Strawberry yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strawberry yield was highest in R2 with all fertilized treatments yielding higher than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry leaf phosphorus was comparable across treatments.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
Leaf phosphorus (P)e0
Direction
comparablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf phosphorus (P) was comparable in all treatments, with R2 giving the highest P content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher litter rate gave the highest strawberry leaf phosphorus.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
R2e0
Outcome
P contente0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf phosphorus (P) was comparable in all treatments, with R2 giving the highest P content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce yield was comparable across treatments.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
Lettuce yielde0
Direction
comparablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lettuce yield was comparable in all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized lettuce had higher leaf nitrate nitrogen than the control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
all fertilized treatmentse0
Outcome
Leaf NO3‐Ne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf NO3‐N was higher in all fertilized treatments than the control and leaf P was comparable among all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce leaf phosphorus was comparable among treatments.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf Pe0
Direction
comparablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf NO3‐N was higher in all fertilized treatments than the control and leaf P was comparable among all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the lower litter rate because it is as effective as ammonium nitrate and the higher litter rate.

Taxon
strawberry and lettuceFragaria ×ananassaLactuca sativat0
Outcome
The lower rate of litter is recommendede0
Comparator
AN and the higher litter ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower rate of litter is recommended as it is equally effective to AN and the higher litter rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry and lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–86 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

229 papers: 193 positive, 36 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

225 papers more in this group

See all 229 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.