Paper · 1999 · Nematology

Allelopathy: a possible mechanism of suppression of plant-parasitic nematodes by entomopathogenic nematodes

Parwinder S. Grewal; Edwin E. Lewis; Sudha Venkatachari

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
92
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A possible mechanism of suppression of a plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita by entomopathogenic nematodes is described. Heat-killed entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema feltiae and S. riobrave temporarily suppressed penetration of the root-knot nematode M. incognita into tomato roots, but live nematodes had no effect. Infective juvenile M. incognita were repelled from all entomopathogenic nematode treatments that included their symbiotic bacteria. They were repelled by Galleria mellonella cadavers infected with S. carpocapsae, S. feltiae, and S. riobrave and from cell-free culture filtrates of the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus nematophilus, X. bovienii, and Xenorhabdus sp. "R" from the three nematode species, respectively. Cell-free filtrates from all three Xenorhabdus spp. were toxic to M. incognita infective juveniles causing 98-100% mortality at 15% concentration. Cell-free filtrate of Xenorhabdus sp. "R" also reduced the hatch of M. incognita eggs. Application of formulated bacterial cell-free filtrates temporarily suppressed M. incognita penetration into tomato roots in a greenhouse trial. The short-term effects of cell-free bacterial filtrates, namely toxicity and repellency, were almost entirely due to ammonium. These results demonstrate allelopathic interactions between plant-parasitic nematodes, entomopathogenic nematodes and their symbiotic bacteria. The likely role of allelopathy in the suppression of plant-parasitic nematodes by innundative applications of entomopathogenic nematodes is discussed. Allelopathie: Ein moglicher Mechanismus zur Unterdruckung pflanzenparasitarer Nematoden durch insektenpathogene Nematoden - Es wird ein moglicher Mechanismus zur Unterdruckung des pflanzenparasitaren Nematoden Meloidogyne incognita durch insektenpathogene Nematoden beschrieben. Durch Hitze abgetotete insektenpathogene Nematoden Steinernema feltiae und S. riobrave underdruckten das Eindringen des Wurzelgallenalchens M. incognita in Tomatenwurzeln, lebende Nematoden hatten keine Wirkung. Infektionsjuvenile von M. incognita wurden von allen Behandlungen mit insektenpathogenen Nematoden abgestossen, die auch die symbiontischen Bakterien einschlossen. Sie wurden durch die Kadaver von Galleria mellonella abgestossen, die mit S. carpocapsae, S. feltiae und S. riobrave infiziert waren sowie durch zellfreie Kultursubstrate der symbiontischen Bakterien Xenorhabdus nematophilus, X. bovienii und Xenorhabdus sp. "R" aus den drei genannten Nematodenarten. Zellfreie Kultursubstrate von allen drei Xenorhabdus spp. waren giftig fur die Infektionsjuvenilen von M. incognita und verursachten in einer Konzentration von 15% Abtotungsraten von 98-100%. Zellfreie Kultursubstrate von Xenorhabdus sp. "R" vermiderten ausserdem das Schlupfen von M. incognita-Eiern. In einem Gewachshausversuch unterdruckten formulierte zellfreie Bakterienfiltrate vorubergehend das Eindringen von M. incognita in Tomatenwurzeln. Die Kurzzeitwirkungen von zellfreien Bakterien filtraten, namentlich Giftigkeit und Abstossung, waren nahezu ganz bedingt durch Ammoniak. Diese Ergebnisse zeigen das Vorhandensein von allelopathischen Wechselwirkungen zwischen pflanzenparasitaren Nematoden, insektenpathogenen Nematoden und deren symbiontischen Bakterien. Die wahrscheinliche Rolle von Allelopathie bei der Unterdruckung pflanzenparasitarer Nematoden durch eine Massenanwendung insektenpathogener Nematoden wird diskutiert.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat-killed Steinernema feltiae temporarily suppressed M. incognita penetration into tomato roots.

Treatment
Heat-killed entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema feltiaee0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Second interactor
Steinernema feltiaeSteinernema feltiaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
penetration of the root-knot nematode M. incognita into tomato rootse0
Direction
suppressede0
Comparator
live nematodese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Steinernema feltiae
Steinernema feltiae · Second interactorTony Coulson · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat-killed entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema feltiae and S. riobrave temporarily suppressed penetration of the root-knot nematode M. incognita into tomato roots, but live nematodes had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat-killed S. riobrave temporarily suppressed M. incognita penetration into tomato roots.

Treatment
S. riobravee0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Second interactor
S. riobraveSteinernema riobravee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
penetration of the root-knot nematode M. incognita into tomato rootse0
Direction
suppressede0
Comparator
live nematodese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat-killed entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema feltiae and S. riobrave temporarily suppressed penetration of the root-knot nematode M. incognita into tomato roots, but live nematodes had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Live entomopathogenic nematodes had no effect on M. incognita root penetration.

Treatment
live nematodese0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but live nematodes had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Symbiotic-bacteria-bearing nematode treatments repelled juvenile M. incognita.

Treatment
entomopathogenic nematode treatments that included their symbiotic bacteriae0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
Infective juvenile M. incognitae0
Direction
repellede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infective juvenile M. incognita were repelled from all entomopathogenic nematode treatments that included their symbiotic bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected Galleria cadavers repelled M. incognita juveniles.

Treatment
Galleria mellonella cadavers infected with S. carpocapsae, S. feltiae, and S. riobravee0
Outcome
Theye0
Direction
repellede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“They were repelled by Galleria mellonella cadavers infected with S. carpocapsae, S. feltiae, and S. riobrave”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xenorhabdus culture filtrates repelled M. incognita juveniles.

Treatment
cell-free culture filtrates of the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus nematophilus, X. bovienii, and Xenorhabdus sp. "R"e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“and from cell-free culture filtrates of the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus nematophilus, X. bovienii, and Xenorhabdus sp. "R" from the three nematode species, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xenorhabdus filtrates caused 98-100% mortality of M. incognita juveniles at 15% concentration.

Treatment
Cell-free filtrates from all three Xenorhabdus spp.e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
M. incognita infective juveniles causing 98-100% mortalitye0
Direction
toxice0
Value
98-100%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cell-free filtrates from all three Xenorhabdus spp. were toxic to M. incognita infective juveniles causing 98-100% mortality at 15% concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xenorhabdus sp. R filtrate reduced M. incognita egg hatch.

Treatment
Cell-free filtrate of Xenorhabdus sp. "R"e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
hatch of M. incognita eggse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cell-free filtrate of Xenorhabdus sp. "R" also reduced the hatch of M. incognita eggs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formulated bacterial filtrates temporarily suppressed M. incognita penetration of tomato roots in a greenhouse.

Treatment
Application of formulated bacterial cell-free filtratese0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
M. incognita penetration into tomato rootse0
Direction
suppressede0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of formulated bacterial cell-free filtrates temporarily suppressed M. incognita penetration into tomato roots in a greenhouse trial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1135 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute short-term filtrate toxicity and repellency almost entirely to ammonium.

Compound
ammoniume0
Outcome
toxicity and repellencye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The short-term effects of cell-free bacterial filtrates, namely toxicity and repellency, were almost entirely due to ammonium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1262 · show in text ↑

Steinernema riobrave · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Xenorhabdus · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Steinernema feltiae · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

heat · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biocontrol · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 44 positive, 26 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

pathogen product · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.