Paper · 1973 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Liming as Related to Solubility of P and Plant Growth in an Acid Tropical Soil

S. L. Amarasiri; S. R. Olsen

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
86
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The reactions between soil and fertilizer P at six levels of liming were investigated on an acid tropical soil. An acidic soil of pH 3.8 was limed to pH 7.0 in stages. Four levels of phosphorus were added to the soils. For any level of phosphorus, liming decreased soluble P and labile P until the pH reached about 6.5. The phosphate potentials did not lie consistently on known solubility isotherms, but the potentials approached hydroxyapatite at pH values between 6.9 and 7.0. A labile pool of P appeared to govern mainly the concentration of P in the soil solution. Limed soil had a higher maximum adsorption capacity for phosphorus than the unlimed soil. Adsorption of P by the freshly precipitated Fe and Al hydroxides apparently caused the greater inactivation of added phosphorus in the limed soils. Rye ( Secale cereale L.) and millet ( Setaria italica L.) were grown in the greenhouse at six levels of lime and four levels of phosphorus. The yields and percent P of rye were significantly increased by P without lime, but the response to added P was greater in the presence of lime. Lime with added P caused larger differences in yield and percent P of millet than in rye. Liming increased the yields of millet with added P until a pH of about 5 to 6 was reached, but further additions of lime decreased the yields. The percent P of millet increased with the initial applications of lime, but further additions resulted in a slight decrease of percent P. Plants were healthier and their root system better developed on the limed soil, which probably caused a higher percent P in the tops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus increased rye yield without lime, with greater response when lime was present.

Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
without limee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields and percent P of rye were significantly increased by P without lime, but the response to added P was greater in the presence of lime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus increased rye percent P without lime, with greater response under liming.

Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
percent Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
without limee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields and percent P of rye were significantly increased by P without lime, but the response to added P was greater in the presence of lime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime plus phosphorus produced larger millet yield differences than rye.

Taxon
millete0
Treatment
Lime with added Pe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
larger differencese0
Comparator
ryee0

Verbatim

e0

“Lime with added P caused larger differences in yield and percent P of millet than in rye.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime plus phosphorus produced larger millet percent P differences than rye.

Taxon
millete0
Treatment
Lime with added Pe0
Outcome
percent Pe0
Direction
larger differencese0
Comparator
ryee0

Verbatim

e0

“Lime with added P caused larger differences in yield and percent P of millet than in rye.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With added phosphorus, liming increased millet yield until pH about 5 to 6, then further lime decreased it.

Taxon
millete0
Treatment
Liminge0
Outcome
yields of millete0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
pH of about 5 to 6e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Liming increased the yields of millet with added P until a pH of about 5 to 6 was reached, but further additions of lime decreased the yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further lime beyond pH about 5 to 6 decreased millet yield.

Taxon
millete1
Treatment
further additions of limee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but further additions of lime decreased the yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lime with added P caused larger differences in yield and percent P of millet than in rye.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial lime applications increased millet percent P.

Taxon
millete0
Treatment
initial applications of limee0
Outcome
percent Pe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The percent P of millet increased with the initial applications of lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further lime slightly decreased millet percent P.

Taxon
millete1
Treatment
further additionse0
Outcome
percent Pe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but further additions resulted in a slight decrease of percent P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lime with added P caused larger differences in yield and percent P of millet than in rye.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants on limed soil were healthier and had better developed roots.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
limed soile0
Outcome
healthier and their root system better developede0
Direction
better developede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plants were healthier and their root system better developed on the limed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1552 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed higher shoot percent P to healthier, better developed roots on limed soil.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaee1
Outcome
higher percent P in the topse0
Qualifier
probablye0

Verbatim

e0

“which probably caused a higher percent P in the tops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants were healthier and their root system better developed on the limed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1552 · show in text ↑

lime · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.