Abstract
The experiments were conducted to develop insecticide (Imidachlorpid, Imitaf 20SL at 0.5 ml/l) application schedule for the effective management of thrips and pod borer attacking mungbean during kharif-I season of 2010 and 2011. In both the years, suppression of thrips population and pod borer infestation were higher in double sprayed treatment than single spraying. Single spraying at 35 DAS (100% flowering) and 42 DAS (100% podding stage) suppressed flower infestation by thrips upto 86 and 93%, respectively, during 2010 and 100 & 96%, respectively, during 2011. Double spraying at 42 DAS (100% podding) and 49 DAS (seed developing stage) reduced more pod borer infestation as much as 81-83%. In kharif-I 2010, significantly the highest yield (1798 kg/ha) and MBCR (4.67) were obtained from the plots sprayed twice with Imidachlorpid at 42 DAS (100% podding) and 49 DAS (seed developing stage) but in kharif-I 2011, significantly the highest yield (1457 kg/ha) and MBCR (5.75) were obtained from the plots sprayed twice with Imidachlorpid at 35 DAS (100% flowering) and 42 DAS (100% podding stage). The double spray schedule appeared to be more effective than single spraying against pod borer. But single spray at 42 DAS (100% podding stage) appeared as more effective against flower thrips. Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 38(1): 19-28, March 2013 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v38i1.15186
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Double spraying suppressed thrips more than single spraying.
- Taxon
- mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- double sprayed treatmente0
- Outcome
- suppression of thrips populatione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- single sprayinge0
ThripsOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“suppression of thrips population and pod borer infestation were higher in double sprayed treatment than single spraying”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Double spraying suppressed pod borer more than single spraying.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- double sprayed treatmente0
- Interactor
- pod borere0pest
- Outcome
- pod borer infestatione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- single sprayinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“suppression of thrips population and pod borer infestation were higher in double sprayed treatment than single spraying”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
A 35 DAS spray suppressed thrips flower infestation by up to 86% in 2010 and 100% in 2011.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Single spraying at 35 DAS (100% flowering)e0
- Outcome
- flower infestation by thripse0
- Direction
- suppressede0
- Value
- 86e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Single spraying at 35 DAS (100% flowering) and 42 DAS (100% podding stage) suppressed flower infestation by thrips upto 86 and 93%, respectively, during 2010 and 100 & 96%, respectively, during 2011”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
A 42 DAS spray suppressed thrips flower infestation by up to 93% in 2010 and 96% in 2011.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- 42 DAS (100% podding stage)e0
- Outcome
- flower infestation by thripse0
- Direction
- suppressede0
- Value
- 93%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Single spraying at 35 DAS (100% flowering) and 42 DAS (100% podding stage) suppressed flower infestation by thrips upto 86 and 93%, respectively, during 2010 and 100 & 96%, respectively, during 2011”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Double spraying at 42 and 49 DAS reduced pod borer infestation by 81–83%.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Double spraying at 42 DAS (100% podding) and 49 DAS (seed developing stage)e0
- Interactor
- pod borere0pest
- Outcome
- pod borer infestatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 81-83%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Double spraying at 42 DAS (100% podding) and 49 DAS (seed developing stage) reduced more pod borer infestation as much as 81-83%”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
The 42 and 49 DAS schedule gave the highest yield in 2010.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- sprayed twice with Imidachlorpid at 42 DAS (100% podding) and 49 DAS (seed developing stage)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1798 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly the highest yield (1798 kg/ha) and MBCR (4.67) were obtained from the plots sprayed twice with Imidachlorpid at 42 DAS (100% podding) and 49 DAS (seed developing stage)”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
The 42 and 49 DAS schedule gave the highest MBCR in 2010.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- sprayed twice with Imidachlorpid at 42 DAS (100% podding) and 49 DAS (seed developing stage)e0
- Outcome
- MBCRe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 4.67e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly the highest yield (1798 kg/ha) and MBCR (4.67) were obtained from the plots sprayed twice with Imidachlorpid at 42 DAS (100% podding) and 49 DAS (seed developing stage)”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
The 35 and 42 DAS schedule gave the highest yield in 2011.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- sprayed twice with Imidachlorpid at 35 DAS (100% flowering) and 42 DAS (100% podding stage)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1457 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly the highest yield (1457 kg/ha) and MBCR (5.75) were obtained from the plots sprayed twice with Imidachlorpid at 35 DAS (100% flowering) and 42 DAS (100% podding stage)”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
The 35 and 42 DAS schedule gave the highest MBCR in 2011.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- sprayed twice with Imidachlorpid at 35 DAS (100% flowering) and 42 DAS (100% podding stage)e0
- Outcome
- MBCRe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 5.75e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly the highest yield (1457 kg/ha) and MBCR (5.75) were obtained from the plots sprayed twice with Imidachlorpid at 35 DAS (100% flowering) and 42 DAS (100% podding stage)”
t0“Mungbean”
The same questions in other papers
application · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →stage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
212 papers more in this group
See all 216 papers →stage · Thrips · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · Thrips · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.