Abstract
Investigation on the management of thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood infesting green gram was carried out under field condition during 2017 at Pulse Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, India. For the management of thrips, different combinations of seed treatments viz., imidacloprid 30.5 SC @ 0.12%, clothianidin 50 WDG @ 0.20% and thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.01% and foliar application of insecticides profenophos 40% + cypermethrin 4% 44 EC @ 0.044%, spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135% and flonicamid 50 WG @ 0.015% were evaluated against the pest. Based on pooled over periods, seed treatment of thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.10% and insecticidal spray of spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135% was found most effective for the control of thrips.The highest (1066 kg /ha) seed yield was gained from the plots treated with thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.10% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135% followed by imidacloprid 30.5 SC @ 0.12% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135% (1025). Maximum yield loss can be avoided with spray application of thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.10% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135% (90.64%) followed by imidacloprid 30.5 SC @ 0.12% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135%(83.16%) as compared to control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam seed treatment plus spinosad spray was most effective against thrips.
- Taxon
- Green Gram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- seed treatment of thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.10% and insecticidal spray of spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135%e0
- Outcome
- control of thripse0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
ThripsNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“seed treatment of thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.10% and insecticidal spray of spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135% was found most effective for the control of thrips”
t0“Green Gram”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam plus spinosad produced the highest seed yield, 1066 kg /ha.
- Taxon
- Green GramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.10% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135%e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1066 kg /hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest (1066 kg /ha) seed yield was gained from the plots treated with thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.10% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135%”
t0“Green Gram”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid plus spinosad produced seed yield of 1025.
- Taxon
- Green GramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- imidacloprid 30.5 SC @ 0.12% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135%e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 1025e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by imidacloprid 30.5 SC @ 0.12% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135% (1025)”
t0“Green Gram”
e1“seed yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam plus spinosad avoided 90.64% yield loss versus control.
- Taxon
- Green GramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.10% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135%e0
- Outcome
- yield losse0
- Direction
- avoidede0
- Value
- 90.64%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum yield loss can be avoided with spray application of thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.10% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135% (90.64%) followed by imidacloprid 30.5 SC @ 0.12% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135%(83.16%) as compared to control”
t0“Green Gram”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid plus spinosad avoided 83.16% yield loss versus control.
- Taxon
- Green GramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- imidacloprid 30.5 SC @ 0.12% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135%e0
- Outcome
- yield losse1
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 83.16%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by imidacloprid 30.5 SC @ 0.12% + spinosad 45 SC @ 0.0135%(83.16%) as compared to control”
t0“Green Gram”
e1“yield loss”
The same questions in other papers
spinosad · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →spinosad · Thrips · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
thiamethoxam · Thrips · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
thiamethoxam · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →imidacloprid · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →seed treatment · Thrips · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →application · Thrips · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.