Paper · 2016 · Journal of Food Legumes

Efficacy of some new insecticides against pod borer in mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)

NK Yadav; PS Singh

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies were conducted at agricultural research farm, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi to know the efficacy of nine new insecticides against pod borers in mung bean. The lowest pod damage per cent was found in spinosad (2.33%) followed by indoxacarb (2.67%), Bt (3.33%), thiodicarb and profenophos (3.67%). The highest pod damage was recorded in acetamiprid (6.33%) followed by lamda-cyhalothrin (5.67%) and azadirachtin (5.0%). The maximum seed damage was recorded in acetamiprid (3.0%) while lowest in spinosad (1.33%). The maximum yield was recorded in indoxacarb (12.04 q/ha) while lowest yield was recorded in azadirachtin (9.44 q/ha). The highest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in acetamiprid (1: 7.91) followed by lamda cyhalothrin (1: 7.56). The lowest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in spinosad (1: 2.12) followed by Bt(1: 3.81) and indoxacarb (1: 4.57).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad produced 2.33% pod damage.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
spinosade0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest pod damage per cent was found in spinosad (2.33%) followed by indoxacarb (2.67%), Bt (3.33%), thiodicarb and profenophos (3.67%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

indoxacarb produced 2.67% pod damage.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
indoxacarbe0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest pod damage per cent was found in spinosad (2.33%) followed by indoxacarb (2.67%), Bt (3.33%), thiodicarb and profenophos (3.67%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt produced 3.33% pod damage.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Bte0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest pod damage per cent was found in spinosad (2.33%) followed by indoxacarb (2.67%), Bt (3.33%), thiodicarb and profenophos (3.67%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

thiodicarb produced 3.67% pod damage.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
thiodicarbe0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest pod damage per cent was found in spinosad (2.33%) followed by indoxacarb (2.67%), Bt (3.33%), thiodicarb and profenophos (3.67%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

profenophos produced 3.67% pod damage.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
profenophose0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest pod damage per cent was found in spinosad (2.33%) followed by indoxacarb (2.67%), Bt (3.33%), thiodicarb and profenophos (3.67%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

acetamiprid produced 6.33% pod damage.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
acetamipride0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest pod damage was recorded in acetamiprid (6.33%) followed by lamda-cyhalothrin (5.67%) and azadirachtin (5.0%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

lamda-cyhalothrin produced 5.67% pod damage.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
lamda-cyhalothrine0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest pod damage was recorded in acetamiprid (6.33%) followed by lamda-cyhalothrin (5.67%) and azadirachtin (5.0%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

azadirachtin produced 5.0% pod damage.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
azadirachtine0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest pod damage was recorded in acetamiprid (6.33%) followed by lamda-cyhalothrin (5.67%) and azadirachtin (5.0%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

acetamiprid produced 3.0% seed damage.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
acetamipride0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
seed damagee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum seed damage was recorded in acetamiprid (3.0%) while lowest in spinosad (1.33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad produced 1.33% seed damage.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
spinosade0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
seed damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum seed damage was recorded in acetamiprid (3.0%) while lowest in spinosad (1.33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

indoxacarb produced 12.04 q/ha yield.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
indoxacarbe0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
12.04 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum yield was recorded in indoxacarb (12.04 q/ha) while lowest yield was recorded in azadirachtin (9.44 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

azadirachtin produced 9.44 q/ha yield.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
azadirachtine0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
9.44 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum yield was recorded in indoxacarb (12.04 q/ha) while lowest yield was recorded in azadirachtin (9.44 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

acetamiprid produced 1: 7.91 cost: benefit ratio.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
acetamipride0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
cost: benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1: 7.91e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in acetamiprid (1: 7.91) followed by lamda cyhalothrin (1: 7.56).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

lamda cyhalothrin produced 1: 7.56 cost: benefit ratio.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
lamda cyhalothrine0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
cost: benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1: 7.56e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in acetamiprid (1: 7.91) followed by lamda cyhalothrin (1: 7.56).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spinosad produced 1: 2.12 cost: benefit ratio.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
spinosade0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
cost: benefit ratioe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1: 2.12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in spinosad (1: 2.12) followed by Bt(1: 3.81) and indoxacarb (1: 4.57).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt produced 1: 3.81 cost: benefit ratio.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Bte0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
cost: benefit ratioe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1: 3.81e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in spinosad (1: 2.12) followed by Bt(1: 3.81) and indoxacarb (1: 4.57).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

indoxacarb produced 1: 4.57 cost: benefit ratio.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
indoxacarbe0
Interactor
pod borert0pest
Outcome
cost: benefit ratioe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1: 4.57e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pod borer in mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lowest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in spinosad (1: 2.12) followed by Bt(1: 3.81) and indoxacarb (1: 4.57).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–869 · show in text ↑

spinosad · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

indoxacarb · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

indoxacarb · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

spinosad · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Sticky traps with azadirachtin and spinosad produced the largest pod borer infestation reduction.

    Evaluation of some integrated management approaches against flower thrips and pod borers of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) · 2018 · compared with installing white sticky trap + spraying chlorfenapyr (Intrepid 10 SC) + spraying with emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 5 SG)

    Same direction

  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

transgenic · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

transgenic · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.