Abstract
Studies were conducted at agricultural research farm, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi to know the efficacy of nine new insecticides against pod borers in mung bean. The lowest pod damage per cent was found in spinosad (2.33%) followed by indoxacarb (2.67%), Bt (3.33%), thiodicarb and profenophos (3.67%). The highest pod damage was recorded in acetamiprid (6.33%) followed by lamda-cyhalothrin (5.67%) and azadirachtin (5.0%). The maximum seed damage was recorded in acetamiprid (3.0%) while lowest in spinosad (1.33%). The maximum yield was recorded in indoxacarb (12.04 q/ha) while lowest yield was recorded in azadirachtin (9.44 q/ha). The highest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in acetamiprid (1: 7.91) followed by lamda cyhalothrin (1: 7.56). The lowest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in spinosad (1: 2.12) followed by Bt(1: 3.81) and indoxacarb (1: 4.57).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
spinosad produced 2.33% pod damage.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- spinosade0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- pod damagee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 2.33%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The lowest pod damage per cent was found in spinosad (2.33%) followed by indoxacarb (2.67%), Bt (3.33%), thiodicarb and profenophos (3.67%).”
Claim · model-written summary
indoxacarb produced 2.67% pod damage.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- indoxacarbe0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- pod damagee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 2.67%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The lowest pod damage per cent was found in spinosad (2.33%) followed by indoxacarb (2.67%), Bt (3.33%), thiodicarb and profenophos (3.67%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Bt produced 3.33% pod damage.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- Bte0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- pod damagee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 3.33%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The lowest pod damage per cent was found in spinosad (2.33%) followed by indoxacarb (2.67%), Bt (3.33%), thiodicarb and profenophos (3.67%).”
Claim · model-written summary
thiodicarb produced 3.67% pod damage.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- thiodicarbe0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- pod damagee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 3.67%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The lowest pod damage per cent was found in spinosad (2.33%) followed by indoxacarb (2.67%), Bt (3.33%), thiodicarb and profenophos (3.67%).”
Claim · model-written summary
profenophos produced 3.67% pod damage.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- profenophose0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- pod damagee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 3.67%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The lowest pod damage per cent was found in spinosad (2.33%) followed by indoxacarb (2.67%), Bt (3.33%), thiodicarb and profenophos (3.67%).”
Claim · model-written summary
acetamiprid produced 6.33% pod damage.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- acetamipride0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- pod damagee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 6.33%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The highest pod damage was recorded in acetamiprid (6.33%) followed by lamda-cyhalothrin (5.67%) and azadirachtin (5.0%).”
Claim · model-written summary
lamda-cyhalothrin produced 5.67% pod damage.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- lamda-cyhalothrine0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- pod damagee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 5.67%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The highest pod damage was recorded in acetamiprid (6.33%) followed by lamda-cyhalothrin (5.67%) and azadirachtin (5.0%).”
Claim · model-written summary
azadirachtin produced 5.0% pod damage.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- azadirachtine0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- pod damagee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 5.0%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The highest pod damage was recorded in acetamiprid (6.33%) followed by lamda-cyhalothrin (5.67%) and azadirachtin (5.0%).”
Claim · model-written summary
acetamiprid produced 3.0% seed damage.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- acetamipride0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- seed damagee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 3.0%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The maximum seed damage was recorded in acetamiprid (3.0%) while lowest in spinosad (1.33%).”
Claim · model-written summary
spinosad produced 1.33% seed damage.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- spinosade0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- seed damagee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 1.33%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The maximum seed damage was recorded in acetamiprid (3.0%) while lowest in spinosad (1.33%).”
Claim · model-written summary
indoxacarb produced 12.04 q/ha yield.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- indoxacarbe0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 12.04 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The maximum yield was recorded in indoxacarb (12.04 q/ha) while lowest yield was recorded in azadirachtin (9.44 q/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
azadirachtin produced 9.44 q/ha yield.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- azadirachtine0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 9.44 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The maximum yield was recorded in indoxacarb (12.04 q/ha) while lowest yield was recorded in azadirachtin (9.44 q/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
acetamiprid produced 1: 7.91 cost: benefit ratio.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- acetamipride0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- cost: benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1: 7.91e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The highest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in acetamiprid (1: 7.91) followed by lamda cyhalothrin (1: 7.56).”
Claim · model-written summary
lamda cyhalothrin produced 1: 7.56 cost: benefit ratio.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- lamda cyhalothrine0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- cost: benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1: 7.56e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The highest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in acetamiprid (1: 7.91) followed by lamda cyhalothrin (1: 7.56).”
Claim · model-written summary
spinosad produced 1: 2.12 cost: benefit ratio.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- spinosade0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- cost: benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 1: 2.12e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The lowest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in spinosad (1: 2.12) followed by Bt(1: 3.81) and indoxacarb (1: 4.57).”
Claim · model-written summary
Bt produced 1: 3.81 cost: benefit ratio.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- Bte0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- cost: benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 1: 3.81e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The lowest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in spinosad (1: 2.12) followed by Bt(1: 3.81) and indoxacarb (1: 4.57).”
Claim · model-written summary
indoxacarb produced 1: 4.57 cost: benefit ratio.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- indoxacarbe0
- Interactor
- pod borert0pest
- Outcome
- cost: benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 1: 4.57e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“pod borer in mung bean”
e0“The lowest cost: benefit ratio was obtained in spinosad (1: 2.12) followed by Bt(1: 3.81) and indoxacarb (1: 4.57).”
The same questions in other papers
spinosad · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →indoxacarb · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
indoxacarb · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →spinosad · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →transgenic · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
transgenic · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.