Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sticky traps with azadirachtin and spinosad produced the largest pod borer infestation reduction.

A claim from Evaluation of some integrated management approaches against flower thrips and pod borers of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sticky traps with azadirachtin and spinosad produced the largest pod borer infestation reduction.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
installing white sticky trap + spraying azadirachtin (Bio-neem plus 1EC) + spraying with spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)e0
Interactor
pod borere0pest
Outcome
pod borer infestation reductione0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
installing white sticky trap + spraying chlorfenapyr (Intrepid 10 SC) + spraying with emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 5 SG)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest pod borer infestation reduction was found in installing white sticky trap + spraying azadirachtin (Bio-neem plus 1EC) + spraying with spinosad (Success 2.5 SC) treated plots followed by installing white sticky trap + spraying chlorfenapyr (Intrepid 10 SC) + spraying with emamectin benzoate (Proclaim 5 SG).”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 699–1018
t0

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–119

Title

Evaluation of some integrated management approaches against flower thrips and pod borers of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)

Md Altaf Hossain; MA Sarker; MG Azam Jahangirnagar University Journal of Biological Sciences 2018. doi:10.3329/jujbs.v7i1.37974

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-7225d7b0d0b60c19648cd7b7cd82c887a076c848b0ffa2908694a597ba8f9bfb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

azadirachtin · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

spinosad · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

application · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.