Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Influence of Foliar Application of Water Soluble Fertilizers on Nodule Count and Rhizosphere Microbial Population in Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)

M. Bhavya; C. J. Sridhara; M. S. Nandish; et al.

4
claims
17
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during late Kharif 2018 on sandy loam soils at College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka, to study the effect of foliar application of water soluble fertilizers on nodule count and microbial population in green gram (Vigna radiata L.). The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design comprising of 3 replications and 13 treatment combinations consisting of three water soluble fertilizers along with package of practice (viz., 2 % DAP, 1 % 19:19:19, 2 % 19:19:19, 1 % monopotassium phosphate, 2 % monopotassium phosphate, 1% 19:19:19 +1 % monopotassium phosphate). All water soluble fertilizers were given as foliar spray at two crop growth stages (30 and 45 DAS). Results showed that foliar application of monopotassium phosphate and 19:19:19 each @ 1 per cent at 30 and 45 DAS along with package of practice recorded significantly higher number of nodules (36.92) at 45 DAS and the same treatment recorded significantly higher bacterial population (49.24 cfu g-1 of soil and 46.12 cfu g-1 of soil at 10-5 and 10-6 dilution, respectively), fungi population (17.13 cfu g-1 of soil and 14.97 cfu g-1 of soil at 10-3 and 10-4 dilution, respectively) and actinomycetes population (10.97 cfu g-1 of soil and 8.93 cfu g-1 of soil at 10-2 and 10-3 dilution, respectively) as compared to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined foliar fertilizer treatment produced significantly more nodules than other treatments at 45 DAS.

Organ / stage
45 DASe0
Treatment
foliar application of monopotassium phosphate and 19:19:19 each @ 1 per cent at 30 and 45 DAS along with package of practicee0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
highere0
Value
36.92e0
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of monopotassium phosphate and 19:19:19 each @ 1 per cent at 30 and 45 DAS along with package of practice recorded significantly higher number of nodules (36.92) at 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined foliar fertilizer treatment yielded a significantly higher bacterial population at both dilutions than other treatments.

Treatment
foliar application of monopotassium phosphate and 19:19:19 each @ 1 per cent at 30 and 45 DAS along with package of practicee2
Outcome
bacterial populatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
49.24 cfu g-1 of soil and 46.12 cfu g-1 of soile0
Qualifier
10-5 and 10-6 dilutione0
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the same treatment recorded significantly higher bacterial population (49.24 cfu g-1 of soil and 46.12 cfu g-1 of soil at 10-5 and 10-6 dilution, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1149 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1407 · show in text ↑
e2

“foliar application of monopotassium phosphate and 19:19:19 each @ 1 per cent at 30 and 45 DAS along with package of practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined foliar fertilizer treatment yielded a significantly higher fungi population at both dilutions than other treatments.

Treatment
foliar application of monopotassium phosphate and 19:19:19 each @ 1 per cent at 30 and 45 DAS along with package of practicee3
Outcome
fungi populatione0
Direction
highere1
Value
17.13 cfu g-1 of soil and 14.97 cfu g-1 of soile0
Qualifier
10-3 and 10-4 dilutione0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungi population (17.13 cfu g-1 of soil and 14.97 cfu g-1 of soil at 10-3 and 10-4 dilution, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1257 · show in text ↑
e1

“the same treatment recorded significantly higher bacterial population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1059 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1407 · show in text ↑
e3

“foliar application of monopotassium phosphate and 19:19:19 each @ 1 per cent at 30 and 45 DAS along with package of practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined foliar fertilizer treatment yielded a significantly higher actinomycetes population at both dilutions than other treatments.

Treatment
foliar application of monopotassium phosphate and 19:19:19 each @ 1 per cent at 30 and 45 DAS along with package of practicee3
Outcome
actinomycetes populatione0
Direction
highere1
Value
10.97 cfu g-1 of soil and 8.93 cfu g-1 of soile0
Qualifier
10-2 and 10-3 dilutione0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“actinomycetes population (10.97 cfu g-1 of soil and 8.93 cfu g-1 of soil at 10-2 and 10-3 dilution, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1375 · show in text ↑
e1

“the same treatment recorded significantly higher bacterial population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1059 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1407 · show in text ↑
e3

“foliar application of monopotassium phosphate and 19:19:19 each @ 1 per cent at 30 and 45 DAS along with package of practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑

application · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

application · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

storage · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · soil: biology · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

storage · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.