application · Pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)

Positive and negative results23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect197019801990200020102020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 22

  1. Effects of seed treatment and soil application with some insecticides on stemfly and pod borers on mungbean · 1970

  2. RELATIVE TOXICITY OF DIFFERENT INSECTICIDES AGAINST WHITEFLY, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) AND BLACK THRIPS, Caliothrips indicus ON NM-92 MUNG BEAN, Vigna radiata (L.) · 2002

    cited by 1 paper here

  3. Effect of foliar application of various insecticides on the infestation and population dynamics of stem fly in mung bean, Vigna radiata. · 2002

  4. Development Of Insecticide Application Schedule For Management Of Flower Thrips And Pod Borer In Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) · 2013

  5. COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF SOME INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUCKING INSECT PESTS ON MUNGBEAN, VIGNA RADIATA (L.) WILCZEK · 2013

    cites 1 paper here

  6. Pest spectra, succession and its yield losses in mungbean and urdbean underchanging climatic scenario · 2014

  7. Bio-efficacy of novel insecticides against whitefly, Bemesia tabaci in Mung bean · 2015

  8. Assessment of different insecticides on whitefly population and consequent viral diseases incidence · 2015

  9. Evaluation of newer insecticides againstsucking pestS of mungbea · 2016

  10. Relative efficacy and economics of seed treatment and newer insecticides against sucking and borer pests of summer mungbean in coastal Odisha · 2018

  11. Evaluation of some integrated management approaches against flower thrips and pod borers of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) · 2018

  12. Comparative Assessment of Biocontrol Agents (BGAs) and Chemical Insecticides on the Incidence and Management of Major Insect-Pests in Green Gram (Vigna mungo L.) in West Bengal · 2019

  13. Integrated Management of Yellow Mosaic Disease (YMD) of Mungbean · 2019

  14. Combination of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Biopesticides: An Effective Means of Suppressing Pod Borer Complex in Mungbean · 2019

  15. Influence of Foliar Application of Water Soluble Fertilizers on Nodule Count and Rhizosphere Microbial Population in Green gram (Vigna radiata L.) · 2020

  16. Field Efficacy of a Combination of Seed Treatment and Foliar Spray against Pest Complex in Green Gram · 2021

  17. Halo Tolerance of Biocontrol Agents against Root Rot of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek var. radiata) Caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid in Salt Affected Soils · 2021

  18. Effect of Pre-harvest Sprays of Insecticides/Botanicals for Control of Pulse Beetle Infestation and Seed Weight Loss in Mung Bean during Storage · 2023

  19. Efficacy of Certain Novel Insecticides against Insect Pests of Summer Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] · 2023

  20. Efficacy of bio-rational insecticide for eco-friendly management of pod borer of mung bean · 2024

  21. INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR MANAGEMENT OF PULSE BEETLE (CALLOSOBRUCHUS SP.) IN GREEN GRAM · 2025

  22. Assessing the effect of various nutrient management practices on Mungbean (Vigna radiata) production in Guava (Psidium guajava) based agri-horti system · 2025

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Best time of spraying irradiated carrageenan on the growth, yield and root nodulation of Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] · 2023

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application on Vigna radiata (mung bean) against other targets

application · pest on other organisms