application · Pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)
32 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 22
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Bio-efficacy of novel insecticides against whitefly, Bemesia tabaci in Mung bean · 2015
- positive
Assessment of different insecticides on whitefly population and consequent viral diseases incidence · 2015
- positive
Evaluation of newer insecticides againstsucking pestS of mungbea · 2016
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Integrated Management of Yellow Mosaic Disease (YMD) of Mungbean · 2019
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Efficacy of bio-rational insecticide for eco-friendly management of pod borer of mung bean · 2024
- positive
INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR MANAGEMENT OF PULSE BEETLE (CALLOSOBRUCHUS SP.) IN GREEN GRAM · 2025
- positive
- positive
- negative
- negative
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.