Paper · 2023 · Pesticide Research Journal

Efficacy of Certain Novel Insecticides against Insect Pests of Summer Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]

A Banerjee; Sabyasachi Ray

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The experiment was carried out to find out the most effective toxicant against the major pests of summer green gram. The three years study revealed that all the treatments reduced the pest population significantly and found to be harmless to the natural enemies as well. Among the treatments, seed treatment with imidacloprid 600 FS @ 5 g ai kg-1 seed followed by spraying with chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 20.0 g ai ha-1 was the most effective treatment against spotted pod borer (Maruca vitrata) whereas, seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by spraying with diafenthiuron 50 WP @ 312.5 g ai ha-1 was the best option to manage flower thrips. Maximum seed yield as well as highest benefit cost ratio was also achieved by seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by spraying with chlorantraniliprole.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The insecticide treatments reduced the pest population in summer green gram significantly.

Taxon
summer green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
all the treatmentse1
Outcome
pest populatione1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was carried out to find out the most effective toxicant against the major pests of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“The three years study revealed that all the treatments reduced the pest population significantly and found to be harmless to the natural enemies as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The insecticide treatments were harmless to natural enemies in summer green gram.

Taxon
summer green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
all the treatmentse1
Outcome
natural enemiese1
Direction
harmlesse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was carried out to find out the most effective toxicant against the major pests of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“The three years study revealed that all the treatments reduced the pest population significantly and found to be harmless to the natural enemies as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by chlorantraniliprole spraying was the most effective treatment against Maruca vitrata in summer green gram.

Taxon
summer green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid 600 FS @ 5 g ai kg-1 seed followed by spraying with chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 20.0 g ai ha-1e2
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae2pest
Outcome
the most effective treatment against spotted pod borer (Maruca vitrata)e2
Direction
most effectivee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was carried out to find out the most effective toxicant against the major pests of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the treatments, seed treatment with imidacloprid 600 FS @ 5 g ai kg-1 seed followed by spraying with chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC @ 20.0 g ai ha-1 was the most effective treatment against spotted pod borer (Maruca vitrata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by diafenthiuron spraying was the best option to manage flower thrips in summer green gram.

Taxon
summer green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by spraying with diafenthiuron 50 WP @ 312.5 g ai ha-1e3
Interactor
flower thripse3pest
Outcome
the best option to manage flower thripse3
Direction
best optione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was carried out to find out the most effective toxicant against the major pests of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“whereas, seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by spraying with diafenthiuron 50 WP @ 312.5 g ai ha-1 was the best option to manage flower thrips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by chlorantraniliprole spraying gave the maximum seed yield of summer green gram.

Taxon
summer green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by spraying with chlorantraniliprolee4
Outcome
seed yielde4
Direction
Maximume4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was carried out to find out the most effective toxicant against the major pests of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e4

“Maximum seed yield as well as highest benefit cost ratio was also achieved by seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by spraying with chlorantraniliprole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by chlorantraniliprole spraying gave the highest benefit cost ratio in summer green gram.

Taxon
summer green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by spraying with chlorantraniliprolee4
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was carried out to find out the most effective toxicant against the major pests of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e4

“Maximum seed yield as well as highest benefit cost ratio was also achieved by seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by spraying with chlorantraniliprole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–806 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · Maruca vitrata · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

diafenthiuron · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · Maruca vitrata · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

imidacloprid · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

seed treatment · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.