Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by diafenthiuron spraying was the best option to manage flower thrips in summer green gram.

A claim from Efficacy of Certain Novel Insecticides against Insect Pests of Summer Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by diafenthiuron spraying was the best option to manage flower thrips in summer green gram.

Taxon
summer green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by spraying with diafenthiuron 50 WP @ 312.5 g ai ha-1e3
Interactor
flower thripse3pest
Outcome
the best option to manage flower thripse3
Direction
best optione3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment was carried out to find out the most effective toxicant against the major pests of summer green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115
e3

“whereas, seed treatment with imidacloprid followed by spraying with diafenthiuron 50 WP @ 312.5 g ai ha-1 was the best option to manage flower thrips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–648

Title

Efficacy of Certain Novel Insecticides against Insect Pests of Summer Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]

A Banerjee; Sabyasachi Ray Pesticide Research Journal 2023. doi:10.5958/2249-524x.2023.00017.1

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-22e73a2aa3cf0a2f39271008728c97312a11228f069dcecb27097fc32377e3fb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

diafenthiuron · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

seed treatment · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.