Pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)

1. emamectin benzoatePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. triazophosPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Syzygium aromaticumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. Zea maysPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. imidaclopridResults agree17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. spinosadResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Azadirachta indicaResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. azadirachtinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. diafenthiuronResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. indoxacarbResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. Allium sativumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. PseudomonasResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. Sesamum indicumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. arsenic atomResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
15. deltamethrinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. monocrotophosResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. pendimethalinResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
18. spiromesifenResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. thiamethoxamResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. zinc sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. Acorus calamusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. Bacillus subtilisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. Bacillus thuringiensisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. Ocimum tenuiflorumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. RhizobiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. acetamipridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. beta-cyfluthrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. boric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. carbofuranResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. chlorantraniliproleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. detergentResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
32. dimethoateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. flubendiamideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. profenofosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. tracerResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. botanicalPositive and negative results33 papers: 26 positive, 7 negative or no effect
38. applicationPositive and negative results23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect
39. seed treatmentPositive and negative results15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect
40. fertilizationPositive and negative results10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect
41. insecticidePositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
42. inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
43. sowing timePositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
44. radiationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
45. irrigationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
46. uvPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
47. storageResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
48. trap barrierResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
49. transgenicResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
50. infectionResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.