Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Halo Tolerance of Biocontrol Agents against Root Rot of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek var. radiata) Caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid in Salt Affected Soils

P. T. Sharavanan; V. K. Satya; M. Rajesh

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Root rot of mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek var. radiata] is major disease and claims huge yield loss if they occur in the field. The pathogen is basically soil borne and survivability may vary depends on soil condition. The fungicide chemicals are available to manage the disease; however, the biocontrol agents are nowadays available for the disease management and the microbial activity of the biocontrol agents is influenced by existing soil condition including soil pH. Hence, a study was conducted to find out the halo tolerance capacity of the biocontrol agents against root rot disease in salt affected soils under in vitro, in vivo and field condition. The root rot pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina was isolated from infected root. Efficacy of biocontrol agents against growth of M. phaseolina was assessed in vitro. The results revealed that TNAU strain of Bacillus subtilis reduced the mycelial growth of the M. phaseolina significantly when media supplemented with NaCl at 5% (1.4 cm), 7.5% (1.5 cm), 10% (1.6cm) and 12.5% (1.6 cm) and without NaCl (1.2 cm) and similar trend of reduction also expressed by BCA1 strain of B. subtilis, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma viride under in vitro. The performance of the biocontrol agents against the pathogen is slightly reduced when media supplemented with NaCl. The reduction of mycelia weight of M.phaeolina was more in media added with TNAU strain of B.subtilis and the performance of TNAU strain of B.subtilis on reduction of mycelial weight of M.phaseolina is reduced when the broth added with NaCl at 5% (3.15g), 7.5% (3.25g), 10% (3.32g) and 12.5%(3.65g) level and which is followed by P. fluorescens, BCA 1 strain of B. subtilis and Trichoderma viride. Under pot culture conditions, the effect of talc formulated biocontrol agents and challenge inoculation with pathogen was assessed against root rot incidence. It was found that the soil application of TNAU strain of B.subtilis performed better in reducing the root rot incidence at pH of 7.0 (2.37%), 7.5 (4.50%), 8.0 (5.53%) and 8.7 (6.57%) and followed by BCA 1 of B.subtilis in all pH level. Among the biocontrol agents, TNAU strain of B.subtilis applied as seed as well as soil application expressed more population in the rhizosphere in all pH level. The biocontrol agents applied as soil application had more populations of the agents in the soil when compared to seed treatment. The halo tolerance performance of the biocontrol agents was also assessed under field condition in pH of 7.5 and 8.7 during 2019-20 and 2020-21. It was found that the minimum root rot incidence and maximum yield was observed from soil application of TNAU strain of B subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha but the effect is on par with soil application of BCA1 strain of B.subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TNAU Bacillus subtilis significantly reduced Macrophomina phaseolina mycelial growth across NaCl levels.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
TNAU strain of Bacillus subtilise0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growth of the M. phaseolinae0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
without NaCle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that TNAU strain of Bacillus subtilis reduced the mycelial growth of the M. phaseolina significantly when media supplemented with NaCl at 5% (1.4 cm), 7.5% (1.5 cm), 10% (1.6cm) and 12.5% (1.6 cm) and without NaCl (1.2 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl slightly reduced biocontrol agent performance against the pathogen.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
NaCle0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Outcome
performance of the biocontrol agents against the pathogene0
Direction
slightly reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of the biocontrol agents against the pathogen is slightly reduced when media supplemented with NaCl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TNAU Bacillus subtilis most reduced M. phaeolina mycelial weight, with poorer performance under NaCl.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
TNAU strain of B.subtilise0
Interactor
M.phaeolinae0pathogen
Second interactor
B.subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelia weight of M.phaeolinae0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of mycelia weight of M.phaeolina was more in media added with TNAU strain of B.subtilis and the performance of TNAU strain of B.subtilis on reduction of mycelial weight of M.phaseolina is reduced when the broth added with NaCl at 5% (3.15g), 7.5% (3.25g), 10% (3.32g) and 12.5%(3.65g) level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of TNAU B. subtilis gave the lowest pot root rot incidence across four pH levels.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
soil application of TNAU strain of B.subtilise0
Interactor
B.subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root rot incidencee0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
BCA 1 of B.subtilise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil application of TNAU strain of B.subtilis performed better in reducing the root rot incidence at pH of 7.0 (2.37%), 7.5 (4.50%), 8.0 (5.53%) and 8.7 (6.57%) and followed by BCA 1 of B.subtilis in all pH level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1908–2124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed and soil application of TNAU B. subtilis produced greater rhizosphere populations at all pH levels.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
TNAU strain of B.subtilis applied as seed as well as soil applicatione0
Interactor
B.subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population in the rhizospheree0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TNAU strain of B.subtilis applied as seed as well as soil application expressed more population in the rhizosphere in all pH level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2155–2286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application yielded more biocontrol agent populations than seed treatment.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
soil applicatione0
Interactor
biocontrol agentse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
populations of the agents in the soile0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
seed treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biocontrol agents applied as soil application had more populations of the agents in the soil when compared to seed treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2287–2416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field soil application of TNAU B. subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha gave minimum root rot incidence.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
soil application of TNAU strain of B subtilis at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
B subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root rot incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
soil application of BCA1 strain of B.subtilis at 2.5 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum root rot incidence and maximum yield was observed from soil application of TNAU strain of B subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha but the effect is on par with soil application of BCA1 strain of B.subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2580–2795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field soil application of TNAU B. subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha gave maximum mung bean yield.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
soil application of TNAU strain of B subtilis at 2.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
B subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
soil application of BCA1 strain of B.subtilis at 2.5 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum root rot incidence and maximum yield was observed from soil application of TNAU strain of B subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha but the effect is on par with soil application of BCA1 strain of B.subtilis at 2.5 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2580–2795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–65 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

application · Bacillus subtilis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.