Paper · 2008 · American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Effect of Plant Density on Flowering Date, Yield and Quality Attribute of Bush Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) under Center Pivot Irrigation System

Samih Abubaker

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This research evaluates six different planting densities (10∗30, 20∗30, 30∗30, 40∗30, 50∗30, 60∗30) of bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.), Bronco variety and their impacts on yield, earliness and quality attributes using Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) under central pivot irrigation system in the southern part of Jordan during 2007 growing season. Although, the highest planting density (10∗30 cm) gave the highest percent of early yield (93%) in comparison to the total yield it was among the lowest yielding ability and tended to give pods with lower N,P,K and protein contents. The highest yields were obtained by 20∗30 and 30∗30 cm planting densities with 73 and 71% respectively of early yield related to the total yield. Stem diameter, pod dry weight as well as protein and mineral contents tended to be higher under the lower planting densities. The issue of this research seems to give clear perspectives to obtain high early yield with good enough quality under 20∗30 cm bush bean under central pivot irrigation system in the desert of southern part of Jordan.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest planting density produced 93% early yield relative to total yield.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
10∗30 cme0
Outcome
percent of early yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
93%e0
Comparator
total yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“Although, the highest planting density (10∗30 cm) gave the highest percent of early yield (93%) in comparison to the total yield it was among the lowest yielding ability and tended to give pods with lower N,P,K and protein contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest planting density had among the lowest total yield.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
10∗30 cme0
Outcome
yielding abilitye0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
total yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“Although, the highest planting density (10∗30 cm) gave the highest percent of early yield (93%) in comparison to the total yield it was among the lowest yielding ability and tended to give pods with lower N,P,K and protein contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pods at the highest density tended to have lower N, P, K and protein contents.

Taxon
beant0
Organ / stage
podse0
Treatment
10∗30 cme0
Outcome
N,P,K and protein contentse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
total yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“Although, the highest planting density (10∗30 cm) gave the highest percent of early yield (93%) in comparison to the total yield it was among the lowest yielding ability and tended to give pods with lower N,P,K and protein contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20∗30 cm density gave the highest yields and 73 early yield.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
20∗30e0
Outcome
early yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
73e0
Comparator
total yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields were obtained by 20∗30 and 30∗30 cm planting densities with 73 and 71% respectively of early yield related to the total yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

30∗30 cm density gave the highest yields and 71% early yield.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
30∗30e0
Outcome
early yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
71%e0
Comparator
total yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields were obtained by 20∗30 and 30∗30 cm planting densities with 73 and 71% respectively of early yield related to the total yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem diameter and pod dry weight tended to be higher at lower planting densities.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
lower planting densitiese0
Outcome
Stem diameter, pod dry weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Stem diameter, pod dry weight as well as protein and mineral contents tended to be higher under the lower planting densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein and mineral contents tended to be higher at lower planting densities.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
lower planting densitiese0
Outcome
protein and mineral contentse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Stem diameter, pod dry weight as well as protein and mineral contents tended to be higher under the lower planting densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favor 20∗30 cm spacing for high early yield with adequate quality under center pivot irrigation.

Taxon
bush beane0
Treatment
20∗30 cme0
Outcome
high early yield with good enough qualitye0
Setting
desert of southern part of Jordane0

Verbatim

e0

“The issue of this research seems to give clear perspectives to obtain high early yield with good enough quality under 20∗30 cm bush bean under central pivot irrigation system in the desert of southern part of Jordan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1073 · show in text ↑

density · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

density · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.