Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Tomato Fruit Quality under Protected Environment and Open Field Conditions

Neerja Rana; Manish Kumar; Abhishek Walia; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Vegetables are important component of balanced human diet. Advanced production technologies are being followed to measure productivity and quality of produce. Pro­tected cultivation is an improved agro technique being used worldwide to register 3-4 times increase in production. Tomato is grown extensively in the plastic greenhouses for higher productivity. The growing conditions especially light and temperature are known to influence both composition and quality of tomato fruits. Hence, studies have been conducted to estimate the quality parameters of tomato grown both under open and in polyhouse with shade nets during cloudy weather in rainy season The results reveals that the fruits harvested from the field had higher TSS:TA ratio (11.73), acid­ity (0.49%), total sugar (2.5%), ascorbic acid (14.7 mg 100g-1), TSS (5.76oB) and the lycopene content (8.7mg 100 g-1) than the fruits grown under protected conditions. However, the environment in the polyhouse favour the growth and development of tomato plant through increased plant height (1.4m) and number of branches. The fruit yield obtained from the polyhouse was higher (2.6 kg plant-1) than the open field (1.5 kg plant-1). Hence, both types of environmental conditions are favourable in some aspects. The parameters of economic importance like fruit weight and yield are better under protected conditions but the nutritional parameters like vitamin C and lycopene content are higher in open conditions during rainy season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field tomato fruit had a higher TSS:TA ratio than protected fruit, at 11.73.

Outcome
TSS:TA ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.73e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits harvested from the field had higher TSS:TA ratio (11.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field tomato fruit had higher acidity than protected fruit, at 0.49%.

Outcome
acid­itye0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.49%e0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits harvested from the field had higher TSS:TA ratio (11.73), acid­ity (0.49%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field tomato fruit had higher total sugar than protected fruit, at 2.5%.

Outcome
total sugare0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.5%e0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits harvested from the field had higher TSS:TA ratio (11.73), acid­ity (0.49%), total sugar (2.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field tomato fruit had higher ascorbic acid than protected fruit, at 14.7 mg 100g-1.

Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.7 mg 100g-1e0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits harvested from the field had higher TSS:TA ratio (11.73), acid­ity (0.49%), total sugar (2.5%), ascorbic acid (14.7 mg 100g-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field tomato fruit had higher TSS than protected fruit, at 5.76oB.

Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.76oBe0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits harvested from the field had higher TSS:TA ratio (11.73), acid­ity (0.49%), total sugar (2.5%), ascorbic acid (14.7 mg 100g-1), TSS (5.76oB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field tomato fruit had higher lycopene content than protected fruit, at 8.7mg 100 g-1.

Outcome
lycopene contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.7mg 100 g-1e0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits harvested from the field had higher TSS:TA ratio (11.73), acid­ity (0.49%), total sugar (2.5%), ascorbic acid (14.7 mg 100g-1), TSS (5.76oB) and the lycopene content (8.7mg 100 g-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyhouse conditions increased tomato plant height to 1.4m and increased branch number.

Treatment
environment in the polyhousee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.4me0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“environment in the polyhouse favour the growth and development of tomato plant through increased plant height (1.4m) and number of branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyhouse tomato fruit yield was higher at 2.6 kg plant-1 than open-field yield at 1.5 kg plant-1.

Treatment
polyhousee0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.6 kg plant-1e0
Qualifier
1.5 kg plant-1e0
Comparator
open fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield obtained from the polyhouse was higher (2.6 kg plant-1) than the open field (1.5 kg plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit weight was better under protected conditions.

Treatment
protected conditionse0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit weight and yield are better under protected conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑

protected cultivation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

climate site · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

protected cultivation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.