Paper · 1997 · Plant Cell & Environment

Expression of XET‐related genes and its relation to elongation in leaves of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

P. H. D. SCHÜNMANN; R. C. SMITH; V. LÅNG; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
64
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Five cDNA clones were isolated from barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) that encoded mRNAs related to xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET). One of the clones encoded a protein with XET activity in vitro. Sequence comparisons revealed five families of XET‐related sequences, one of which (containing two of the barley genes) was novel. Hybridization studies using clone‐specific probes indicated that the corresponding genes were represented once, or possibly twice, in the barley genome. Treatment of dwarf mutants with gibberellic acid (GA 3 ), or homozygosity at the ‘slender’ ( sln1 ) locus, resulted in a 2.5‐fold (approximately) stimulation of blade elongation rate. Three of the five clones detected mRNAs that were maximally expressed towards the base of the blade, and present in greater quantities in GA 3 ‐treated or slender seedlings. The remaining two clones detected mRNAs that were maximally expressed in the middle of the blade. Relative elemental growth rate (REGR) profiles of leaves growing with or without GA 3 treatment revealed similar maximal REGR values despite a 2.5‐fold difference in leaf elongation rate. Segments of GA 3 ‐treated leaves attained their maximal REGR values more rapidly, this being associated with enhanced expression of the three ‘basal’ XET‐related mRNAs. Highest XET activities were detected in the base of the elongation zone, and in GA 3 ‐treated seedlings a second activity peak was observed near the distal end of the elongation zone. We conclude that there are likely to be several XET isoenzymes with different expression patterns, and identify those XET‐related proteins potentially involved in leaf elongation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five cDNA clones encoded XET-related mRNAs.

Gene
xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET)e0
Outcome
Five cDNA clonese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Five cDNA clones were isolated from barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) that encoded mRNAs related to xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–141 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One clone encoded a protein with XET activity in vitro.

Gene
XETe0
Outcome
XET activity in vitroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One of the clones encoded a protein with XET activity in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–205 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five XET-related sequence families were identified, including a novel family.

Gene
XET‐related sequencese0
Outcome
five families of XET‐related sequencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequence comparisons revealed five families of XET‐related sequences, one of which (containing two of the barley genes) was novel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 treatment or slender homozygosity stimulated blade elongation approximately 2.5-fold.

Treatment
gibberellic acid (GA 3 )e0
Outcome
blade elongation ratee0
Direction
stimulatione0
Value
2.5‐folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of dwarf mutants with gibberellic acid (GA 3 ), or homozygosity at the ‘slender’ ( sln1 ) locus, resulted in a 2.5‐fold (approximately) stimulation of blade elongation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three clone mRNAs were most expressed at the blade base and more abundant after GA3 treatment.

Organ / stage
base of the bladee0
Outcome
mRNAse0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three of the five clones detected mRNAs that were maximally expressed towards the base of the blade, and present in greater quantities in GA 3 ‐treated or slender seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other two clone mRNAs were most expressed in the middle of the blade.

Organ / stage
middle of the bladee0
Outcome
mRNAse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The remaining two clones detected mRNAs that were maximally expressed in the middle of the blade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3-treated leaves reached maximal relative elemental growth rate more rapidly.

Treatment
GA 3 ‐treatede0
Outcome
maximal REGR valuese0
Direction
more rapidlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Segments of GA 3 ‐treated leaves attained their maximal REGR values more rapidly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

XET activity was highest at the base of the elongation zone.

Organ / stage
base of the elongation zonee0
Gene
XETe0
Outcome
XET activitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest XET activities were detected in the base of the elongation zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑

gibberellin A3 · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.