Paper · 2011 · Journal of Crop Improvement

Temporal Changes in Fertility and Physical Properties of Soil under Contrasting Tillage-Crop Residue Management for Sustainable Rice-Wheat System on Sandy-Loam Soil

Reshmi Sarkar; Sandipta Kar

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Carbon loss (CO2 emission) through residue burning, which causes global warming, and intensive tillage, which reduces soil organic carbon (SOC) pool, is a major concern in rice-wheat systems (RWS). Assessments of the temporal variations in SOC and soil physical properties under different tillage and crop-residue treatments were performed through a three-year field experiment to understand the effect of these management practices on the environmental sustainability of the RWS. The wheat rotated with transplanted rice (TR) was found to be more effective in sustaining SOC than direct-seeded rice (DR). Intensive tillage practices of TR and DR increased bulk density and decreased saturated hydraulic conductivity, whereas crop residue incorporation helped decrease the negative impact of intensive tillage by increasing infiltration rate and decreasing soil strength. Incorporation of both rice and wheat residue to lateritic sandy loam helped improve soil quality and sustain yield of RWS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat rotated with transplanted rice sustained soil organic carbon more effectively than direct-seeded rice.

Treatment
transplanted rice (TR)e0
Outcome
SOCe0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
direct-seeded rice (DR)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat rotated with transplanted rice (TR) was found to be more effective in sustaining SOC than direct-seeded rice (DR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive tillage in transplanted and direct-seeded rice increased bulk density.

Taxon
TR and DRe0
Treatment
Intensive tillage practicese0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Intensive tillage practices of TR and DR increased bulk density and decreased saturated hydraulic conductivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive tillage in transplanted and direct-seeded rice decreased saturated hydraulic conductivity.

Taxon
TR and DRe0
Treatment
Intensive tillage practicese0
Outcome
saturated hydraulic conductivitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Intensive tillage practices of TR and DR increased bulk density and decreased saturated hydraulic conductivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop residue incorporation increased infiltration rate under intensive tillage.

Treatment
crop residue incorporatione0
Outcome
infiltration ratee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“crop residue incorporation helped decrease the negative impact of intensive tillage by increasing infiltration rate and decreasing soil strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop residue incorporation decreased soil strength under intensive tillage.

Treatment
crop residue incorporatione0
Outcome
soil strengthe0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“crop residue incorporation helped decrease the negative impact of intensive tillage by increasing infiltration rate and decreasing soil strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporating rice and wheat residue improved soil quality in lateritic sandy loam.

Treatment
Incorporation of both rice and wheat residuee0
Outcome
soil qualitye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of both rice and wheat residue to lateritic sandy loam helped improve soil quality and sustain yield of RWS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporating rice and wheat residue sustained rice–wheat system yield.

Treatment
Incorporation of both rice and wheat residuee0
Outcome
yield of RWSe0
Direction
sustaine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of both rice and wheat residue to lateritic sandy loam helped improve soil quality and sustain yield of RWS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–993 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 110 positive, 14 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

Oryza sativa · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

transplanting · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.