Paper · 1998 · International Journal of Plant Sciences

Effect of Environment on the Magnitude of Inbreeding Depression in Seed Germination in a Partially Self-Fertile Perennial Herb (Blandfordia grandiflora, Liliaceae)

Mike Ramsey; Glenda Vaughton

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
53
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Inbreeding depression, the decreased fitness of progeny derived from self-fertilization compared to outcrossing, is affected by the environmental conditions in which it is examined, often being greater in adverse environments than in benign environments. We germinated selfed and outcrossed seeds from the same Blandfordia grandiflora plants and estimated inbreeding depression in germination under benign laboratory conditions and adverse field conditions. In both environments, more outcrossed seeds germinated than did selfed seeds. In the laboratory, only 7.7% more outcrossed seeds germinated than did selfed seeds (98.4% ± 0.6 vs. 90.7% ± 3.9), whereas in the field the difference was 22.1% (92.5% ± 1.9 vs. 70.4% ± 5.0). The decrease in germination between the laboratory and field was only 5.9% for outcrossed seeds, but was 20.8% for selfed seeds. Germination of selfed seeds was more variable than of outcrossed seeds in both environments (coefficients of variation, selfed seeds vs. outcrossed seeds: laboratory, 13.6% vs. 1.9%; field, 22.5% vs. 6.5%). Germination success varied significantly among maternal plants, except for outcrossed seeds in the laboratory. In the laboratory, 60% of plants expressed inbreeding depression, whereas in the field all plants expressed inbreeding depression. The magnitude of inbreeding depression was significantly greater in the field than in the laboratory (0.242 ± 0.156 vs. 0.078 ± 0.130). Inbreeding depression of individual plants was positively related between the two environments (r = 0.69). The greater inbreeding depression in the field indicated that selfed seeds were unable to cope with the physiological demands that were imposed by the more adverse field environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Outcrossed seeds germinated more than selfed seeds in both environments.

Taxon
Blandfordia grandifloraBlandfordia grandiflorat0
Outcome
outcrossed seeds germinatede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
selfed seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Blandfordia grandiflora
Blandfordia grandiflora · TaxonDoug Beckers from Killcare Heights, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both environments, more outcrossed seeds germinated than did selfed seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blandfordia grandiflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laboratory germination was 7.7% higher for outcrossed than selfed seeds.

Taxon
Blandfordia grandifloraBlandfordia grandiflorat0
Outcome
outcrossed seeds germinatede0
Direction
moree0
Value
7.7%e0
Qualifier
98.4% ± 0.6 vs. 90.7% ± 3.9e0
Comparator
selfed seedse0
Setting
laboratorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Blandfordia grandiflora
Blandfordia grandiflora · TaxonDoug Beckers from Killcare Heights, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the laboratory, only 7.7% more outcrossed seeds germinated than did selfed seeds (98.4% ± 0.6 vs. 90.7% ± 3.9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blandfordia grandiflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field germination was 22.1% higher for outcrossed than selfed seeds.

Taxon
Blandfordia grandifloraBlandfordia grandiflorat0
Outcome
differencee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
22.1%e0
Qualifier
92.5% ± 1.9 vs. 70.4% ± 5.0e0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Blandfordia grandiflora
Blandfordia grandiflora · TaxonDoug Beckers from Killcare Heights, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the field the difference was 22.1% (92.5% ± 1.9 vs. 70.4% ± 5.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blandfordia grandiflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Outcrossed seed germination decreased by 5.9% from laboratory to field.

Taxon
Blandfordia grandifloraBlandfordia grandiflorat0
Material
outcrossed seedse0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
5.9%e0
Setting
laboratory and fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Blandfordia grandiflora
Blandfordia grandiflora · TaxonDoug Beckers from Killcare Heights, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in germination between the laboratory and field was only 5.9% for outcrossed seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blandfordia grandiflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selfed seed germination decreased by 20.8% from laboratory to field.

Taxon
Blandfordia grandifloraBlandfordia grandiflorat0
Outcome
selfed seedse0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
20.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Blandfordia grandiflora
Blandfordia grandiflora · TaxonDoug Beckers from Killcare Heights, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but was 20.8% for selfed seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blandfordia grandiflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selfed seed germination was more variable than outcrossed seed germination in both environments.

Taxon
Blandfordia grandifloraBlandfordia grandiflorat0
Outcome
Germination of selfed seedse0
Direction
more variablee0
Comparator
outcrossed seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Blandfordia grandiflora
Blandfordia grandiflora · TaxonDoug Beckers from Killcare Heights, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of selfed seeds was more variable than of outcrossed seeds in both environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blandfordia grandiflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination success varied significantly among maternal plants except for outcrossed laboratory seeds.

Taxon
Blandfordia grandifloraBlandfordia grandiflorat0
Outcome
Germination successe0
Direction
variede0
Qualifier
except for outcrossed seeds in the laboratorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Blandfordia grandiflora
Blandfordia grandiflora · TaxonDoug Beckers from Killcare Heights, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination success varied significantly among maternal plants, except for outcrossed seeds in the laboratory.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blandfordia grandiflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the laboratory, 60% of plants expressed inbreeding depression.

Taxon
Blandfordia grandifloraBlandfordia grandiflorat0
Outcome
plants expressed inbreeding depressione0
Value
60%e0
Setting
laboratorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Blandfordia grandiflora
Blandfordia grandiflora · TaxonDoug Beckers from Killcare Heights, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the laboratory, 60% of plants expressed inbreeding depression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blandfordia grandiflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field, all plants expressed inbreeding depression.

Taxon
Blandfordia grandifloraBlandfordia grandiflorat0
Outcome
all plants expressed inbreeding depressione0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Blandfordia grandiflora
Blandfordia grandiflora · TaxonDoug Beckers from Killcare Heights, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the field all plants expressed inbreeding depression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blandfordia grandiflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inbreeding depression was significantly greater in the field than laboratory.

Taxon
Blandfordia grandifloraBlandfordia grandiflorat0
Outcome
magnitude of inbreeding depressione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
0.242 ± 0.156 vs. 0.078 ± 0.130e0
Comparator
laboratorye0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Blandfordia grandiflora
Blandfordia grandiflora · TaxonDoug Beckers from Killcare Heights, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The magnitude of inbreeding depression was significantly greater in the field than in the laboratory (0.242 ± 0.156 vs. 0.078 ± 0.130)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blandfordia grandiflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual plant inbreeding depression was positively related between environments.

Taxon
Blandfordia grandifloraBlandfordia grandiflorat0
Outcome
Inbreeding depression of individual plantse0
Direction
positively relatede0
Value
r = 0.69e0
Setting
two environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Blandfordia grandiflora
Blandfordia grandiflora · TaxonDoug Beckers from Killcare Heights, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inbreeding depression of individual plants was positively related between the two environments (r = 0.69)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Blandfordia grandiflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–151 · show in text ↑