Abstract
Seeds of 250 plants from M 1 generation of three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black) at 40, 50 and 60 Kr separately and with gibberellic acid (GA 3 ) along with control were grown to raise the M 2 generation. The effects on 100-seed weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index, days to flowering and maturity in M 2 generation were highly significant (p<0.01) within genotypes, treatments and also for their interaction. Statistically significant increase in 100-seed weight was observed with the combine treatment at 40 Kr while it was decreased at 60 Kr as compared with gamma irradiation. Grain yield was significantly increased with gamma irradiation however, stimulation was recorded with the application of GA 3 . Biological yield was decreased while, harvest index was increased with both types of treatments. However, more harvest index was recorded with combine treatment. Days to flowering were increased at 40 and 60 Kr with gamma irradiation while, decreased at 40 and 50 Kr with the combine treatment. Days to maturity were decreased with both the treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Effects of genotype, treatment and their interaction on 100-seed weight, grain yield and biological yield in the M2 generation were highly significant
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Material
- Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black)e0
- Outcome
- 100-seed weight, grain yield, biological yielde1
- Qualifier
- within genotypes, treatments and also for their interactione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black) at 40, 50 and 60 Kr separately and with gibberellic acid (GA 3 ) along with control”
e1“The effects on 100-seed weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index, days to flowering and maturity in M2 generation were highly significant (p<0.01) within genotypes, treatments and also for their interaction”
Claim · model-written summary
Effects of genotype, treatment and their interaction on harvest index, days to flowering and days to maturity in the M2 generation were highly significant
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black)e0
- Outcome
- harvest index, days to flowering and maturitye1
- Qualifier
- within genotypes, treatments and also for their interactione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black) at 40, 50 and 60 Kr separately and with gibberellic acid (GA 3 ) along with control”
e1“The effects on 100-seed weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index, days to flowering and maturity in M2 generation were highly significant (p<0.01) within genotypes, treatments and also for their interaction”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined gibberellic acid and gamma irradiation at 40 Kr significantly increased 100-seed weight compared with gamma irradiation
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- combine treatment at 40 Kre2
- Outcome
- 100-seed weighte2
- Direction
- increasee2
- Comparator
- gamma irradiatione2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black)”
e2“Statistically significant increase in 100-seed weight was observed with the combine treatment at 40 Kr while it was decreased at 60 Kr as compared with gamma irradiation”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment at 60 Kr decreased 100-seed weight compared with gamma irradiation
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- combine treatmente2
- Outcome
- 100-seed weighte2
- Direction
- decreasede2
- Qualifier
- at 60 Kre2
- Comparator
- gamma irradiatione2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black)”
e2“Statistically significant increase in 100-seed weight was observed with the combine treatment at 40 Kr while it was decreased at 60 Kr as compared with gamma irradiation”
Claim · model-written summary
Gamma irradiation significantly increased grain yield compared with control
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- gamma irradiatione3
- Outcome
- Grain yielde3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black)”
e3“Grain yield was significantly increased with gamma irradiation however, stimulation was recorded with the application of GA 3”
e4“along with control were grown to raise the M 2 generation”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of GA3 stimulated grain yield compared with control
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- GA 3e3
- Outcome
- Grain yielde3
- Direction
- increaseinferrede3
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black)”
e3“Grain yield was significantly increased with gamma irradiation however, stimulation was recorded with the application of GA 3”
e4“along with control were grown to raise the M 2 generation”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield decreased with both treatments compared with control
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- both types of treatmentse4
- Outcome
- Biological yielde4
- Direction
- decreasede4
- Comparator
- controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black)”
e4“Biological yield was decreased while, harvest index was increased with both types of treatments”
e5“along with control were grown to raise the M 2 generation”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvest index increased with both treatments compared with control
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- both types of treatmentse4
- Outcome
- harvest indexe4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Comparator
- controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black)”
e4“Biological yield was decreased while, harvest index was increased with both types of treatments”
e5“along with control were grown to raise the M 2 generation”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment gave more harvest index than the other treatments
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- combine treatmente6
- Outcome
- harvest indexe6
- Direction
- moree6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black)”
e6“However, more harvest index was recorded with combine treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Gamma irradiation at 40 and 60 Kr increased days to flowering
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- gamma irradiatione7
- Outcome
- Days to floweringe7
- Direction
- increasede7
- Qualifier
- at 40 and 60 Kre7
- Comparator
- controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black)”
e5“along with control were grown to raise the M 2 generation”
e7“Days to flowering were increased at 40 and 60 Kr with gamma irradiation while, decreased at 40 and 50 Kr with the combine treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment at 40 and 50 Kr decreased days to flowering
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- combine treatmente7
- Outcome
- Days to floweringe7
- Direction
- decreasede7
- Qualifier
- at 40 and 50 Kre7
- Comparator
- controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black)”
e5“along with control were grown to raise the M 2 generation”
e7“Days to flowering were increased at 40 and 60 Kr with gamma irradiation while, decreased at 40 and 50 Kr with the combine treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Days to maturity decreased with both treatments compared with control
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- both the treatmentse6
- Outcome
- Days to maturitye6
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Comparator
- controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three chickpea genotypes viz, Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black)”
e5“along with control were grown to raise the M 2 generation”
e6“Days to maturity were decreased with both the treatments”
The same questions in other papers
radiation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.