Paper · 2011 · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)

Induced polygenic variability for quantitative traits in chickpea var. Pusa-372

Aijaz A. Wani

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Induction and evaluation of polygenic variability following treatments with gamma rays, EMS and their combinations were studied in chickpea var. Pusa-372. Mean values for various quantitative traits increased at lower or intermediate treatments and decreased at higher treatments in M2 generation. For days to flowering, days to maturity and plant height, mean values significantly decreased, whereas, for yield and yield contributing traits, mean values increased significantly in M3 generation. A considerable amount of variability was induced in the treated populations in M2 generation. Heritability and genetic advance values were quite high in M2 as compared to control for all polygenic traits which increased further in M3 for all yield contributing traits. Increase in the mean values of various polygenic traits, especially yield contributing traits, coupled with increase in heritability and genetic advance suggest fixation of desirable alleles for these traits and scope for selection of desirable high yielding types in chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower or intermediate gamma-ray and EMS treatments increased mean values of various quantitative traits in M2 chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Pusa-372e0
Treatment
gamma rays, EMSe0
Outcome
Mean values for various quantitative traitse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
lower or intermediate treatmentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Induction and evaluation of polygenic variability following treatments with gamma rays, EMS and their combinations were studied in chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean values for various quantitative traits increased at lower or intermediate treatments and decreased at higher treatments in M2 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher gamma-ray and EMS treatments decreased mean values of various quantitative traits in M2 chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Pusa-372e0
Treatment
gamma rays, EMSe0
Outcome
Mean values for various quantitative traitse1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
higher treatmentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Induction and evaluation of polygenic variability following treatments with gamma rays, EMS and their combinations were studied in chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean values for various quantitative traits increased at lower or intermediate treatments and decreased at higher treatments in M2 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma-ray and EMS treatments significantly decreased days to flowering, days to maturity and plant height in M3 chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Pusa-372e0
Treatment
gamma rays, EMSe0
Outcome
days to flowering, days to maturity and plant heighte2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
M3 generatione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Induction and evaluation of polygenic variability following treatments with gamma rays, EMS and their combinations were studied in chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–153 · show in text ↑
e2

“For days to flowering, days to maturity and plant height, mean values significantly decreased, whereas, for yield and yield contributing traits, mean values increased significantly in M3 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma-ray and EMS treatments significantly increased yield and yield contributing traits in M3 chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Pusa-372e0
Treatment
gamma rays, EMSe0
Outcome
yield and yield contributing traitse2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
M3 generatione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Induction and evaluation of polygenic variability following treatments with gamma rays, EMS and their combinations were studied in chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–153 · show in text ↑
e2

“For days to flowering, days to maturity and plant height, mean values significantly decreased, whereas, for yield and yield contributing traits, mean values increased significantly in M3 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–495 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma-ray and EMS treatments induced a considerable amount of variability in treated chickpea populations in M2 generation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
gamma rays, EMSe0
Outcome
variabilitye4
Qualifier
treated populations in M2 generatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Induction and evaluation of polygenic variability following treatments with gamma rays, EMS and their combinations were studied in chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–153 · show in text ↑
e4

“A considerable amount of variability was induced in the treated populations in M2 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heritability and genetic advance values were quite high in M2 chickpea compared with control for all polygenic traits.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Pusa-372e0
Treatment
gamma rays, EMSe0
Outcome
Heritability and genetic advance valuese5
Direction
quite highe5
Qualifier
all polygenic traitse5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Induction and evaluation of polygenic variability following treatments with gamma rays, EMS and their combinations were studied in chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–153 · show in text ↑
e5

“Heritability and genetic advance values were quite high in M2 as compared to control for all polygenic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heritability and genetic advance increased further in M3 for yield contributing traits compared with M2.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Pusa-372e0
Treatment
gamma rays, EMSe0
Outcome
Heritability and genetic advance valuese5
Direction
increased furthere6
Qualifier
in M3e6
Comparator
M2e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Induction and evaluation of polygenic variability following treatments with gamma rays, EMS and their combinations were studied in chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–153 · show in text ↑
e5

“Heritability and genetic advance values were quite high in M2 as compared to control for all polygenic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–700 · show in text ↑
e6

“which increased further in M3 for all yield contributing traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–764 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

There is scope for selection of desirable high-yielding chickpea types from the treated populations.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume7
Outcome
scope for selection of desirable high yielding typese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“scope for selection of desirable high yielding types in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1042 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The increases in mean values and in heritability and genetic advance suggest fixation of desirable alleles for these traits.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
fixation of desirable allelese1
Qualifier
increase in heritability and genetic advancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Induction and evaluation of polygenic variability following treatments with gamma rays, EMS and their combinations were studied in chickpea var. Pusa-372”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increase in the mean values of various polygenic traits, especially yield contributing traits, coupled with increase in heritability and genetic advance suggest fixation of desirable alleles for these traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–973 · show in text ↑

ethyl methanesulfonate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

radiation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.