Paper · 2003 · Compost Science & Utilization

Relating Compost Measures of Stability And Maturity to Plant Growth

L. R. Cooperband; A. G. Stone; M. R. Fryda; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
104
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AbstractAssessment of compost maturity is important for successful use of composts in agricultural and horticultural production. We assessed the "maturity" of four different sawdust-based composts. We composted sawdust with either cannery waste (CW), duck manure (DM), dairy (heifer) manure (HM) or potato culls (PC) for approximately one year. Windrows were turned weekly for the first 60 days of composting, covered for four winter months and then turned monthly for six more months. We measured compost microbial respiration (CO2 loss), total C and N, C:N ratio, water soluble NO3-N and NH4-N, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), pH and electrical conductivity at selected dates over 370 days. Compost effects on ryegrass biomass and N uptake were evaluated in a greenhouse study. We related compost variables to ryegrass growth and N uptake using regression analysis. All composts maintained high respiration rates during the first 60 days of composting. Ammonium-N concentrations declined within the first 60 days of composting, while NO3-N concentrations did not increase until 200+ days. After 250+ days, DM and PC composts produced significantly more ryegrass biomass than either CW or HM composts. Total C, microbial respiration and water-extractable NO3-N were good predictors of compost stability/maturity, or compost resistance to change, while dissolved organic carbon, C:N ratio and EC were not. The compost NO3-N/CO2-C ratio was calculated as a parameter reflecting the increase in net N mineralization and the decrease in respiration rate. At ratio values >8 mg NO3-N/mg CO2-C/day, ryegrass growth and N uptake were at their maximum for three of the four composts, suggesting the ratio has potential as a useful index of compost maturity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All composts maintained high respiration during the first 60 days.

Outcome
respiration ratese0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
first 60 days of compostinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“All composts maintained high respiration rates during the first 60 days of composting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–954 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost ammonium-N declined within 60 days.

Outcome
Ammonium-N concentrationse0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
within the first 60 days of compostinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium-N concentrations declined within the first 60 days of composting, while NO3-N concentrations did not increase until 200+ days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1090 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost nitrate-N did not increase until after 200 days.

Outcome
NO3-N concentrationse0
Direction
did not increasee0
Qualifier
until 200+ dayse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium-N concentrations declined within the first 60 days of composting, while NO3-N concentrations did not increase until 200+ days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1090 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After 250 days, DM compost produced significantly more ryegrass biomass than CW or HM composts.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliume0
Treatment
DMe0
Outcome
ryegrass biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
After 250+ dayse0
Comparator
CW or HM compostse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 250+ days, DM and PC composts produced significantly more ryegrass biomass than either CW or HM composts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After 250 days, PC compost produced significantly more ryegrass biomass than CW or HM composts.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliume0
Treatment
PC compostse0
Outcome
ryegrass biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
After 250+ dayse0
Comparator
CW or HM compostse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 250+ days, DM and PC composts produced significantly more ryegrass biomass than either CW or HM composts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1202 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total carbon, microbial respiration and extractable nitrate were good predictors of compost stability or maturity.

Outcome
compost stability/maturitye0
Direction
good predictorse0
Qualifier
Total C, microbial respiration and water-extractable NO3-Ne0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total C, microbial respiration and water-extractable NO3-N were good predictors of compost stability/maturity, or compost resistance to change, while dissolved organic carbon, C:N ratio and EC were not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1405 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DOC, C:N ratio and EC were not good predictors of compost stability or maturity.

Outcome
compost stability/maturitye0
Qualifier
dissolved organic carbon, C:N ratio and ECe0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Total C, microbial respiration and water-extractable NO3-N were good predictors of compost stability/maturity, or compost resistance to change, while dissolved organic carbon, C:N ratio and EC were not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1405 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ryegrass growth and N uptake were maximal above a nitrate-N to respiration-carbon ratio of 8 for three composts.

Taxon
ryegrassLoliume0
Treatment
compostse0
Outcome
growth and N uptakee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
>8 mg NO3-N/mg CO2-C/daye0
Qualifier
three of the four compostse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At ratio values >8 mg NO3-N/mg CO2-C/day, ryegrass growth and N uptake were at their maximum for three of the four composts, suggesting the ratio has potential as a useful index of compost maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1750 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The ratio has potential as a compost maturity index.

Outcome
useful index of compost maturitye0
Qualifier
potentiale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At ratio values >8 mg NO3-N/mg CO2-C/day, ryegrass growth and N uptake were at their maximum for three of the four composts, suggesting the ratio has potential as a useful index of compost maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1750 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · LoliumPositive and negative results

30 papers: 22 positive, 8 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.