Paper · 2010 · Plant Cell Reports

Cryopreservation enhances embryogenic capacity of Gentiana cruciata (L.) suspension culture and maintains (epi)genetic uniformity of regenerants

Anna Mikuła; Karolina Tomiczak; Jan J. Rybczyński

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
76
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The embryogenic cell suspension culture of Gentiana cruciata, cryopreserved by the encapsulation/dehydration method, survived both short- (48 h) and long-term (1.5 years) cryostorage with more than 80% viability. To assess the influence of cryotreatments on the embryogenic potential, a proembryogenic mass was encapsulated and exposed to the following treatments: (1) osmotic dehydration (OD), (2) OD + air desiccation (AD) and (3) OD + AD + cryostorage (LN). The somatic embryogenesis efficiency increased ten times after osmotic dehydration. The AD and LN cryotreatments did not cause any significant alterations in somatic embryo production. We monitored the (epi)genetic stability of 288 regenerants derived from: non-cryotreated, short-term, and long-term cryostored tissue using metAFLP markers and ten primer combinations. Changes in the sequence and DNA methylation levels were studied by subjecting the DNA to digestion with two pairs of isoschisomer restriction enzymes (KpnI/MseI and Acc65I/MseI). Two new AFLP unique DNA fragments at the DNA sequence level, with no differences at the methylation level, were found between regenerants derived from cryopreserved tissue, compared with the non-cryotreated controls. The Acc65I/MseI methylation levels for the three groups of regenerants were not significantly different. Cluster analysis was capable of identifying a number of sub-clusters. Only one of the sub-clusters comprises almost all regenerants derived from non-cryotreated and short-term cryostored tissue. Plantlets derived from long-term cryostored tissue were grouped into separate clusters. The observed AFLP alterations did not appear to be associated with the use of cryopreservation, but were probably related to the process of in vitro culture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cryopreserved embryogenic suspension culture of Gentiana cruciata kept more than 80% viability after short- and long-term cryostorage.

Taxon
Gentiana cruciataGentiana cruciatat0
Organ / stage
embryogenic cell suspension culturee0
Treatment
encapsulation/dehydration methode0
Outcome
viabilitye0
Value
more than 80%e0
Qualifier
short- (48 h) and long-term (1.5 years) cryostoragee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gentiana cruciata
Gentiana cruciata · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“embryogenic capacity of Gentiana cruciata (L.) suspension culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The embryogenic cell suspension culture of Gentiana cruciata, cryopreserved by the encapsulation/dehydration method, survived both short- (48 h) and long-term (1.5 years) cryostorage with more than 80% viability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic dehydration increased somatic embryogenesis efficiency ten times in the proembryogenic mass.

Taxon
Gentiana cruciataGentiana cruciatat0
Organ / stage
proembryogenic masse1
Treatment
osmotic dehydratione2
Outcome
somatic embryogenesis efficiencye2
Direction
increasede2
Value
ten timese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gentiana cruciata
Gentiana cruciata · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“embryogenic capacity of Gentiana cruciata (L.) suspension culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“a proembryogenic mass was encapsulated and exposed to the following treatments: (1) osmotic dehydration (OD), (2) OD + air desiccation (AD) and (3) OD + AD + cryostorage (LN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–459 · show in text ↑
e2

“The somatic embryogenesis efficiency increased ten times after osmotic dehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Air desiccation and cryostorage cryotreatments did not significantly alter somatic embryo production.

Taxon
Gentiana cruciataGentiana cruciatat0
Treatment
AD and LN cryotreatmentse3
Outcome
somatic embryo productione3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gentiana cruciata
Gentiana cruciata · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“embryogenic capacity of Gentiana cruciata (L.) suspension culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91 · show in text ↑
e3

“The AD and LN cryotreatments did not cause any significant alterations in somatic embryo production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–644 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two new AFLP unique DNA fragments were found in regenerants from cryopreserved tissue compared with non-cryotreated controls.

Taxon
Gentiana cruciataGentiana cruciatat0
Material
regenerants derived from cryopreserved tissuee4
Outcome
AFLP unique DNA fragmentse4
Value
Two newe4
Comparator
non-cryotreated controlse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gentiana cruciata
Gentiana cruciata · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“embryogenic capacity of Gentiana cruciata (L.) suspension culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91 · show in text ↑
e4

“Two new AFLP unique DNA fragments at the DNA sequence level, with no differences at the methylation level, were found between regenerants derived from cryopreserved tissue, compared with the non-cryotreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerants from cryopreserved tissue showed no differences at the methylation level.

Taxon
Gentiana cruciataGentiana cruciatat0
Material
regenerants derived from cryopreserved tissuee4
Outcome
differences at the methylation levele4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gentiana cruciata
Gentiana cruciata · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“embryogenic capacity of Gentiana cruciata (L.) suspension culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91 · show in text ↑
e4

“Two new AFLP unique DNA fragments at the DNA sequence level, with no differences at the methylation level, were found between regenerants derived from cryopreserved tissue, compared with the non-cryotreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acc65I/MseI methylation levels did not differ significantly among the three groups of regenerants.

Taxon
Gentiana cruciataGentiana cruciatat0
Material
three groups of regenerantse5
Outcome
Acc65I/MseI methylation levelse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gentiana cruciata
Gentiana cruciata · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“embryogenic capacity of Gentiana cruciata (L.) suspension culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91 · show in text ↑
e5

“The Acc65I/MseI methylation levels for the three groups of regenerants were not significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster analysis identified a number of sub-clusters among the regenerants.

Taxon
Gentiana cruciataGentiana cruciatat0
Outcome
a number of sub-clusterse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gentiana cruciata
Gentiana cruciata · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“embryogenic capacity of Gentiana cruciata (L.) suspension culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91 · show in text ↑
e6

“Cluster analysis was capable of identifying a number of sub-clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1400 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only one sub-cluster comprised almost all regenerants from non-cryotreated and short-term cryostored tissue.

Taxon
Gentiana cruciataGentiana cruciatat0
Material
regenerants derived from non-cryotreated and short-term cryostored tissuee7
Outcome
Only one of the sub-clusters comprises almost all regenerantse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gentiana cruciata
Gentiana cruciata · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“embryogenic capacity of Gentiana cruciata (L.) suspension culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91 · show in text ↑
e7

“Only one of the sub-clusters comprises almost all regenerants derived from non-cryotreated and short-term cryostored tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1525 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantlets from long-term cryostored tissue were grouped into separate clusters.

Taxon
Gentiana cruciataGentiana cruciatat0
Material
Plantlets derived from long-term cryostored tissuee1
Outcome
grouped into separate clusterse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gentiana cruciata
Gentiana cruciata · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“embryogenic capacity of Gentiana cruciata (L.) suspension culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plantlets derived from long-term cryostored tissue were grouped into separate clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1613 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The observed AFLP alterations were probably not associated with cryopreservation but related to in vitro culture.

Taxon
Gentiana cruciataGentiana cruciatat0
Treatment
use of cryopreservatione1
Outcome
AFLP alterationse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Setting
in vitro culturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gentiana cruciata
Gentiana cruciata · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“embryogenic capacity of Gentiana cruciata (L.) suspension culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The observed AFLP alterations did not appear to be associated with the use of cryopreservation, but were probably related to the process of in vitro culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1771 · show in text ↑