Abstract
Abstract Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties were fertilized with five N treatments in 1969 and two N treatments in 1970 near Belgrade, Mont. The varieties were chosen to represent short, medium, and tall height levels, and each was evaluated for agronomic and quality response. Grain yields of normal ‘Centana’ and medium Centana were similar, even though medium Centana was 25% shorter and the straw yield was 17% less. There was no variety‐by‐fertilizer interaction for yield, indicating that the short and medium height types did not respond any better to N fertilizer than the standard height types. Short Centana had significantly less of its protein translocated from plant to grain than tall or medium Centana. Gain protein percentages decreased as the grainstraw ratio increased, suggesting that the amount of top growth is important in extracting nutrients from the soil. Nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased grain protein percentages, and there was a corresponding increase in loaf volume and grain and texture scores. Baking absorption and mixing time decreased slightly with increasing amounts of N. Water use was similar for the five varieties and increased with increasing rates of N.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Normal and medium Centana had similar grain yields.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)
Triticum aestivume1 - Material
- medium Centanae0
- Outcome
- Grain yieldse0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- normal ‘Centana’e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yields of normal ‘Centana’ and medium Centana were similar”
e1“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Medium Centana was 25% shorter than normal Centana.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume2
- Material
- medium Centanae0
- Outcome
- shortere0
- Direction
- shortere0
- Value
- 25%e0
- Comparator
- normal ‘Centana’e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“medium Centana was 25% shorter”
e1“normal ‘Centana’ and medium Centana”
e2“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Medium Centana straw yield was 17% less than normal Centana.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume2
- Material
- medium Centanae1
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 17%e0
- Comparator
- normal ‘Centana’e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the straw yield was 17% less”
e1“normal ‘Centana’ and medium Centana”
e2“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield response to nitrogen fertilizer did not differ by variety.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- no variety‐by‐fertilizer interactione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no variety‐by‐fertilizer interaction for yield”
e1“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Short Centana translocated significantly less protein from plant to grain than tall or medium Centana.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
- Material
- Short Centanae0
- Outcome
- protein translocated from plant to graine0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- tall or medium Centanae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Short Centana had significantly less of its protein translocated from plant to grain than tall or medium Centana”
e1“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain protein percentages decreased as grain-to-straw ratio increased.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
- Organ / stage
- grainstrawe0
- Outcome
- Gain protein percentagese0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- grainstraw ratio increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Gain protein percentages decreased as the grainstraw ratio increased”
e1“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased grain protein percentages.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Nitrogen fertilizere0
- Outcome
- grain protein percentagese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased grain protein percentages”
e1“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
With nitrogen fertilizer, loaf volume increased.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Nitrogen fertilizere0
- Outcome
- loaf volumee0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased grain protein percentages, and there was a corresponding increase in loaf volume”
e1“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
With nitrogen fertilizer, grain and texture scores increased.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Nitrogen fertilizere0
- Outcome
- grain and texture scorese0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased grain protein percentages, and there was a corresponding increase in loaf volume and grain and texture scores”
e1“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Baking absorption declined slightly with increasing nitrogen.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- increasing amounts of Ne0
- Outcome
- Baking absorptione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Baking absorption and mixing time decreased slightly with increasing amounts of N”
e1“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixing time declined slightly with increasing nitrogen.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- increasing amounts of Ne0
- Outcome
- mixing timee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Baking absorption and mixing time decreased slightly with increasing amounts of N”
e1“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Water use was similar across five wheat varieties.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
- Outcome
- Water usee0
- Direction
- similare0
- Value
- five varietiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water use was similar for the five varieties”
e1“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Water use rose with increasing nitrogen rates.
- Taxon
- spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- increasing rates of Ne0
- Outcome
- Water usee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water use was similar for the five varieties and increased with increasing rates of N”
e1“Five spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
562 papers more in this group
See all 566 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.