Paper · 1973 · Annals of Applied Biology

The effect of benomyl on the infection of tomatoes by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici and Botrytis cinerea

By A. G. CHANNON; MOIRA C. THOMSON

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY In glasshouse experiments at Auchincruive, drench applications of benomyl (100 or 142 mg per plant) to the soil surface around the stem bases of pot‐grown tomato plants before inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici reduced the penetration of the fungus up the stems and/or decreased the development of vascular discoloration and associated severity of wilting. Similar drenches applied after establishment of the fungus in the stems either halted or considerably retarded the growth of the pathogen up the vessels. This again was reflected in reduced vascular discoloration and wilt symptoms. In experiments with benomyl over 2 years at a commercial holding in Argyll, the application of soil drenches (at the rates above) shortly after planting out and again 5 weeks later, coupled with a programme of stem and foliar sprays (at 0–05 % a.i.) during the summer, reduced the development of stem lesions caused chiefly by Botrytis cinerea and increased the general survival of plants more than did drench or spray treatments alone. There were indications that ‘ghost spotting’ of the fruit, particularly where spray applications were made, was also slightly reduced, but the magnitude of the effect was not consistent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preinoculation benomyl soil drenches reduced Fusarium penetration up tomato stems.

Treatment
benomyl (100 or 142 mg per plant)e0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie0pathogen
Outcome
penetration of the fungus up the stemse0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
pot‐grown tomato plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drench applications of benomyl (100 or 142 mg per plant) to the soil surface around the stem bases of pot‐grown tomato plants before inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici reduced the penetration of the fungus up the stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–288 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici and Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preinoculation benomyl drenches decreased vascular discoloration and wilting.

Treatment
benomyl (100 or 142 mg per plant)e0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie0pathogen
Outcome
development of vascular discoloration and associated severity of wiltinge0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drench applications of benomyl (100 or 142 mg per plant) to the soil surface around the stem bases of pot‐grown tomato plants before inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici reduced the penetration of the fungus up the stems and/or decreased the development of vascular discoloration and associated severity of wilting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici and Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl drenches after stem infection halted or retarded pathogen growth up the vessels.

Treatment
Similar drenches applied after establishment of the fungus in the stemse0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie1pathogen
Outcome
growth of the pathogen up the vesselse0
Direction
halted or considerably retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar drenches applied after establishment of the fungus in the stems either halted or considerably retarded the growth of the pathogen up the vessels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–537 · show in text ↑
e1

“before inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–237 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici and Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postinfection benomyl drenches reduced vascular discoloration and wilt symptoms.

Treatment
Similar drenches applied after establishment of the fungus in the stemse0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie1pathogen
Outcome
vascular discoloration and wilt symptomse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar drenches applied after establishment of the fungus in the stems either halted or considerably retarded the growth of the pathogen up the vessels. This again was reflected in reduced vascular discoloration and wilt symptoms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–615 · show in text ↑
e1

“before inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–237 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici and Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil drenches and stem and foliar sprays reduced Botrytis stem lesions more than either treatment alone.

Treatment
soil drenches (at the rates above) shortly after planting out and again 5 weeks later, coupled with a programme of stem and foliar sprays (at 0–05 % a.i.)e0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
development of stem lesions caused chiefly by Botrytis cinereae0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
drench or spray treatments alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of soil drenches (at the rates above) shortly after planting out and again 5 weeks later, coupled with a programme of stem and foliar sprays (at 0–05 % a.i.) during the summer, reduced the development of stem lesions caused chiefly by Botrytis cinerea and increased the general survival of plants more than did drench or spray treatments alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici and Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased general tomato plant survival more than drench or spray alone.

Treatment
soil drenches (at the rates above) shortly after planting out and again 5 weeks later, coupled with a programme of stem and foliar sprays (at 0–05 % a.i.)e0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
general survival of plantse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
drench or spray treatments alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of soil drenches (at the rates above) shortly after planting out and again 5 weeks later, coupled with a programme of stem and foliar sprays (at 0–05 % a.i.) during the summer, reduced the development of stem lesions caused chiefly by Botrytis cinerea and increased the general survival of plants more than did drench or spray treatments alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici and Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl, particularly sprays, appeared to slightly reduce fruit ghost spotting, inconsistently.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
spray applicationse0
Outcome
‘ghost spotting’ of the fruite0
Direction
slightly reducede0
Qualifier
magnitude of the effect was not consistente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were indications that ‘ghost spotting’ of the fruit, particularly where spray applications were made, was also slightly reduced, but the magnitude of the effect was not consistent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“programme of stem and foliar sprays (at 0–05 % a.i.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici and Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–111 · show in text ↑

benomyl · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.