application · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
31 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 21
Evaluation of systemic fungicides for use in the glasshouse industry · 1971
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- positive
Control of tomato grey mould on unheated crops using non‐ systemic fungicide sprays · 1975
- positive
- positive
- positive
Preventive and post‐infection control of Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants by hexanoic acid · 2008
- positive
Effects of Colonization of a Bacterial Endophyte,Azospirillumsp. B510, on Disease Resistance in Rice · 2009
- positive
Biological control of leaf grey mould of greenhouse tomatoes caused byBotrytis cinerea · 2011
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Systemic Resistance to Gray Mold Induced in Tomato by Benzothiadiazole and Trichoderma harzianum T39 · 2013
- positive
- positive
The Biocontrol Efficacy of Streptomyces pratensis LMM15 on Botrytis cinerea in Tomato · 2017
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Suprathreshold Water Spray Stimulus Enhances Plant Defenses against Biotic Stresses in Tomato · 2024
- positive
- positive
The Biological Product Agricultural Jiaosu Enhances Tomato Resistance to Botrytis cinerea · 2025
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.