Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spraying Bacillus thuringiensis inocula onto detached tomato leaves did not suppress gray mold.

A claim from Potential of bioinsecticidal Bacillus thuringiensis inoculum to suppress gray mold in tomato based on induced systemic resistance · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying Bacillus thuringiensis inocula onto detached tomato leaves did not suppress gray mold.

Treatment
inocula were sprayed onto detached leaves of seedlingse1
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae2pathogen
Outcome
gray mold diseasee1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The potential of the active ingredient of a commercial bioinsecticide, XenTari ® ( Bacillus thuringiensis [ BT ] serovar aizawai strain ABTS‐1857), to suppress gray mold in tomato plants was elucidated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–210
e1

“The gray mold disease was significantly suppressed when rhizospheres were drenched with either inoculum, but not when inocula were sprayed onto detached leaves of seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–675
e2

“propagules of the gray mold fungus, Botrytis cinerea, were inoculated onto the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–501

Title

Potential of bioinsecticidal Bacillus thuringiensis inoculum to suppress gray mold in tomato based on induced systemic resistance

Shigenobu Yoshida; Motoo Koitabashi; Dai Yaginuma; et al. Journal of Phytopathology 2019. doi:10.1111/jph.12864

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-72f48a4e0271a2df46079d57b23b49a35da11e7b14a283dc78a30aa6245e6e58 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

application · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.