Paper · 1997 · Annals of Applied Biology

Attachment microbes antagonistic against Botrytis cinerea—biological control and scanning electron microscope studies in vivo

DARRYL W M COOK; PETER G LONG; SIVA GANESH; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
34
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Bacteria and yeasts, selected by an attachment assay for their ability to adhere to Botrytis cinerea hyphae or conidia, were evaluated for biocontrol potential against B. cinerea on excised tomato stems. Eight of the 12 bacteria and seven of the eight yeast isolates conferred 90% to 100% biocontrol activity when antagonist populations were applied at three to 80 times the pathogen inoculum density. Biocontrol was maintained at similar levels when biocontrol agent (BCA) application was delayed up to 48 h after pathogen challenge. Scanning electron microscopy showed extensive colonisation of B. cinerea mycelium or conidia by many of these isolates and also evidence of pathogen degradation. The biocontrol efficacy and potential for the assay are discussed with respect to cell‐to‐cell adhesion as a vehicle to deliver antagonistic mechanisms to highly specific pathogen sites.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight of 12 bacterial isolates gave 90% to 100% biocontrol activity on tomato stems.

Treatment
bacteriae0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Second interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
biocontrol activitye0
Direction
conferrede0
Value
90% to 100%e0
Qualifier
three to 80 times the pathogen inoculum densitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eight of the 12 bacteria and seven of the eight yeast isolates conferred 90% to 100% biocontrol activity when antagonist populations were applied at three to 80 times the pathogen inoculum density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea on excised tomato stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven of eight yeast isolates gave 90% to 100% biocontrol activity on tomato stems.

Treatment
yeast isolatese0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Second interactor
yeast isolatese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
biocontrol activitye0
Direction
conferrede0
Value
90% to 100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eight of the 12 bacteria and seven of the eight yeast isolates conferred 90% to 100% biocontrol activity when antagonist populations were applied at three to 80 times the pathogen inoculum density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea on excised tomato stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol remained similar when antagonist application was delayed as much as 48 h.

Treatment
BCA) application was delayed up to 48 he0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
Biocontrole0
Direction
maintained at similar levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biocontrol was maintained at similar levels when biocontrol agent (BCA) application was delayed up to 48 h after pathogen challenge.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–542 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea on excised tomato stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–210 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many isolates extensively colonized Botrytis mycelium or conidia.

Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
colonisation of B. cinerea mycelium or conidiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extensive colonisation of B. cinerea mycelium or conidia by many of these isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–661 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea on excised tomato stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–210 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scanning electron microscopy showed evidence of pathogen degradation.

Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
pathogen degradatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evidence of pathogen degradation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–703 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea on excised tomato stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–210 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.