Paper · 2007 · Journal of Phytopathology

Ability of Moderately Halophilic Bacteria to Control Grey Mould Disease on Tomato Fruits

N. Sadfi‐Zouaoui; B. Essghaier; M. R. Hajlaoui; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
66
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Tomato is one of the leading crops in Tunisia in terms of weight consumed (20 kg/per person/year). Preserving the quality of the fruit from field to consumer is essential to successful marketing. Grey mould rot induced by Botrytis cinerea is an important cause of postharvest loss depending on season and handling practices. We describe here the ability of halotolerant to moderately halophilic bacteria isolated from different Tunisian Sebkhas (hypersaline soils) to protect fresh‐market tomato fruits from B. cinerea . The tomatoes tested were at two different stages of ripening, (i) mature‐green and (ii) red. Six strains significantly reduced growth of the pathogens from 67% to 87%. The effectiveness of these antagonists was also confirmed on green tomatoes; in which the fruit rot protection rate ranged from 74% to 100%. The antagonists were characterized by morphological, biochemical and physiological tests as well as 16S rDNA sequencing. The halotolerant effective isolates were identified as belonging to one of the species Bacillus subtilis (M1‐20, J9) or B. licheniformis (J24). One effective moderately halophilic isolate (M2‐26) was identified as Planococcus rifietoensis . These strains are a source of hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinases, proteases, laminarinases, amylases, lipases and cellulases. For comparison, 12 halotolerant or moderately halophilic strains obtained from DSM culture collection were also evaluated for their antifungal activity against B. cinerea on tomato fruits. The most effective strains were Halomonas subglaciescola , Halobacillus litoralis , Marinococcus halophilus , Salinococcus roseus , Halovibrio variabilis and Halobacillus halophilus with a percentage of grey mould rot reduction ranging from 71% to 97%. Inoculation of mature‐green tomatoes by the bacterial antagonist of Halobacillus trueperi resulted in no disease development. Our results indicate that the use of halotolerant to halophilic micro‐organisms should be helpful in reducing grey mould disease of stored tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Six bacterial strains reduced pathogen growth by 67% to 87%.

Treatment
Six strainse0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
growth of the pathogense0
Direction
reducede0
Value
67% to 87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six strains significantly reduced growth of the pathogens from 67% to 87%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh‐market tomato fruits from B. cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial antagonists protected green tomatoes from fruit rot at rates of 74% to 100%.

Organ / stage
green tomatoese0
Treatment
these antagonistse0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
fruit rot protection ratee0
Direction
protectione0
Value
74% to 100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effectiveness of these antagonists was also confirmed on green tomatoes; in which the fruit rot protection rate ranged from 74% to 100%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–838 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh‐market tomato fruits from B. cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–527 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective halotolerant isolates were identified as Bacillus subtilis or B. licheniformis.

Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
identified as belonging to one of the species Bacillus subtilis (M1‐20, J9) or B. licheniformis (J24)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The halotolerant effective isolates were identified as belonging to one of the species Bacillus subtilis (M1‐20, J9) or B. licheniformis (J24).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective isolate M2‐26 was identified as Planococcus rifietoensis.

Interactor
Planococcus rifietoensisPlanococcus rifietoensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
identified as Planococcus rifietoensise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One effective moderately halophilic isolate (M2‐26) was identified as Planococcus rifietoensis .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonist strains produced several hydrolytic enzymes.

Outcome
a source of hydrolytic enzymese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These strains are a source of hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinases, proteases, laminarinases, amylases, lipases and cellulases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most effective collection strains reduced tomato grey mould rot by 71% to 97%.

Treatment
The most effective strainse0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
grey mould rot reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
71% to 97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective strains were Halomonas subglaciescola , Halobacillus litoralis , Marinococcus halophilus , Salinococcus roseus , Halovibrio variabilis and Halobacillus halophilus with a percentage of grey mould rot reduction ranging from 71% to 97%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1771 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. cinerea on tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halobacillus trueperi inoculation prevented disease development in mature-green tomatoes.

Organ / stage
mature‐green tomatoese0
Treatment
Inoculation of mature‐green tomatoes by the bacterial antagonist of Halobacillus trueperie0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Second interactor
Halobacillus trueperiHalobacillus trueperie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
no disease developmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of mature‐green tomatoes by the bacterial antagonist of Halobacillus trueperi resulted in no disease development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1897 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh‐market tomato fruits from B. cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–527 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend halotolerant to halophilic microorganisms for reducing stored tomato grey mould.

Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
the use of halotolerant to halophilic micro‐organismse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of halotolerant to halophilic micro‐organisms should be helpful in reducing grey mould disease of stored tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1924–2045 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh‐market tomato fruits from B. cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–527 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.