Paper · 1981 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Genetic analysis in the pasture grass Setaria sphacelata . I. Dry matter yield and flowering

JB Hacker; RA Bray

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The progeny of a 7 x 7 diallel cross between plants randomly selected from a segregating tetraploid setaria population (S. sphacelata var. sevicea and var. splendida) was studied at Lawes, south-east Queensland, over a two year period in two spaced plant replicates. Plants were harvested at 6-week intervals (9-10 week in winter), and dry weight and flower head number were recorded. Two additional replicates were allowed to grow uninterrupted, and date of flowering and flower head number were recorded. Damage caused by the fungus Pyricularia gvisea was scored on all four replicates. Genetic analysis indicated a high order of general combining ability variance for yield in the population and strong positive genetic correlation between seasons for yield (rg = 0.72-1.26). Variance estimates derived from analysis of variance and parent offspring regression were comparable. Genetic variance was strongly and consistently additive for days to flower and flower head number. Positive genetic correlations between seasons and years for days to flower (rg = 0.31-1.09) indicated that genetic differences in flowering were not strongly confounded by environmental effects. Dry matter yield was genetically correlated with flower head number and hence earliness to flower (rg = 0.79-1.16). Days to flower was genetically correlated with flower head length (rg = 0.71-0.91). Resistance to the pathogen Pyricularia grisea was shown to be under genetic control. The data suggested that resistance may be controlled by a gene exhibiting tetrasomic inheritance with two alleles necessary for expression of a high order of resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

General combining ability variance for yield was of a high order in the Setaria population.

Taxon
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0
Outcome
general combining ability variance for yielde1
Direction
high ordere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The progeny of a 7 x 7 diallel cross between plants randomly selected from a segregating tetraploid setaria population (S. sphacelata var. sevicea and var. splendida) was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178 · show in text ↑
e1

“Genetic analysis indicated a high order of general combining ability variance for yield in the population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–694 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield showed a strong positive genetic correlation between seasons.

Taxon
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0
Material
segregating tetraploid setaria populatione0
Outcome
genetic correlation between seasons for yielde2
Direction
strong positivee2
Value
rg = 0.72-1.26e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The progeny of a 7 x 7 diallel cross between plants randomly selected from a segregating tetraploid setaria population (S. sphacelata var. sevicea and var. splendida) was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178 · show in text ↑
e2

“strong positive genetic correlation between seasons for yield (rg = 0.72-1.26)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–777 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variance estimates from analysis of variance and from parent-offspring regression were comparable.

Taxon
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0
Outcome
Variance estimatese3
Direction
comparablee3
Comparator
parent offspring regressione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The progeny of a 7 x 7 diallel cross between plants randomly selected from a segregating tetraploid setaria population (S. sphacelata var. sevicea and var. splendida) was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178 · show in text ↑
e3

“Variance estimates derived from analysis of variance and parent offspring regression were comparable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–879 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic variance for days to flower and flower head number was strongly and consistently additive.

Taxon
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0
Outcome
days to flower and flower head numbere4
Qualifier
strongly and consistently additivee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The progeny of a 7 x 7 diallel cross between plants randomly selected from a segregating tetraploid setaria population (S. sphacelata var. sevicea and var. splendida) was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178 · show in text ↑
e4

“Genetic variance was strongly and consistently additive for days to flower and flower head number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–978 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic correlations between seasons and years for days to flower were positive and indicated that genetic differences in flowering were not strongly confounded by environmental effects.

Taxon
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0
Material
segregating tetraploid setaria populatione0
Outcome
genetic correlations between seasons and years for days to flowere5
Direction
Positivee5
Value
rg = 0.31-1.09e5
Qualifier
not strongly confounded by environmental effectse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The progeny of a 7 x 7 diallel cross between plants randomly selected from a segregating tetraploid setaria population (S. sphacelata var. sevicea and var. splendida) was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178 · show in text ↑
e5

“Positive genetic correlations between seasons and years for days to flower (rg = 0.31-1.09) indicated that genetic differences in flowering were not strongly confounded by environmental effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1173 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yield was genetically correlated with flower head number and hence earliness to flower.

Taxon
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0
Material
segregating tetraploid setaria populatione0
Outcome
Dry matter yielde6
Direction
genetically correlatede6
Value
rg = 0.79-1.16e6
Qualifier
flower head number and hence earliness to flowere6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The progeny of a 7 x 7 diallel cross between plants randomly selected from a segregating tetraploid setaria population (S. sphacelata var. sevicea and var. splendida) was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178 · show in text ↑
e6

“Dry matter yield was genetically correlated with flower head number and hence earliness to flower (rg = 0.79-1.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1289 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Days to flower was genetically correlated with flower head length.

Taxon
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0
Material
segregating tetraploid setaria populatione0
Outcome
Days to flowere7
Direction
genetically correlatede7
Value
rg = 0.71-0.91e7
Qualifier
flower head lengthe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The progeny of a 7 x 7 diallel cross between plants randomly selected from a segregating tetraploid setaria population (S. sphacelata var. sevicea and var. splendida) was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178 · show in text ↑
e7

“Days to flower was genetically correlated with flower head length (rg = 0.71-0.91)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1373 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance to Pyricularia grisea was under genetic control in the Setaria progeny.

Taxon
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0
Interactor
Pyricularia griseaPyricularia griseae7pathogen
Outcome
Resistancee7
Qualifier
under genetic controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyricularia grisea
Pyricularia grisea · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The progeny of a 7 x 7 diallel cross between plants randomly selected from a segregating tetraploid setaria population (S. sphacelata var. sevicea and var. splendida) was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178 · show in text ↑
e7

“Resistance to the pathogen Pyricularia grisea was shown to be under genetic control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1458 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance may be controlled by a gene with tetrasomic inheritance requiring two alleles for a high order of resistance.

Taxon
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0
Gene
a gene exhibiting tetrasomic inheritancee7
Outcome
resistancee7
Qualifier
two alleles necessary for expression of a high order of resistancee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The progeny of a 7 x 7 diallel cross between plants randomly selected from a segregating tetraploid setaria population (S. sphacelata var. sevicea and var. splendida) was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178 · show in text ↑
e7

“The data suggested that resistance may be controlled by a gene exhibiting tetrasomic inheritance with two alleles necessary for expression of a high order of resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1628 · show in text ↑