Paper · 2011 · Plant Disease

Characterization of Botrytis cinerea Isolates Present in Thompson Seedless Table Grapes in the Central Valley of Chile

Marcela Esterio; Gastón Muñoz; Cecilia Ramos; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
43
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Botrytis cinerea isolates from flowers and berries of Vitis vinifera 'Thompson seedless' (grapevine) were characterized in terms of two transposable elements (TEs) Boty and Flipper, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), infection levels, and resistance to iprodione. The isolates were collected from grapevines under fungicide programs of variable numbers of iprodione applications, and replicated in three Chilean Central Valley locations. Recovery was repeated from clusters collected at four phenological stages. Highest infection levels were found at bloom. Fungicide programs including one iprodione application or a combination of other fungicides were most effective for reducing gray mold symptoms. A total of 457 isolates collected from fungicide programs including only one iprodione application, and the control program, were tested for the presence of TEs. In all locations and during all phenological stages, transposa isolates (containing both TEs) were most common, followed by Boty. Vacuma isolates (containing neither TE) were identified at very low levels in two locations and only in the control treatment, and isolates with only Flipper were not detected at any time or location. Vacuma and Boty isolates were all sensitive to iprodione, while transposa isolates showed a wide range of resistance. Based on response to iprodione, the presence of TEs, and presence of vegetative-incompatibility alleles (Bc-hch), the isolates studied belong to B. cinerea Group II, a phylogenetic species within B. cinerea. Hierarchical analysis of molecular variance and genetic diversity analyses of the RAPD genotypes showed a genetic differentiation linked to location, but it was not related to geographic distance. Moreover, a genetic differentiation related to the phenological stage of grapes was also detected.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grapevine infection was highest at bloom.

Taxon
Grapest0
Organ / stage
bloome0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
infection levelse0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest infection levels were found at bloom.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Isolates Present in Thompson Seedless Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One iprodione application or mixed fungicides most effectively reduced gray mold symptoms.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
one iprodione application or a combination of other fungicidese0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
gray mold symptomse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide programs including one iprodione application or a combination of other fungicides were most effective for reducing gray mold symptoms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Isolates Present in Thompson Seedless Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transposa isolates were most common at all locations and stages, followed by Boty.

Taxon
Grapest0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
transposa isolates (containing both TEs) were most common, followed by Botye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all locations and during all phenological stages, transposa isolates (containing both TEs) were most common, followed by Boty.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Isolates Present in Thompson Seedless Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuma isolates were rare and occurred only in control treatments at two locations.

Taxon
Grapest0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
Vacuma isolates (containing neither TE) were identified at very low levelse0
Qualifier
two locations and only in the control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vacuma isolates (containing neither TE) were identified at very low levels in two locations and only in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Isolates Present in Thompson Seedless Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flipper-only isolates were never detected.

Taxon
Grapest0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
isolates with only Flipper were not detectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isolates with only Flipper were not detected at any time or location.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Isolates Present in Thompson Seedless Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuma and Boty isolates were sensitive to iprodione.

Taxon
Grapest0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
Vacuma and Boty isolates were all sensitive to iprodionee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vacuma and Boty isolates were all sensitive to iprodione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Isolates Present in Thompson Seedless Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transposa isolates varied widely in iprodione resistance.

Taxon
Grapest0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
wide range of resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transposa isolates showed a wide range of resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Isolates Present in Thompson Seedless Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Studied isolates belong to B. cinerea Group II.

Taxon
Grapest0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
belong to B. cinerea Group IIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the isolates studied belong to B. cinerea Group II, a phylogenetic species within B. cinerea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Isolates Present in Thompson Seedless Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD genotypes differed genetically by location, without tracking geographic distance.

Taxon
Grapest0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
genetic differentiation linked to locatione0
Setting
locatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetic differentiation linked to location, but it was not related to geographic distance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Isolates Present in Thompson Seedless Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD genotypes differed by grape phenological stage.

Taxon
Grapest0
Organ / stage
phenological stage of grapese0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
genetic differentiatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetic differentiation related to the phenological stage of grapes was also detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1738–1824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea Isolates Present in Thompson Seedless Table Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–87 · show in text ↑

iprodione · Botrytis cinerea · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fungicide · Botrytis cinerea · VitisResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.