Paper · 1988 · Nematologica

Effect of Sesame Intercropping Against the Root-Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne Incognita) in Okra1)

A.S. Tanda; A.S. Atwal

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Intercropping with sesame resulted in decreased penetration of okra roots by Meloidogyne incognita second-stage juveniles (J2) and delayed nematode maturation; it favoured development of M. incognita males and increased yields of okra and chickpea in field tests. The largest effect of intercropping sesame with okra was when they were 15-30 cm apart. In pot tests most J2 penetrated okra roots in sandy loam soil and fewest in clay soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame intercropping decreased juvenile nematode penetration of okra roots.

Treatment
Intercropping with sesamee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
penetration of okra roots by Meloidogyne incognita second-stage juveniles (J2)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping with sesame resulted in decreased penetration of okra roots by Meloidogyne incognita second-stage juveniles (J2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame intercropping delayed nematode maturation.

Taxon
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0
Treatment
Intercropping with sesamee0
Outcome
nematode maturatione0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · TaxonPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping with sesame resulted in decreased penetration of okra roots by Meloidogyne incognita second-stage juveniles (J2) and delayed nematode maturation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame intercropping favored development of male nematodes.

Taxon
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0
Treatment
Intercropping with sesamee0
Outcome
development of M. incognita malese0
Direction
favourede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · TaxonPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping with sesame resulted in decreased penetration of okra roots by Meloidogyne incognita second-stage juveniles (J2) and delayed nematode maturation; it favoured development of M. incognita males”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame intercropping increased okra yield in field tests.

Treatment
Intercropping with sesamee0
Outcome
yields of okrae0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
field testse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping with sesame resulted in decreased penetration of okra roots by Meloidogyne incognita second-stage juveniles (J2) and delayed nematode maturation; it favoured development of M. incognita males and increased yields of okra and chickpea in field tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame intercropping increased chickpea yield in field tests.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Intercropping with sesamee0
Outcome
yields of okra and chickpeae0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
field testse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping with sesame resulted in decreased penetration of okra roots by Meloidogyne incognita second-stage juveniles (J2) and delayed nematode maturation; it favoured development of M. incognita males and increased yields of okra and chickpea in field tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest intercropping effect occurred at 15-30 cm spacing between sesame and okra.

Treatment
intercropping sesame with okrae0
Outcome
largest effect of intercroppinge0
Value
15-30 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest effect of intercropping sesame with okra was when they were 15-30 cm apart.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pots, juvenile penetration of okra roots was greatest in sandy loam and lowest in clay soil.

Treatment
sandy loam soile0
Interactor
J2e0pathogen
Outcome
J2 penetrated okra rootse0
Direction
moste0
Comparator
clay soile0
Setting
pot testse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In pot tests most J2 penetrated okra roots in sandy loam soil and fewest in clay soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–438 · show in text ↑

Sesamum indicum · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 25 positive, 21 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 48 positive, 15 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

intercropping · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.