Paper · 2012 · Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research

Impact of Grafting on Watermelon Growth, Fruit Yield and Quality

Fouad Mohamed; Khalid El-Hamed; Mohammed Elwan; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
38
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Impact of Grafting on Watermelon Growth, Fruit Yield and Quality Grafting is an alternative approach to reduce crop damage resulting from soil-borne pathogens and increases plant abiotic stress tolerance, which in turn increases crop production. The purpose of this study was to determine whether grafting could improve plant growth and fruit quality of watermelon through monitoring the changes induced by different rootstock-scion combinations. Watermelon ( Citrullus lanatus ) cv. Aswan F 1 was grafted into five rootstocks (Nun 6001 F 1 , Strongtosa F 1 , Tetsukabuto F 1 , Ferro F 1 and Shintoza F 1 ) hybrids between Cucurbita maxima and Cucurbita moschata. Highest vegetative growth and fruit yield were obtained by ‘Nun 6001 F 1 ’ as a rootstock using the tongue approach method. Grafting reduced significantly sex ratio by reducing the number of male flowers. Grafting increased significantly lycopene content in fruit flesh by 57% over the control treatment, but did not affect soluble solids content (SSC). One third of the control non-grafted plants died and Fusarium oxysporum was isolated as the responsible pathogen. These results indicate that grafting watermelon onto specific rootstock influences growth, productivity, and quality of the fruit as well as disease resistance. Grafting can be suggested as an alternative method to control of Fusarium wilt in watermelon production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting onto the rootstock Nun 6001 F1 by the tongue approach method gave the highest vegetative growth and fruit yield of watermelon.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Nun 6001 F 1e0
Outcome
vegetative growth and fruit yielde0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest vegetative growth and fruit yield were obtained by ‘Nun 6001 F 1 ’ as a rootstock using the tongue approach method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting significantly reduced the sex ratio of watermelon by reducing the number of male flowers.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Graftinge0
Outcome
sex ratioe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting reduced significantly sex ratio by reducing the number of male flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting significantly increased lycopene content in watermelon fruit flesh by 57% over the control treatment.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Organ / stage
fruit fleshe0
Treatment
Graftinge0
Outcome
lycopene contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
57%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting increased significantly lycopene content in fruit flesh by 57% over the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting did not affect the soluble solids content of watermelon fruit compared with the control.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Graftinge0
Outcome
soluble solids contente0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting increased significantly lycopene content in fruit flesh by 57% over the control treatment, but did not affect soluble solids content (SSC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One third of the non-grafted control watermelon plants died.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
plants diede0
Value
One thirde0
Qualifier
control non-grafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One third of the control non-grafted plants died”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium oxysporum was isolated as the pathogen responsible for the death of the non-grafted control watermelon plants.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
isolated as the responsible pathogene0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium oxysporum was isolated as the responsible pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest grafting as an alternative method to control Fusarium wilt in watermelon production.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Outcome
control of Fusarium wilte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting can be suggested as an alternative method to control of Fusarium wilt in watermelon production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1396 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: phytochemicals · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

grafting · quality: sugar starch · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

27 papers: 13 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.